Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

template: remove -rust references #11916

Closed

Conversation

catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor

Link to ticket: https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/7315

Describe changes:

  • template: remove -rust references

Completes commit 4a7567b cc @jasonish

SV_BRANCH=OISF/suricata-verify#2087

Ticket: 7315

Completes commit 4a7567b

Allows keyword template.buffer to work properly when template
protocol is enabled
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 9, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.18%. Comparing base (6ae5ae7) to head (6b4148f).
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #11916      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.60%   79.18%   -3.43%     
==========================================
  Files         912      912              
  Lines      249342   248925     -417     
==========================================
- Hits       205968   197109    -8859     
- Misses      43374    51816    +8442     
Flag Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus 60.71% <100.00%> (+0.07%) ⬆️
livemode 18.87% <100.00%> (+0.15%) ⬆️
pcap 44.09% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
suricata-verify ?
unittests 58.99% <100.00%> (+0.05%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@suricata-qa
Copy link

Information: QA ran without warnings.

Pipeline 23067

@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor Author

Replaced by #11922

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants