Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Output alert applayer v17.2 #9871

Closed

Conversation

catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor

Only implemented for snmp.version and mqtt.password
But should be implemented for more
So that we can have dynamically registered protocols.
Doing it at compile time, with CFLAGS=-DALPROTO_DYNAMIC_NB=1,
allows to keep the rest of the code using ALPROTO_MAX

Ticket: 5053
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 23, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #9871 (580bb9c) into master (41c0526) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 88.11%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           master    #9871    +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage   82.45%   82.45%            
========================================
  Files         973      962    -11     
  Lines      273063   272704   -359     
========================================
- Hits       225155   224862   -293     
+ Misses      47908    47842    -66     
Flag Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus 64.47% <76.23%> (+0.11%) ⬆️
suricata-verify 61.02% <83.66%> (-0.07%) ⬇️
unittests 63.00% <37.62%> (+0.08%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor Author

How can this CI failure be in only one build ?
having "(null)" in json output for app_layer.error.(null).gap and app_layer.flow.(null) (but not for tx)

@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor Author

Retrying CI without latest d993f43

@suricata-qa
Copy link

Information: QA ran without warnings.

Pipeline 16707

@suricata-qa
Copy link

WARNING:

field baseline test %
SURI_TLPW2_autofp_stats_chk
.uptime 184 194 105.43%

Pipeline 16710

@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor Author

Current status : wait for merge of first commits in #10166

@jasonish did you have more questions about this branch for app-layer plugins ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants