Detect negated content absent buffer 2224 v5 #9988
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Ticket: 2224 For example, `http.referer; content:!"example";` will match on a request without any referer. This is true for all payload keywords handling negation : pcre, isdataat and byte_test
As this keyword has 4 mandatory arguments, and some examples had only three...
catenacyber
requested review from
jufajardini and
victorjulien
as code owners
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #9988 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 82.45% 82.44% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 970 970
Lines 271356 271398 +42
==========================================
- Hits 223746 223744 -2
- Misses 47610 47654 +44
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
|
Information: QA ran without warnings. Pipeline 16908 |
|
Replaced by #10002 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Link to redmine ticket:
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/2224
Describe changes:
byte_testexamplesOISF/suricata-verify#1518
#9983 with additional commit to fix doc about
byte_testkeyword cc @jufajardini