Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

r.univar: add note that parallelization is disabled if mask is set #3562

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 5, 2024

Conversation

ecodiv
Copy link
Contributor

@ecodiv ecodiv commented Apr 5, 2024

Given #3561 I think it is good to add the note that parallelization does not work (or is disabled) when the mask is set to the modules that allow parallelization.

Given #3561 I think it is good to add the note that parallelization does not work (or is disabled) when the mask is set to the functions that allow parallelization.
@ecodiv ecodiv added the manual Documentation related issues label Apr 5, 2024
@petrasovaa
Copy link
Contributor

Since you are adding it, could you also remove the note about extended statistics, they work now since #2683. Thanks!

@ecodiv
Copy link
Contributor Author

ecodiv commented Apr 5, 2024

Since you are adding it, could you also remove the note about extended statistics, they work now since #2683. Thanks!

That is great, didn't know that

…ded stats enabled

Parallelization for extended statistics works with #2683.
@petrasovaa petrasovaa enabled auto-merge (squash) April 5, 2024 16:21
@github-actions github-actions bot added raster Related to raster data processing HTML Related code is in HTML module docs labels Apr 5, 2024
@petrasovaa petrasovaa merged commit 927b653 into OSGeo:main Apr 5, 2024
23 checks passed
@neteler neteler added this to the 8.4.0 milestone Apr 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs HTML Related code is in HTML manual Documentation related issues module raster Related to raster data processing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants