You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Per discussion in the metadata interest group - it might be helpful to standardize the field dct_spatial_sm (Spatial Coverage). Current documentation recommends using GeoNames as a thesaurus and formatting as: "Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States."
These are other formats that are in use in the community:
For U.S. / Canada / Australia:
city, state/province
county, state/province
state/province
For non-U.S.:
city, country
region/province, country
country
Factors to consider:
Including "United States" can be too wordy and is often omitted for items within US unless they are truly nation-wide
Several institutions are using custom scripts to automate GeoNames extraction, but there are multiple levels (fcodes) which could be used to build this field and each institution is using different combinations. Example for GeoNames ID 5190404:
PPL = Franklinville
ADM3 = City of Philadelphia
ADM2 = Philadelphia County
ADM1 = Pennsylvania
PCLI = United States
The dct_spatial_sm field can take multiple values in order to reference these different scales as separate geographic entries, e.g.: "dct_spatial_sm": [ "Franklinville, PA", "City of Philadelphia, PA", "Philadelphia County, PA" ]
Using URIs instead of string text would provide consistency, disambiguate duplicated place names, and might allow referencing multiple sources (e.g. LC and GeoNames); the URIs could be used in faceting but a different label shown in the UI
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We should also consider the different ways that users will interact with this information:
search: text of a user query is used to find matching records
filter: users can view (and sort) a list of values and may select one or more values
item display: user will see the placename when viewing details for a single item, and (depending on the GBL configuration) may click a linkified value to search for matching records
Per discussion in the metadata interest group - it might be helpful to standardize the field
dct_spatial_sm
(Spatial Coverage). Current documentation recommends using GeoNames as a thesaurus and formatting as: "Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States."These are other formats that are in use in the community:
For U.S. / Canada / Australia:
For non-U.S.:
Factors to consider:
fcodes
) which could be used to build this field and each institution is using different combinations. Example for GeoNames ID 5190404:dct_spatial_sm
field can take multiple values in order to reference these different scales as separate geographic entries, e.g.:"dct_spatial_sm": [ "Franklinville, PA", "City of Philadelphia, PA", "Philadelphia County, PA" ]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: