Skip to content

Issues: OpenGeoMetadata/metadata-issues

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

12 Open 44 Closed
12 Open 44 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

New proposal: add a plain text field analogous to isPartOf in GBL 1.0 enhancement New feature or request
#63 opened Aug 7, 2024 by karenmajewicz
2
Clean up visual presentation of Aardvark field list
#62 opened Aug 6, 2024 by rmseifried
Add notes to table of reference URIs
#61 opened Aug 6, 2024 by kgjenkins
Evaluate the Format field in the context of multiple downloads icebox
#57 opened Aug 30, 2023 by karenmajewicz
Update documentation for Replaces and isReplacedBy
#54 opened Jun 7, 2023 by karenmajewicz
2
Schema for machine-readable institutional metadata icebox
#51 opened Apr 12, 2023 by thatbudakguy
3
Create a new page to explain schema groups documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
#48 opened Feb 27, 2023 by rmseifried
@karenmajewicz
3
Create a validation file to check if record meets GBL community standards enhancement New feature or request
#47 opened Feb 27, 2023 by rmseifried
3
Come up with strategy for upgrading Is Part Of field values enhancement New feature or request
#43 opened Aug 4, 2022 by karenmajewicz
5
Add illustrations to Spatial Fields page documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
#39 opened Feb 23, 2022 by kgjenkins
@kgjenkins
7
Do a review of the Obligations for each field
#24 opened Feb 14, 2022 by karenmajewicz
@karenmajewicz
5
Standardize recommended format for 'spatial coverage' documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
#22 opened Jun 3, 2021 by rmseifried
3
ProTip! Find all open issues with in progress development work with linked:pr.