front: fix the issue where the 'More details' button stopped working

[achrafmohye]

Closes #9181

[codecov-commenter]

⚠️ Please install the to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 36.91%. Comparing base (207ba1e) to head (fbafd33).
Report is 3 commits behind head on dev.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...s/trainschedule/components/Timetable/Timetable.tsx	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                dev    #9227      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     36.91%   36.91%   -0.01%     
  Complexity     2242     2242              
============================================
  Files          1255     1255              
  Lines        116958   116959       +1     
  Branches       3270     3270              
============================================
- Hits          43178    43171       -7     
- Misses        71835    71843       +8     
  Partials       1945     1945              

Flag	Coverage Δ
core	74.78% <ø> (ø)
editoast	72.24% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
front	15.61% <0.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
gateway	2.22% <ø> (ø)
osrdyne	2.46% <ø> (ø)
railjson_generator	87.49% <ø> (ø)
tests	86.71% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[woshilapin]

If this was a regression, maybe we need a test to avoid another regression later?

[theocrsb]

LGTM and tested

[SarahBellaha]

LGTM

[clarani]

LGTM ✅

[clarani]

@woshilapin I think the better way to test this is by an e2e test. The e2e test are planned and developed by @Maymanaf right now, so I think we won't add the test in this PR. But we can do it later, with @Maymanaf :)

[Maymanaf]

@woshilapin I think the better way to test this is by an e2e test. The e2e test are planned and developed by @Maymanaf right now, so I think we won't add the test in this PR. But we can do it later, with @Maymanaf :)

The timetable management tests are planned but not prioritized for now : You can check the order #7706