Updated chat schema #2466
Updated chat schema #2466
Conversation
…into chat-feature
…o reply-functionality
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
tests/resolvers/Mutation/createChat.spec.ts (3)
52-57: LGTM: Test case updated correctly with a minor suggestion.The test case has been properly updated to use the new
MutationCreateChatArgstype andcreateChatresolver. The addition of theisGroupproperty is correct.Consider setting
isGroup: falsein this test case since it's testing the scenario where no organization exists, and typically, direct chats are not group chats.const args: MutationCreateChatArgs = { data: { organizationId: new Types.ObjectId().toString(), userIds: [], - isGroup: true, + isGroup: false, }, };Also applies to: 63-66
103-107: LGTM: Test case updated correctly with a minor suggestion.The test case has been properly updated to use the new
MutationCreateChatArgstype andcreateChatresolver. The expectations have been correctly adjusted to match the new structure.Consider updating the test description to explicitly mention that it's testing direct chat creation:
-it(`creates the directChat and returns it`, async () => { +it(`creates a direct chat and returns it`, async () => {This change would make the test description more consistent with the new unified Chat entity structure while still clarifying the specific scenario being tested.
Also applies to: 114-115, 118-118, 120-126
Line range hint
146-151: Enhance group chat test expectations.The current expectations for the group chat test are identical to those for the direct chat test. To ensure that group chat-specific properties are verified, consider adding more detailed expectations.
Expand the expectations to include group chat-specific properties:
expect(createChatPayload).toEqual( expect.objectContaining({ creatorId: testUser?._id, users: [testUser?._id], isGroup: true, // Add any other group chat-specific properties here }), );This change will provide a more comprehensive test for group chat creation and help distinguish it from direct chat creation.
src/resolvers/Mutation/createChat.ts (1)
9-9: Correct the grammatical error in function documentationThe comment on Line 9 is grammatically incorrect. Consider rephrasing it for clarity.
Suggested change:
- * This function enables to create a chat. + * This function enables the creation of a chat.schema.graphql (1)
193-206: Ensure Consistent Use of Non-Null AssertionsIn the definition of the
Chattype, some fields do not specify whether they are nullable or non-nullable. For clarity and to prevent potential null reference errors, explicitly mark fields as non-nullable where appropriate.Apply this diff to specify non-nullable fields:
type Chat { _id: ID! admins: [User] createdAt: DateTime! creator: User image: String isGroup: Boolean! lastMessageId: String messages: [ChatMessage] name: String organization: Organization updatedAt: DateTime! - users: [User!]! + users: [User!]! }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- schema.graphql (6 hunks)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/createChat.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Mutation/createChat.spec.ts (4 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Subscription/messageSentToChat.spec.ts (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (17)
tests/resolvers/Subscription/messageSentToChat.spec.ts (8)
5-6: LGTM: Import statements updated correctly.The import statements have been appropriately updated to reflect the change from
DirectChatto a generalChatentity. This aligns well with the refactoring objectives.
8-8: LGTM: FilterFunction import path updated correctly.The import path for
filterFunctionhas been properly updated to reflect the new file structure, changing frommessageSentToDirectChattomessageSentToChat. This is consistent with the overall refactoring approach.
11-11: LGTM: Variable declaration updated correctly.The variable declaration has been appropriately updated from
testDirectChatMessagetotestChatMessage, with the correct type annotation ofTestChatMessageType. This change aligns well with the refactoring objectives.
16-18: LGTM: Test setup updated correctly in beforeAll hook.The test setup in the
beforeAllhook has been properly updated:
- The function call has been changed from
createTestDirectChatMessagetocreateTestChatMessage.- The assignment now uses the new variable name
testChatMessage.These changes are consistent with the overall refactoring approach.
24-28: LGTM: Describe block and import statement updated correctly.The changes in this segment are appropriate:
- The describe block title has been updated to "messageSentToChat".
- The import statement now correctly references "messageSentToChat".
These updates align well with the refactoring from
DirectChatto a generalChatentity.
34-34: LGTM: Test case updated correctly for new Chat structure.The changes in this test case are appropriate and consistent:
- The asyncIterator action has been updated to "MESSAGE_SENT_TO_CHAT".
- The payload structure now uses "messageSentToChat".
- All references to "messageSentToDirectChat" have been replaced with "messageSentToChat".
These updates accurately reflect the new Chat structure and maintain the integrity of the test case.
Also applies to: 44-45, 49-49, 51-51
57-59: LGTM: Import statement in second test case updated correctly.The import statement in the second test case has been properly updated to use "messageSentToChat" instead of "messageSentToDirectChat". This change is consistent with the overall refactoring approach and maintains consistency throughout the test file.
65-65: LGTM: Second test case updated correctly for new Chat structure.The changes in the second test case are appropriate and consistent:
- The asyncIterator action has been updated to "MESSAGE_SENT_TO_CHAT".
- The payload structure now uses "messageSentToChat".
- All references to "messageSentToDirectChat" have been replaced with "messageSentToChat".
These updates accurately reflect the new Chat structure and maintain consistency with the changes made in the first test case.
Also applies to: 76-77, 81-81, 83-83
tests/resolvers/Mutation/createChat.spec.ts (3)
4-4: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The import statement has been properly updated to reflect the new unified Chat entity structure.
40-40: LGTM: Test suite description updated.The describe block has been correctly updated to reflect the new unified Chat entity structure.
81-85: LGTM: Test case updated correctly.The test case has been properly updated to use the new
MutationCreateChatArgstype andcreateChatresolver. The addition of theisGroupproperty is correct.Also applies to: 93-96
schema.graphql (6)
214-214: Avoid Recursive Type in 'replyTo' Field to Prevent Excessive NestingSetting
replyToasChatMessagecan lead to deep recursive nesting when querying messages, which may cause performance issues. Consider usingIDas the type forreplyToto reference the parent message without nesting.
208-217: Consider Using an Enum for 'type' Field in 'ChatMessage'Using a
Stringfor thetypefield may introduce inconsistencies due to potential typos or varying input. Defining an enum for message types ensures type safety and restricts values to predefined options.Define the
MessageTypeenum:enum MessageType { TEXT IMAGE VIDEO FILE }Apply this diff to update the
typefield:type ChatMessage { _id: ID! chatMessageBelongsTo: Chat! createdAt: DateTime! deletedBy: [User] messageContent: String! replyTo: ChatMessage sender: User! - type: String! + type: MessageType! updatedAt: DateTime! }
1137-1137: Use 'MessageType' Enum for 'type' Parameter in 'sendMessageToChat' MutationReplacing the
Stringtype with theMessageTypeenum for thetypeparameter enhances validation and ensures only predefined message types are accepted.Apply this diff:
type Mutation { - sendMessageToChat(chatId: ID!, messageContent: String!, replyTo: ID, type: String!): ChatMessage! + sendMessageToChat(chatId: ID!, messageContent: String!, replyTo: ID, type: MessageType!): ChatMessage! ... }
1596-1596: Add Necessary Authentication Directives to 'messageSentToChat' SubscriptionTo prevent unauthorized access to chat messages via subscriptions, ensure the
messageSentToChatsubscription is protected with proper authentication directives.Apply this diff to add the
@authdirective:type Subscription { - messageSentToChat(userId: ID!): ChatMessage + messageSentToChat(userId: ID!): ChatMessage @auth ... }
2013-2016: Include 'organizationId' and 'userIds' in 'chatInput' for CompletenessThe
chatInputtype appears incomplete. To support organization-specific chats and specify participants, includeorganizationIdanduserIdsfields.Apply this diff:
input chatInput { image: String isGroup: Boolean! name: String + organizationId: ID + userIds: [ID!]! }
214-214: Update 'replyTo' Field Type in 'ChatMessage'To prevent recursive data fetching issues, change the
replyTofield type fromChatMessagetoID.Apply this diff:
type ChatMessage { ... - replyTo: ChatMessage + replyTo: ID ... }
| it(`creates the groupChat and returns it`, async () => { | ||
| const args: MutationCreateChatArgs = { | ||
| data: { | ||
| organizationId: testOrganization?.id, | ||
| userIds: [testUser?.id], | ||
| isGroup: false, | ||
| }, | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| const context = { | ||
| userId: testUser?.id, | ||
| }; | ||
| const { createChat: createChatResolver } = await import( | ||
| "../../../src/resolvers/Mutation/createChat" | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| const createChatPayload = await createChatResolver?.({}, args, context); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good addition of group chat test case, but there's an inconsistency.
The addition of a test case for group chat creation is excellent as it covers the new functionality. However, there's an inconsistency in the isGroup property value.
The isGroup property is set to false, which contradicts the test description of creating a group chat. Please update the property value:
const args: MutationCreateChatArgs = {
data: {
organizationId: testOrganization?.id,
userIds: [testUser?.id],
- isGroup: false,
+ isGroup: true,
},
};This change will ensure that the test correctly creates a group chat as intended.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| it(`creates the groupChat and returns it`, async () => { | |
| const args: MutationCreateChatArgs = { | |
| data: { | |
| organizationId: testOrganization?.id, | |
| userIds: [testUser?.id], | |
| isGroup: false, | |
| }, | |
| }; | |
| const context = { | |
| userId: testUser?.id, | |
| }; | |
| const { createChat: createChatResolver } = await import( | |
| "../../../src/resolvers/Mutation/createChat" | |
| ); | |
| const createChatPayload = await createChatResolver?.({}, args, context); | |
| it(`creates the groupChat and returns it`, async () => { | |
| const args: MutationCreateChatArgs = { | |
| data: { | |
| organizationId: testOrganization?.id, | |
| userIds: [testUser?.id], | |
| isGroup: true, | |
| }, | |
| }; | |
| const context = { | |
| userId: testUser?.id, | |
| }; | |
| const { createChat: createChatResolver } = await import( | |
| "../../../src/resolvers/Mutation/createChat" | |
| ); | |
| const createChatPayload = await createChatResolver?.({}, args, context); |
| creatorId: context.userId, | ||
| users: args.data.userIds, | ||
| organization: args.data.organizationId, | ||
| name: args.data?.name, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure name is provided for group chats
In the group chat payload (Line 63), you're using optional chaining with args.data?.name, implying that name is optional. For group chats, a name is typically required to identify the chat effectively. Consider adding validation to ensure that args.data.name is provided when creating a group chat.
Here's how you can add the validation:
+ if (args.data.isGroup && !args.data.name) {
+ throw new errors.ValidationError(
+ 'Group chat name is required.',
+ 'GROUP_CHAT_NAME_REQUIRED',
+ );
+ }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 12
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
tests/resolvers/Mutation/sendMessageToChat.spec.ts (2)
Line range hint
132-140: Redundant addition of test user to 'users' arrayThe user
testUsers[0]?._idis already included intestChat.userswhen the chat is created at lines 60-64. Adding it again withChat.updateOneis unnecessary and may lead to duplicate entries.Consider removing this update or ensuring that duplicates are not added:
-await Chat.updateOne( - { - _id: testChat._id, - }, - { - $push: { - users: testUsers[0]?._id, - }, - }, -);
Line range hint
150-160: Simplify the mockpubsub.publishmethodThe
publishmethod in thepubsubmock can be simplified. Currently, it defines return types unnecessarily. Since it's a mock, you can use a jest mock function or simplify the return statement.Consider simplifying the method:
- publish: ( - _action: "MESSAGE_SENT_TO_CHAT", - _payload: { - messageSentToChat: InterfaceChatMessage; - }, - ): { - _action: string; - _payload: { messageSentToChat: InterfaceChatMessage }; - } => { - return { _action, _payload }; - }, + publish: vi.fn(),
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- schema.graphql (6 hunks)
- src/typeDefs/mutations.ts (2 hunks)
- src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (20 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Mutation/sendMessageToChat.spec.ts (7 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Subscription/messageSentToChat.spec.ts (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (2)
<retrieved_learning>
Learnt from: disha1202
PR: #2466
File: src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts:3096-3101
Timestamp: 2024-09-22T09:37:15.069Z
Learning: Direct chats do not need to be associated with any organization, so theorganizationIdfield inChatInputremains optional.
</retrieved_learning><retrieved_learning>
Learnt from: disha1202
PR: #2466
File: src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts:3096-3101
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T16:13:41.996Z
Learning: Direct chats do not need to be associated with any organization, so theorganizationIdfield inChatInputremains optional.
</retrieved_learning>
🔇 Additional comments (14)
src/typeDefs/mutations.ts (3)
87-87: Summary: Changes align well with PR objectivesThe modifications in this file successfully consolidate the chat-related mutations:
- The new
createChatmutation provides a unified way to create chats.- The updated
sendMessageToChatmutation now supports both direct and group chats, with added functionality for threaded conversations.These changes lay a solid foundation for a more flexible and unified chat system in the Talawa API.
Also applies to: 235-239
235-239: LGTM! Verify theChatMessagetype definition.The modifications to the
sendMessageToChatmutation align well with the PR objectives:
- The unified
ChatMessage!return type supports the consolidated chat approach.- The new optional
replyTo: IDparameter adds support for threaded conversations.These changes should improve the flexibility and functionality of the chat system.
To ensure consistency, please verify the
ChatMessagetype definition:
87-87: LGTM! Verify thechatInputtype definition.The addition of the
createChatmutation aligns well with the PR objective of consolidating chat types. This unified approach should simplify chat creation across the application.To ensure completeness, please verify the
chatInputtype definition:✅ Verification successful
Verified the
chatInputtype definition.The
chatInputtype is correctly defined to handle both direct and group chat scenarios, aligning with the PR objectives.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the chatInput type definition # Test: Search for the chatInput type definition. Expect: Definition covering both direct and group chat scenarios. rg --type graphql 'input chatInput'Length of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the chatInput type definition across all files # Test: Search for the chatInput type definition. Expect: Definition covering both direct and group chat scenarios. rg 'input chatInput'Length of output: 98
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the chatInput type definition from schema.graphql # Test: Retrieve the chatInput definition to verify it includes fields for direct and group chats. sed -n '/input chatInput {/,/}/p' schema.graphqlLength of output: 160
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the chatInput type definition from src/typeDefs/inputs.ts # Test: Retrieve the chatInput definition to verify it includes fields for direct and group chats. sed -n '/input chatInput {/,/}/p' src/typeDefs/inputs.tsLength of output: 182
tests/resolvers/Subscription/messageSentToChat.spec.ts (1)
46-46: EnsuretestChatMessageis defined before accessing its propertiesUsing optional chaining with
testChatMessage?.chatMessageBelongsTosuggests thattestChatMessagemight beundefined. SincetestChatMessageshould be initialized in thebeforeAllhook, verify that it is properly defined to prevent unexpected runtime errors.Run the tests to confirm that
testChatMessageis initialized correctly and that no null or undefined values are causing issues.Also applies to: 78-78
tests/resolvers/Mutation/sendMessageToChat.spec.ts (5)
5-7: Imports updated correctlyThe import statements have been correctly updated to reflect the new
Chatmodel and associated types.
167-171: Verify that the resolver returns the expected payloadEnsure that the
sendMessageToChatResolverreturns the correct payload, and consider adding assertions to verify all relevant fields like timestamps and any additional properties.Would you like me to assist in enhancing the test assertions to cover more fields?
111-111:⚠️ Potential issueUpdate test description to reference 'Chat' instead of 'directChat'
The test description should be updated to reflect the new
Chatmodel.Apply this diff to update the test description:
-it(`throws NotFoundError current user with _id === context.userId does not exist`, async () => { +it(`throws NotFoundError if current user with _id === context.userId does not exist`, async () => {Likely invalid or redundant comment.
87-87:⚠️ Potential issueUpdate test description to reference 'Chat' instead of 'directChat'
The test description mentions
directChat, which should be updated tochatto reflect the unified chat model.Apply this diff to update the test description:
-it(`throws NotFoundError if no directChat exists with _id === args.chatId`, async () => { +it(`throws NotFoundError if no chat exists with _id === args.chatId`, async () => {Likely invalid or redundant comment.
84-84:⚠️ Potential issueUpdate test suite name to reflect 'sendMessageToChat'
The
describeblock referencessendMessageToDirectChat. It should be updated tosendMessageToChatto reflect the updated function name and maintain consistency.Apply this diff to update the test suite name:
-describe("resolvers -> Mutation -> sendMessageToDirectChat", () => { +describe("resolvers -> Mutation -> sendMessageToChat", () => {Likely invalid or redundant comment.
schema.graphql (1)
1596-1596:⚠️ Potential issueProtect 'messageSentToChat' subscription with authentication
To prevent unauthorized access to chat messages via subscriptions, add the
@authdirective to themessageSentToChatsubscription. This ensures that only authenticated users can subscribe to chat messages.Apply this diff:
type Subscription { - messageSentToChat(userId: ID!): ChatMessage + messageSentToChat(userId: ID!): ChatMessage @auth onPluginUpdate: Plugin }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (4)
13-14: Imports for Chat models are correctly addedThe
InterfaceChatandInterfaceChatMessageimports are properly included to support the newChatandChatMessagetypes.
1688-1691:sendMessageToChatmutation arguments are correctly definedThe arguments for the
sendMessageToChatmutation are properly specified, withchatIdandmessageContentas required fields, andreplyToas an optional field.
3095-3100:ChatInputfields are correctly definedThe
ChatInputtype appropriately defines its fields, withorganizationIdremaining optional to accommodate direct chats that are not associated with any organization.
2638-2638: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionConsider making
messageSentToChatnon-nullableIn the
Subscriptiontype, themessageSentToChatfield is currently optional. If the subscription always emits aChatMessagewhen triggered, consider making it non-nullable to accurately represent its behavior.Apply this diff to update the
messageSentToChatfield:export type Subscription = { - messageSentToChat?: Maybe<ChatMessage>; + messageSentToChat: ChatMessage; onPluginUpdate?: Maybe<Plugin>; };Likely invalid or redundant comment.
| messageSentToChatPayload.payload = payload; | ||
| // @ts-expect-error-ignore | ||
| const x = messageSentToDirectChatPayload?.subscribe( | ||
| _parent, | ||
| _args, | ||
| context, | ||
| ); | ||
| const x = messageSentToChatPayload?.subscribe(_parent, _args, context); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Address TypeScript errors instead of ignoring them
Using // @ts-expect-error-ignore suppresses TypeScript errors, potentially hiding underlying issues. It's better to resolve these errors to maintain type safety and code quality.
Consider updating the code or type definitions to eliminate the need for ignoring errors. For example, ensure that messageSentToChatPayload has the correct type that includes a payload property.
Also applies to: 82-84
| }); | ||
| afterAll(async () => { | ||
| await disconnect(MONGOOSE_INSTANCE); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| describe("src -> resolvers -> Subscription -> messageSentToDirectChat", () => { | ||
| describe("src -> resolvers -> Subscription -> messageSentToChat", () => { | ||
| it("subscription filter function returns true if CurrentUser is receiveror sender", async () => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct the typo in the test description
There's a typo in the test description: "receiveror" should be "receiver or sender".
Apply this diff to fix the typo:
describe("src -> resolvers -> Subscription -> messageSentToChat", () => {
- it("subscription filter function returns true if CurrentUser is receiveror sender", async () => {
+ it("subscription filter function returns true if CurrentUser is receiver or sender", async () => {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| it("subscription filter function returns true if CurrentUser is receiveror sender", async () => { | |
| it("subscription filter function returns true if CurrentUser is receiver or sender", async () => { |
|
|
||
| // If current User is sender | ||
| payload.messageSentToDirectChat.receiver = "receiver"; | ||
| expect(await filterFunction(payload, variables)).toBe(true); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update test description to reflect the change from DirectChat to Chat
The test description still references "DirectChat". Since the code now uses a unified Chat entity, the description should be updated for consistency.
Apply this diff to update the test description:
});
- it("user is not notified if it is not a part of DirectChat", async () => {
+ it("user is not notified if it is not a part of Chat", async () => {Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| const resultArray = await createTestChatMessage(); | ||
| testCurrentUser = resultArray[0]; | ||
| testDirectChatMessage = resultArray[3]; | ||
| testChatMessage = resultArray[3]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor to destructure resultArray for better readability
Accessing elements in resultArray using indices reduces code clarity and can lead to maintenance issues. Destructuring the array enhances readability by explicitly naming the variables.
Apply this diff to destructure resultArray:
const resultArray = await createTestChatMessage();
- testCurrentUser = resultArray[0];
- testChatMessage = resultArray[3];
+ const [testCurrentUser, , , testChatMessage] = resultArray;Alternatively, consider modifying createTestChatMessage to return an object with named properties for improved clarity.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const resultArray = await createTestChatMessage(); | |
| testCurrentUser = resultArray[0]; | |
| testDirectChatMessage = resultArray[3]; | |
| testChatMessage = resultArray[3]; | |
| const resultArray = await createTestChatMessage(); | |
| const [testCurrentUser, , , testChatMessage] = resultArray; |
| createdAt: "23456789", | ||
| updatedAt: "23456789", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use valid Date objects for 'createdAt' and 'updatedAt' fields
Assigning the string "23456789" to createdAt and updatedAt is not appropriate, as these fields are expected to be Date objects. This could lead to inconsistencies or errors when the dates are used.
Apply this diff to assign the current date:
- createdAt: "23456789",
- updatedAt: "23456789",
+ createdAt: new Date(),
+ updatedAt: new Date(),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| createdAt: "23456789", | |
| updatedAt: "23456789", | |
| createdAt: new Date(), | |
| updatedAt: new Date(), |
| const { sendMessageToChat: sendMessageToChatResolver } = await import( | ||
| "../../../src/resolvers/Mutation/sendMessageToChat" | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid redundant import of sendMessageToChatResolver
The sendMessageToChatResolver is re-imported here but has already been imported earlier within this test file. Consider reusing the existing import or consolidating imports to improve clarity.
Apply this diff if you choose to remove the redundant import:
-const { sendMessageToChat: sendMessageToChatResolver } = await import(
- "../../../src/resolvers/Mutation/sendMessageToChat"
-);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const { sendMessageToChat: sendMessageToChatResolver } = await import( | |
| "../../../src/resolvers/Mutation/sendMessageToChat" | |
| ); |
| type Chat { | ||
| _id: ID! | ||
| admins: [User] | ||
| createdAt: DateTime! | ||
| creator: User | ||
| image: String | ||
| isGroup: Boolean! | ||
| lastMessageId: String | ||
| messages: [ChatMessage] | ||
| name: String | ||
| organization: Organization | ||
| updatedAt: DateTime! | ||
| users: [User!]! | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Change 'lastMessageId' field type from 'String' to 'ID'
The lastMessageId field represents the ID of the last message in the chat. For consistency and better type safety, consider changing its type from String to ID.
Apply this diff:
type Chat {
_id: ID!
admins: [User]
createdAt: DateTime!
creator: User
image: String
isGroup: Boolean!
- lastMessageId: String
+ lastMessageId: ID
messages: [ChatMessage]
name: String
organization: Organization
updatedAt: DateTime!
users: [User!]!
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| type Chat { | |
| _id: ID! | |
| admins: [User] | |
| createdAt: DateTime! | |
| creator: User | |
| image: String | |
| isGroup: Boolean! | |
| lastMessageId: String | |
| messages: [ChatMessage] | |
| name: String | |
| organization: Organization | |
| updatedAt: DateTime! | |
| users: [User!]! | |
| } | |
| type Chat { | |
| _id: ID! | |
| admins: [User] | |
| createdAt: DateTime! | |
| creator: User | |
| image: String | |
| isGroup: Boolean! | |
| lastMessageId: ID | |
| messages: [ChatMessage] | |
| name: String | |
| organization: Organization | |
| updatedAt: DateTime! | |
| users: [User!]! | |
| } |
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Implement pagination for the 'messages' field in 'Chat' type
Fetching all messages in a chat at once can lead to performance issues, especially for chats with a large number of messages. Consider implementing pagination to improve scalability and efficiency.
Apply this diff to modify the messages field:
type Chat {
_id: ID!
admins: [User]
createdAt: DateTime!
creator: User
image: String
isGroup: Boolean!
lastMessageId: ID
- messages: [ChatMessage]
+ messages(first: Int, after: String): ChatMessageConnection
name: String
organization: Organization
updatedAt: DateTime!
users: [User!]!
}
+type ChatMessageConnection {
+ edges: [ChatMessageEdge]
+ pageInfo: PageInfo!
+}
+
+type ChatMessageEdge {
+ cursor: String!
+ node: ChatMessage
+}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| admins?: Maybe<Array<Maybe<User>>>; | ||
| createdAt: Scalars['DateTime']['output']; | ||
| creator?: Maybe<User>; | ||
| image?: Maybe<Scalars['String']['output']>; | ||
| isGroup: Scalars['Boolean']['output']; | ||
| lastMessageId?: Maybe<Scalars['String']['output']>; | ||
| messages?: Maybe<Array<Maybe<ChatMessage>>>; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refine types in the Chat type definition
In the Chat type, consider the following refinements:
-
Change
lastMessageIdtype toID: ThelastMessageIdfield is currently of typeScalars['String']['output']. Since it likely references aChatMessageID, changing its type toScalars['ID']['output']would enhance clarity and consistency. -
Simplify optional array types: The fields
adminsandmessagesare defined asMaybe<Array<Maybe<User>>>andMaybe<Array<Maybe<ChatMessage>>>, respectively. Unless individual array elements can benull, consider simplifying these types toMaybe<Array<User>>andMaybe<Array<ChatMessage>>.
Apply this diff to implement the suggested changes:
export type Chat = {
__typename?: 'Chat';
_id: Scalars['ID']['output'];
- admins?: Maybe<Array<Maybe<User>>>;
+ admins?: Maybe<Array<User>>;
createdAt: Scalars['DateTime']['output'];
creator?: Maybe<User>;
image?: Maybe<Scalars['String']['output']>;
isGroup: Scalars['Boolean']['output'];
- lastMessageId?: Maybe<Scalars['String']['output']>;
+ lastMessageId?: Maybe<Scalars['ID']['output']>;
- messages?: Maybe<Array<Maybe<ChatMessage>>>;
+ messages?: Maybe<Array<ChatMessage>>;
name?: Maybe<Scalars['String']['output']>;
organization?: Maybe<Organization>;
updatedAt: Scalars['DateTime']['output'];
users: Array<User>;
};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| admins?: Maybe<Array<Maybe<User>>>; | |
| createdAt: Scalars['DateTime']['output']; | |
| creator?: Maybe<User>; | |
| image?: Maybe<Scalars['String']['output']>; | |
| isGroup: Scalars['Boolean']['output']; | |
| lastMessageId?: Maybe<Scalars['String']['output']>; | |
| messages?: Maybe<Array<Maybe<ChatMessage>>>; | |
| admins?: Maybe<Array<User>>; | |
| createdAt: Scalars['DateTime']['output']; | |
| creator?: Maybe<User>; | |
| image?: Maybe<Scalars['String']['output']>; | |
| isGroup: Scalars['Boolean']['output']; | |
| lastMessageId?: Maybe<Scalars['ID']['output']>; | |
| messages?: Maybe<Array<ChatMessage>>; |
| @@ -2276,12 +2196,11 @@ | |||
| agendaItemByEvent?: Maybe<Array<Maybe<AgendaItem>>>; | |||
| agendaItemByOrganization?: Maybe<Array<Maybe<AgendaItem>>>; | |||
| agendaItemCategoriesByOrganization?: Maybe<Array<Maybe<AgendaCategory>>>; | |||
| chatById: Chat; | |||
| chatsByUserId?: Maybe<Array<Maybe<Chat>>>; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify optional types in chatsByUserId field
The chatsByUserId query returns Maybe<Array<Maybe<Chat>>>. Unless individual chats in the array can be null, consider simplifying the type to Maybe<Array<Chat>> to enhance readability.
Apply this diff to update the chatsByUserId field:
export type Query = {
// ... other fields ...
chatById: Chat;
- chatsByUserId?: Maybe<Array<Maybe<Chat>>>;
+ chatsByUserId?: Maybe<Array<Chat>>;
// ... other fields ...
};Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| deletedBy?: Maybe<Array<Maybe<User>>>; | ||
| messageContent: Scalars['String']['output']; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify optional types in deletedBy field
In the ChatMessage type, the deletedBy field is defined as Maybe<Array<Maybe<User>>>. Unless there are cases where elements within the deletedBy array can be null, consider simplifying the type to Maybe<Array<User>> for consistency and clarity.
Apply this diff to update the deletedBy field:
export type ChatMessage = {
__typename?: 'ChatMessage';
_id: Scalars['ID']['output'];
chatMessageBelongsTo: Chat;
createdAt: Scalars['DateTime']['output'];
- deletedBy?: Maybe<Array<Maybe<User>>>;
+ deletedBy?: Maybe<Array<User>>;
messageContent: Scalars['String']['output'];
replyTo?: Maybe<ChatMessage>;
sender: User;
updatedAt: Scalars['DateTime']['output'];
};Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
|
Hi @DMills27 |
|
@disha1202 Please fix the conflicting files. It seems this is due to the PR I recently merged. I'll try to revert it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
tests/resolvers/ChatMessage/sender.spec.ts (3)
17-18: LGTM: Test setup updated correctly, with a minor suggestion.The
beforeAllhook has been updated to usecreateTestChatMessageinstead ofcreateTestDirectChatMessage, which is consistent with the refactoring. The assignment totestChatMessageis correct, using the fourth element of the returned array.Consider destructuring the array for improved readability:
const [,,, testChatMessage] = await createTestChatMessage();This makes it clearer that we're intentionally using the fourth element of the returned array.
44-49: LGTM: Second test case updated correctly, with a minor suggestion.The second test case has been successfully updated to use
testChatMessageinstead oftestDirectChatMessage. Theparentobject is now correctly created fromtestChatMessage, maintaining the original test logic while adapting to the newChatMessagestructure.For consistency with the first test case, consider moving the null check for
parentbefore its usage:if (testChatMessage?._id) { const parent = testChatMessage.toObject(); if (!parent) { throw new Error("Parent object is undefined."); } parent._id = testChatMessage._id; parent.sender = new Types.ObjectId(); // Set to a non-existing ObjectId try { // ... rest of the test case } catch (error: unknown) { // ... error handling } }This change would make the error handling more consistent between the two test cases.
Also applies to: 51-53, 55-61
Line range hint
1-67: Overall consistency is good, with a minor suggestion for the describe block.The file has been successfully updated to reflect the change from
DirectChatMessagetoChatMessage. All references have been consistently updated, and the test logic has been preserved while adapting to the new structure.Update the describe block to reflect the new
ChatMessagestructure:describe("resolvers -> ChatMessage -> sender", () => { // ... existing test cases });This change would make the describe block consistent with the new
ChatMessagenaming convention used throughout the file.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- tests/resolvers/ChatMessage/sender.spec.ts (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
tests/resolvers/ChatMessage/sender.spec.ts (4)
2-2: LGTM: Import path updated correctly.The import path for the
senderresolver has been updated to reflect the newChatMessagestructure, which is consistent with the refactoring fromDirectChatMessageto a more genericChatMessage.
7-8: LGTM: Test helper imports updated correctly.The imports for
TestChatMessageTypeandcreateTestChatMessagehave been updated to reflect the new chat message structure. This change is consistent with the overall refactoring fromDirectChatMessagetoChatMessage.
12-12: LGTM: Test variable declaration updated correctly.The test variable declaration has been updated from
testDirectChatMessagetotestChatMessage, with the corresponding type change toTestChatMessageType. This change aligns with the refactoring to a more genericChatMessagestructure.
27-27: LGTM: Test case updated correctly.The first test case has been updated to use
testChatMessageinstead oftestDirectChatMessage. Theparentobject is now correctly created fromtestChatMessage, and the user lookup usestestChatMessage.sender. These changes are consistent with the refactoring to a more genericChatMessagestructure while maintaining the original test logic.Also applies to: 34-34
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
eslint.config.mjs (1)
113-113: Unnecessary addition of@typescript-eslintplugin for GraphQL filesIn the configuration for
.graphqlfiles, the@typescript-eslintplugin has been added:plugins: { "@typescript-eslint": typescriptEslint, },Since
.graphqlfiles are not TypeScript files, including the@typescript-eslintplugin may be unnecessary and could lead to linting issues or confusion. Consider removing the@typescript-eslintplugin from this configuration to keep the linting process accurate and efficient.
eslint.config.mjs
Outdated
| }, | ||
|
|
||
| languageOptions: { | ||
| parser: parser, | ||
| parser: tsParser, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Incorrect parser specified for GraphQL files
The tsParser (TypeScript parser) is set as the parser for .graphql files:
languageOptions: {
parser: tsParser,
},Using tsParser for GraphQL files may not be appropriate because .graphql files are not written in TypeScript. This could result in parsing errors or incorrect linting results. Consider using a GraphQL-specific parser or removing the parser specification for this file type if it's not needed.
Apply this diff to correct the parser configuration:
languageOptions: {
- parser: tsParser,
},
|
|
Hi @palisadoes Updated the PR, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
src/typeDefs/mutations.ts (3)
87-87: LGTM! Consider adding a description comment.The addition of the
createChatmutation aligns well with the PR objective of consolidating chat types. It provides a flexible approach to chat creation using the genericchatInputtype.Consider adding a brief description comment above the mutation to explain its purpose and usage, similar to other mutations in this file. For example:
# Creates a new chat (either direct or group) based on the provided input createChat(data: chatInput!): Chat
235-239: LGTM! Consider updating the mutation description.The modifications to the
sendMessageToChatmutation are well-aligned with the PR objectives:
- The addition of the optional
replyToparameter enables message threading.- The return type change to
ChatMessage!reflects the consolidated chat structure.Consider updating or adding a description comment for this mutation to reflect its expanded functionality. For example:
# Sends a message to a chat (direct or group) with optional reply functionality sendMessageToChat( chatId: ID! messageContent: String! replyTo: ID ): ChatMessage! @auth
Line range hint
1-339: Overall changes align well with PR objectivesThe modifications to the mutations in this file effectively implement the consolidation of chat types:
- Removal of separate direct and group chat mutations (
createDirectChat,removeDirectChat,removeGroupChat,sendMessageToDirectChat, etc.).- Introduction of a unified
createChatmutation.- Update of
sendMessageToChatto handle both direct and group chats with added reply functionality.These changes simplify the API and provide a more flexible approach to chat management. The new structure should make it easier to maintain and extend chat functionality in the future.
As the chat system evolves, consider the following:
- Ensure that the
chatInputtype is comprehensive enough to handle all chat creation scenarios.- Update related resolvers and services to properly handle the new unified chat structure.
- Review and update any client-side code that may be affected by these API changes.
src/typeDefs/inputs.ts (2)
19-24: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The new
chatInputtype effectively combines DirectChat and GroupChat functionalities, aligning well with the PR objectives. The structure is flexible and accommodates both direct and group chat scenarios.Consider adding a brief comment above the
chatInputtype to explain its dual purpose:""" Input type for creating or updating a chat, supporting both direct and group chats. """ input chatInput { # ... existing fields ... }This comment would enhance clarity for developers using this input type in the future.
Line range hint
26-30: Clarify the role ofcreateGroupChatInputor consider removing it.With the introduction of the new
chatInputtype that handles both direct and group chats, the presence ofcreateGroupChatInputmight lead to confusion and potential inconsistencies.Consider one of the following actions:
- If
createGroupChatInputis no longer in use, remove it to avoid confusion.- If it's still needed, add a comment explaining its specific use case and how it differs from
chatInput.- If it's meant to be deprecated, mark it as such and provide migration instructions to use
chatInputinstead.Example of deprecation:
""" @deprecated Use `chatInput` with `isGroup: true` instead. This input type will be removed in a future version. """ input createGroupChatInput { # ... existing fields ... }Clarifying or removing this input type will ensure consistency and prevent potential maintenance issues in the future.
src/constants.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-1023: Consider refactoring constants for improved maintainability.While the addition of
MESSAGE_NOT_FOUND_ERRORis appropriate, I've noticed that this file contains a large number of constants. To improve maintainability and readability, consider the following suggestions:
- Group related constants into separate files (e.g.,
errorConstants.ts,configConstants.ts, etc.).- Use enums for related constant groups where applicable.
- Consider using a more structured approach for error constants, such as a class-based system that allows for easy internationalization and consistent error handling.
Here's an example of how you might start refactoring:
// errorConstants.ts export enum ErrorCode { NOT_FOUND = 'notFound', ALREADY_EXISTS = 'alreadyExists', UNAUTHORIZED = 'unauthorized', // ... other error codes } export class AppError { constructor( public code: ErrorCode, public message: string, public param: string ) {} static MESSAGE_NOT_FOUND = new AppError( ErrorCode.NOT_FOUND, 'Message not found', 'message' ); // ... other error constants } // Usage throw AppError.MESSAGE_NOT_FOUND;This approach would make the constants more maintainable and easier to use consistently throughout the application.
src/typeDefs/types.ts (1)
721-734: Make theadminsField Non-Nullable for Better Type SafetyThe
adminsfield is defined as[User], which allows the list or its elements to benull. If a chat should always have anadminslist (even if empty) and each admin should be a validUser, consider defining the field as[User!]!to enhance type safety and prevent potentialnullvalues.Apply this diff to update the field type:
admins: [User] +admins: [User!]!
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
- eslint.config.mjs (0 hunks)
- schema.graphql (6 hunks)
- src/constants.ts (1 hunks)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/index.ts (4 hunks)
- src/typeDefs/inputs.ts (1 hunks)
- src/typeDefs/mutations.ts (2 hunks)
- src/typeDefs/types.ts (1 hunks)
- src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (20 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- eslint.config.mjs
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (2)
<retrieved_learning>
Learnt from: disha1202
PR: #2466
File: src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts:3096-3101
Timestamp: 2024-09-22T09:37:15.069Z
Learning: Direct chats do not need to be associated with any organization, so theorganizationIdfield inChatInputremains optional.
</retrieved_learning><retrieved_learning>
Learnt from: disha1202
PR: #2466
File: src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts:3096-3101
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T16:13:41.996Z
Learning: Direct chats do not need to be associated with any organization, so theorganizationIdfield inChatInputremains optional.
</retrieved_learning>
🔇 Additional comments (11)
src/resolvers/Mutation/index.ts (3)
25-25: LGTM: Import changes align with PR objectives.The addition of
createChatandsendMessageToChatimports, along with the removal of separate direct and group chat imports (not visible in the diff), aligns well with the PR objective of consolidating chat functionality. This change supports the transition to a unified Chat entity.Also applies to: 84-84
Line range hint
1-235: Summary: Changes align well with PR objectives.The modifications to
src/resolvers/Mutation/index.tseffectively support the consolidation of chat functionality:
- Removal of separate direct and group chat imports and exports.
- Addition of unified
createChatandsendMessageToChatimports and exports.These changes are minimal, focused, and consistent with the PR objective of merging DirectChat and GroupChat into a single Chat entity. The file maintains its original purpose as a central point for mutation resolvers, reducing the risk of unintended side effects.
146-146: LGTM: Export changes support unified chat structure.The addition of
createChatandsendMessageToChatexports in theMutationobject, coupled with the removal of separate direct and group chat exports (not visible in the diff), effectively supports the new unified chat structure. This change is consistent with the PR objectives.To ensure all necessary chat-related mutations are accounted for, please run the following verification script:
Also applies to: 202-202
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Chat-related mutations are correctly updated.
The new mutations
createChatandsendMessageToChatare present in theMutationobject, and the old mutations have been successfully removed. This confirms that the export changes effectively support the unified chat structure as intended.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all necessary chat-related mutations are present and no old mutations remain. # Test: Check for the presence of new chat mutations and absence of old ones echo "Checking for new chat mutations:" grep -n "createChat" src/resolvers/Mutation/index.ts grep -n "sendMessageToChat" src/resolvers/Mutation/index.ts echo "Checking for absence of old chat mutations:" grep -n "createDirectChat" src/resolvers/Mutation/index.ts grep -n "createGroupChat" src/resolvers/Mutation/index.ts grep -n "sendMessageToDirectChat" src/resolvers/Mutation/index.ts grep -n "sendMessageToGroupChat" src/resolvers/Mutation/index.tsLength of output: 681
src/constants.ts (1)
67-72: LGTM! New error constant added for message not found scenario.The new
MESSAGE_NOT_FOUND_ERRORconstant is well-structured and consistent with other error constants in the file. This addition aligns with the chat system updates mentioned in the PR objectives.To ensure this new constant is being utilized correctly, please run the following script to check its usage in chat-related files:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Complete:
MESSAGE_NOT_FOUND_ERRORis properly utilized across relevant files.No issues found regarding the usage of the new error constant.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check usage of MESSAGE_NOT_FOUND_ERROR in chat-related files # Search for MESSAGE_NOT_FOUND_ERROR in all .ts files echo "Searching for MESSAGE_NOT_FOUND_ERROR usage:" rg "MESSAGE_NOT_FOUND_ERROR" --type ts # Search for potential spots where MESSAGE_NOT_FOUND_ERROR should be used echo "\nPotential spots where MESSAGE_NOT_FOUND_ERROR might be needed:" rg "message.*not.*found" --type tsLength of output: 1432
src/typeDefs/types.ts (1)
736-745: Clarify the Purpose and Usage of thedeletedByFieldThe
deletedByfield in theChatMessagetype is defined as[User], suggesting that multiple users can delete the same message independently, affecting their view of the chat. Please verify if the intended behavior is to support per-user message deletion (soft deletion) or global deletion.To confirm how
deletedByis used across the codebase, you can run the following script:This will help determine if the implementation aligns with the desired message deletion functionality.
schema.graphql (2)
193-206: Well-structured 'Chat' type with essential fieldsThe
Chattype is appropriately defined, including all necessary fields for chat functionality. The use of non-nullable types where necessary enhances data integrity.
1602-1602:⚠️ Potential issueAdd authentication directive to 'messageSentToChat' subscription
To secure the subscription and prevent unauthorized access to chat messages, include the
@authdirective.Apply this diff:
type Subscription { - messageSentToChat(userId: ID!): ChatMessage + messageSentToChat(userId: ID!): ChatMessage @auth ... }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (4)
13-14: Imports for Chat Models Added CorrectlyThe new chat models
InterfaceChatandInterfaceChatMessageare imported appropriately.
265-279:ChatType Definition Aligns with Unified SchemaThe
Chattype is well-defined and reflects the consolidation of direct and group chats into a single entity.
281-291:ChatMessageType Defined AccuratelyThe
ChatMessagetype correctly represents messages within the unified chat structure.
3106-3109:ChatInputType Includes Necessary FieldsThe
ChatInputtype provides the required fields for creating both group and direct chats.
| type Chat { | ||
| _id: ID! | ||
| isGroup: Boolean! | ||
| name: String | ||
| createdAt: DateTime! | ||
| creator: User | ||
| messages: [ChatMessage] | ||
| organization: Organization | ||
| updatedAt: DateTime! | ||
| users: [User!]! | ||
| admins: [User] | ||
| lastMessageId: String | ||
| image: String | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure Consistent Use of ID Type for Identifiers
The lastMessageId field in the Chat type is currently defined as String. Since it represents an identifier for a message, consider changing its type to ID for consistency and clarity.
Apply this diff to update the field type:
lastMessageId: String
+lastMessageId: ID📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| type Chat { | |
| _id: ID! | |
| isGroup: Boolean! | |
| name: String | |
| createdAt: DateTime! | |
| creator: User | |
| messages: [ChatMessage] | |
| organization: Organization | |
| updatedAt: DateTime! | |
| users: [User!]! | |
| admins: [User] | |
| lastMessageId: String | |
| image: String | |
| } | |
| type Chat { | |
| _id: ID! | |
| isGroup: Boolean! | |
| name: String | |
| createdAt: DateTime! | |
| creator: User | |
| messages: [ChatMessage] | |
| organization: Organization | |
| updatedAt: DateTime! | |
| users: [User!]! | |
| admins: [User] | |
| lastMessageId: ID | |
| image: String | |
| } |
| type ChatMessage { | ||
| _id: ID! | ||
| chatMessageBelongsTo: Chat! | ||
| createdAt: DateTime! | ||
| deletedBy: [User] | ||
| messageContent: String! | ||
| replyTo: ChatMessage | ||
| sender: User! | ||
| updatedAt: DateTime! | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding a 'type' field to 'ChatMessage' for message categorization
Including a type field in the ChatMessage type can help categorize messages (e.g., TEXT, IMAGE, VIDEO). This enhances flexibility and allows clients to handle different message types appropriately.
Define the MessageType enum:
enum MessageType {
TEXT
IMAGE
VIDEO
FILE
}Update the ChatMessage type:
type ChatMessage {
_id: ID!
chatMessageBelongsTo: Chat!
createdAt: DateTime!
deletedBy: [User]
messageContent: String!
replyTo: ChatMessage
sender: User!
updatedAt: DateTime!
+ type: MessageType!
}| removeUserFromUserFamily(familyId: ID!, userId: ID!): UserFamily! | ||
| removeUserImage: User! | ||
| removeUserTag(id: ID!): UserTag | ||
| resetCommunity: Boolean! | ||
| revokeRefreshTokenForUser: Boolean! | ||
| saveFcmToken(token: String): Boolean! | ||
| sendMembershipRequest(organizationId: ID!): MembershipRequest! | ||
| sendMessageToDirectChat(chatId: ID!, messageContent: String!): DirectChatMessage! | ||
| sendMessageToGroupChat(chatId: ID!, messageContent: String!): GroupChatMessage! | ||
| sendMessageToChat(chatId: ID!, messageContent: String!, replyTo: ID): ChatMessage! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Include 'type' parameter in 'sendMessageToChat' mutation
Adding a type parameter to the sendMessageToChat mutation allows specifying the message type, aligning with the updated ChatMessage structure.
Update the mutation signature:
type Mutation {
- sendMessageToChat(chatId: ID!, messageContent: String!, replyTo: ID): ChatMessage!
+ sendMessageToChat(chatId: ID!, messageContent: String!, replyTo: ID, type: MessageType!): ChatMessage!
...
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| sendMessageToChat(chatId: ID!, messageContent: String!, replyTo: ID): ChatMessage! | |
| sendMessageToChat(chatId: ID!, messageContent: String!, replyTo: ID, type: MessageType!): ChatMessage! |
| @@ -1500,12 +1467,11 @@ | |||
| agendaItemByEvent(relatedEventId: ID!): [AgendaItem] | |||
| agendaItemByOrganization(organizationId: ID!): [AgendaItem] | |||
| agendaItemCategoriesByOrganization(organizationId: ID!): [AgendaCategory] | |||
| chatById(id: ID!): Chat! | |||
| chatsByUserId(id: ID!): [Chat] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Implement pagination in 'chatsByUserId' query to enhance performance
Fetching all chats for a user at once can lead to performance bottlenecks, especially for users with many chats. Implementing pagination improves scalability and user experience.
Modify the chatsByUserId query:
type Query {
- chatsByUserId(id: ID!): [Chat]
+ chatsByUserId(id: ID!, first: Int, after: String): ChatConnection
...
}
+type ChatConnection {
+ edges: [ChatEdge]
+ pageInfo: PageInfo!
+}
+
+type ChatEdge {
+ cursor: String!
+ node: Chat
+}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| input chatInput { | ||
| image: String | ||
| isGroup: Boolean! | ||
| name: String |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure 'organizationId' is required when 'isGroup' is true in 'chatInput'
For group chats associated with an organization, making organizationId mandatory when isGroup is true ensures data consistency and proper linkage.
Consider updating the chatInput definition:
input chatInput {
image: String
isGroup: Boolean!
name: String
- organizationId: ID
+ organizationId: ID # Consider making this non-nullable when isGroup is true
userIds: [ID!]!
}Implement validation logic to enforce this constraint during mutation processing.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Issue Number:
Fixes #2465
Did you add tests for your changes?
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Summary
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
ChatandChatMessagestructure for improved chat functionality.createChatmutation to facilitate the creation of both direct and group chats.sendMessageToChatmutation for sending messages to any chat type.chatByIdandchatsByUserIdfor retrieving chat information.messageSentToChat.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Tests
Chores