Upgraded typscript from 5.5.4 to 5.6.2 #2573
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request includes updates to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessWe have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team. Testing Your CodePlease make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:
The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/setup/redisConfiguration.ts (1)
22-28: Improved error handling looks good, with a minor suggestion.The enhanced error handling in the
checkRedisConnectionfunction is a good improvement. It provides more specific error messages, which will be helpful for debugging.Consider logging the entire error object for unknown errors to provide even more context:
} catch (error) { if (error instanceof Error) { console.error(`\nConnection to Redis failed: ${error.message}\n`); } else { console.error( - `\nConnection to Redis failed: An unknown error occurred.\n`, + `\nConnection to Redis failed: An unknown error occurred.\n`, + error ); } }This will help in cases where the error is not an instance of
Errorbut still contains useful information.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/createVenue.ts (1 hunks)
- src/setup/redisConfiguration.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/setup/redisConfiguration.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-93: Verify TypeScript upgrade impactThe changes in this file appear to be focused on improving error handling rather than addressing any TypeScript upgrade requirements. To ensure the upgrade from TypeScript 5.5.4 to 5.6.2 hasn't introduced any issues or opportunities for improvement in this file:
Run the following script to check for any TypeScript-related warnings or errors:
If any issues or improvement suggestions are found, please address them accordingly.
src/resolvers/Mutation/createVenue.ts (2)
114-114: Approve simplification, but verify intended behaviorThe simplification of the validation check for the venue name is a good improvement. It makes the code more straightforward and easier to understand.
However, this change might alter the behavior slightly:
- The previous version (likely using
??) might have allowed empty strings.- The new version considers empty strings as invalid.
Please confirm if this change in behavior is intentional and aligns with the expected functionality for venue name validation. If needed, consider adding a more specific check, such as:
if (!args.data?.name?.trim()) { // Throw error }This would explicitly disallow empty or whitespace-only strings while maintaining the simplicity of the check.
Line range hint
1-163: Verify TypeScript 5.6.2 compatibilityWhile this file doesn't show any direct changes related to the TypeScript upgrade from 5.5.4 to 5.6.2, it's crucial to ensure that it remains compatible with the new version.
Please run the TypeScript compiler on this file and the entire project to confirm that no new type errors or warnings have been introduced. Pay special attention to:
- Any uses of generic types or type inference.
- Interactions with external libraries or dependencies that might have been affected by the upgrade.
- Any TypeScript-specific features used in this file.
You can use the following command to check for TypeScript errors:
If any issues are found, please address them in this PR to ensure full compatibility with TypeScript 5.6.2.
package.json (1)
144-144: LGTM: TypeScript upgrade looks good.The upgrade of TypeScript from version 5.5.4 to 5.6.2 aligns with the PR objectives. This minor version upgrade should bring new features and bug fixes without introducing breaking changes.
To ensure compatibility, please run the following verification steps:
- Verify that all project dependencies are compatible with TypeScript 5.6.2.
- Run the full test suite to catch any potential issues introduced by the upgrade.
- Perform a local build to ensure there are no compilation errors.
|
Please fix the failing tests |
Signed-off-by: Sumitsh28 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sumitsh28 <[email protected]>
|
I'm closing this PR because my npm registry configuration was different, which resulted in some unwanted changes. |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
This PR addresses the upgrade of the TypeScript package from version 5.5.4 to 5.6.2.
Issue Number: Fixes #2538
Summary
This PR upgrades the TypeScript package from 5.5.4 to 5.6.2 to address compatibility issues that arose from previous dependency updates attempted by the automated dependabot job, which caused test failures. The goal is to ensure all dependencies are aligned and functional with the latest TypeScript version.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes