test : added tests for lib/views/after_auth_screens/events/manage_agenda_items_screen.dart
#2696
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
Other🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
test/views/after_auth_screens/events/manage_agenda_items_screen_test.dart (2)
208-254: Comprehensive edit item navigation and refresh test
This new test validates the navigation toEditAgendaItemPage, returns with apop(true)call, and confirms thatfetchAgendaItemsis called again. It’s a strong approach to verifying the end-to-end edit workflow. Consider verifying the updated item data in the UI if feasible.
342-342: Duplicate delete scenario test
This second deletion test can serve to confirm repeated or different scenarios. Consider consolidating or differentiating the deletion coverage if there’s overlap.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/views/after_auth_screens/events/manage_agenda_items_screen_test.dart(10 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Checking codebase
🔇 Additional comments (9)
test/views/after_auth_screens/events/manage_agenda_items_screen_test.dart (9)
2-2: Check third-party dependency usage
The import fordelightful_toast/toast/components/toast_card.dartappears correct as it provides the ToastCard widget tested later in the file. Confirm that it aligns with your overall package usage strategy and doesn't introduce extra dependencies or conflicts.
19-19: Good addition of edit agenda page import
Including theEditAgendaItemPageimport is necessary for the new test case. This makes the test self-contained.
31-34: Added flexibility for test event ID
Allowing a customidfor the test event is a good improvement, enabling more flexible scenario testing. There are no immediate issues.
122-122: Tests for empty agenda items
CallingcreateManageAgendaScreen('1')here is consistent with the newly added parameter. This test effectively verifies an empty state. Good job.
157-157: Consistent usage of parameterized screen creation
Again, this reference tocreateManageAgendaScreen('1')ensures the event has the correct ID. No issues noted.
192-192: Agenda item reorder test
Passing'1'tocreateManageAgendaScreenremains consistent. The test logic for reordering is clear and robust.
256-312: Thorough test of toast notification on deletion
Excellent approach to verifying the toast content, icon, and styling. This test ensures both functionality and user feedback are as expected.
350-350: Create agenda item navigation
Validation of navigation toCreateAgendaItemPageis straightforward and consistent with the parameterized approach for event IDs. Looks good.
Line range hint
69-81: Refined widget creation for dynamic event IDs
Changing the function to accept anidparameter ensures tests can manage different events. Confirm that all calls tocreateManageAgendaScreennow supply the required argument.To confirm, you can run:
✅ Verification successful
All calls to
createManageAgendaScreenproperly supply the required string ID argument🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search all references to createManageAgendaScreen and verify they pass a string argument rg --context 4 'createManageAgendaScreen'Length of output: 7941
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #2696 +/- ##
====================================================
+ Coverage 96.45% 96.55% +0.10%
====================================================
Files 189 189
Lines 9994 9994
====================================================
+ Hits 9640 9650 +10
+ Misses 354 344 -10 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
palisadoes
merged commit b5b49cb
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
lib/views/after_auth_screens/events/manage_agenda_items_screen.dartIssue Number:
lib/views/after_auth_screens/events/manage_agenda_items_screen.dart#2610Did you add tests for your changes?
Snapshots/Videos:
Summary
lib/views/after_auth_screens/events/manage_agenda_items_screen.dartDoes this PR introduce a breaking change?
Have you read the contributing guide?
Summary by CodeRabbit