New CI with Github Actions.

[thebigG]

New CI with Github Actions

Hi everyone,
hope you are all doing well.

Description

As we discussed on this issue #126, TravisCI is no longer an option as it has a time limit not just on individual builds, but every account only gets an X amount of minutes it can use for its lifetime. After that, you'll have to pay. This is why I have setup GitHub actions for our CI needs. The only issue I ran across with Github Actions was the fact that if the max_listing_days was set to something as high as 35, JobFunel will error out for some reason. This is an issue that needs further investigation; I don't know the exact reason why this happens. I'll document this odd issue at some point in the future.

In the meantime, Github Actions seems to work without a time limit. I have updated the trigger branches (push and pull_request keys on github actions configuration), so it should get triggered when this PR gets merged. Fingers crossed 😎 . The .travis.yml file has been deleted. Check commit history for details.

After this gets merged, and if all goes well, I'll submit a PR to update the readme's CI badge to report Github Actions status instead of TravisCI.

Context of change

Please add options that are relevant and mark any boxes that apply.

• Software (software that runs on the PC)
• Library (library that runs on the PC)
• Tool (tool that assists coding development)
• Other

Type of change

Please mark any boxes that apply.

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes.
Provide instructions so we can reproduce.
Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration.

• Tested Github Actions on my fork.

Checklist:

Please mark any boxes that have been completed.

• I have performed a self-review of my own code.
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation.
• My changes generate no new warnings.
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes.
• Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules.

[thebigG]

It got triggered. We are in business 👍.

[PaulMcInnis]

awesome!

[thebigG]

@PaulMcInnis Will merge 👍 . If it fails, I have a feeling Indeed might be showing a popup message when we send the request and so we are not getting the HTML because there is some javascript executing before we get the HTML page. Something similar has happened to me when I try to scrape Indeed without being signed in, which would make sense given that Github server does not "log in". In any case, if it fails, I'll post an issue and will investigate further. At the very least now we don't have the time limit we had on TravisCI anymore.