Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Proposal] Remove old benchmarks from Readme #56

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

albi3ro
Copy link
Contributor

@albi3ro albi3ro commented Aug 22, 2023

This PR proposes to remove the benchmarks from the readme until such time as we have updated benchmarks.

The table is four years old, and the graph is over a year old. We also have no idea what the simulations were run on, other than it is potentially something with 48 available cores.

The benchmarks also provide no information about what was measured. Single expectation value?

If we are to advertise benchmarks for the plugin, they should be maintained routinely, and fully specified.

@albi3ro albi3ro requested review from mlxd and trbromley August 22, 2023 21:24
@mlxd
Copy link
Member

mlxd commented Aug 22, 2023

No blocker from me. I'll leave @trbromley and another to approve.

@trbromley
Copy link

Do we have reason to believe that the benchmark timings are significantly different now versus then?

@trbromley trbromley removed their request for review September 7, 2023 20:19
@albi3ro albi3ro closed this Sep 27, 2023
@albi3ro albi3ro deleted the remove-benchmarks-from-readme branch September 27, 2023 13:42
@mlxd
Copy link
Member

mlxd commented Sep 27, 2023

Do we have reason to believe that the benchmark timings are significantly different now versus then?

Yes, they are very different.

@trbromley
Copy link

Do we have reason to believe that the benchmark timings are significantly different now versus then?

Yes, they are very different.

Are we able to update instead of remove?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants