Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Initial Merge Pull Request #2

Open
wants to merge 33 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

MishaSavchenko
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link

@drewjrosen drewjrosen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Basically you need to comment more on everything.

# So logflux (which is what we want) is just the log of this
logflux[i] = logfactor + np.log10(flux[i])
return logflux

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You should comment on everything below. Explain more what is going on.

@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
from __future__ import print_function

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add comments to everything.

…ons with an arbitrary and a calculated burn point
…esult int results.dat, Spectral_radiance uses results.dat to plot last estimate, spectral_radiance.py does the same with some issues
@MishaSavchenko MishaSavchenko self-assigned this Apr 13, 2017
@MishaSavchenko MishaSavchenko changed the title General Pull Request Initial Merge Pull Request Apr 13, 2017
Copy link
Member

@kelle kelle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I made several comments in line.
also, files in pycache should not be here. Several other students have had all these extra files in their repos as well. Consider asking David for help.

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
{}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this file should not be tracked by github. (Nothing in the .cache directory should be.)

@@ -0,0 +1,474 @@
{
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pretty sure this file shouldn't be tracked either.

flux=np.empty([len(wavelength)])
logflux=np.empty([len(wavelength)])
for i in range(len(wavelength)):
# Flux is just the Planck function
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

delete "just".

for i in range(len(wavelength)):
# Flux is just the Planck function
flux[i] = ( (2.0*con.h*con.c**2)/(wavelength[i]**5) )/( np.exp( (con.h*con.c)/(con.k*Teff*wavelength[i]) ) - 1.0 )
# So logflux (which is what we want) is just the log of this
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

delete "just". logflux is the log of the Planck function.


results = ascii.read("results.dat")

T1 = 100
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

T is ambigiusous. temp?

T3 = 300
MCMC_Temp = results[0][0]

Y1_B = (np.log10(planck(X*10**-6,T1)))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I dont know what the code is doing here. what does Y1_B mean?

Y4_B = (np.log10(planck(X*10**-6,T3)))


x = np.asarray([3.368,4.618,12.082,22.194,3.6,4.5])
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

where do these numbers come from?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants