New Components - fakturoid #13961
New Components - fakturoid #13961
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
3 Skipped Deployments
|
luancazarine
added
the
ai-assisted
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce several new modules and enhancements to the Fakturoid components, focusing on invoice management, payment processing, and event emissions. Key functionalities include creating, canceling, and managing invoices and payments, along with new event sources for invoice updates and new contacts. Additionally, the constants and utility functions have been expanded to support these features, and the application has been enhanced with new properties and methods for improved interaction with the Fakturoid API. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Sources - Invoice Status Change (Instant) - New Contact - New Invoice Actions - Create Invoice - Cancel Uncancel Invoice - Pay Remove Payment Invoice
Sources - Invoice Updated - New Contact - New Invoice Actions - Create Invoice - Cancel Uncancel Invoice - Pay Remove Payment Invoice
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 17
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (24)
components/fakturoid/common/utils.mjs (1)
1-24: Overall structure and logic look good, with some suggestions for improvement.The
parseObjectfunction is well-structured and handles common cases appropriately. However, there are a few improvements that could enhance its robustness and maintainability:
- Consider adding type checking for the
objparameter to handle unexpected input types more gracefully.- Implement handling for circular references to prevent potential stack overflow errors.
- Add JSDoc comments to improve documentation and provide better type hints for users of this function.
Here's a suggested implementation incorporating these improvements:
/** * Parses an object, array, or string, attempting to convert JSON strings to objects. * @param {*} obj - The input to parse. Can be an object, array, or string. * @returns {*} The parsed result. * @throws {TypeError} If the input is not of a supported type. */ export const parseObject = (obj) => { if (obj === null || obj === undefined) return undefined; if (typeof obj !== 'object' && typeof obj !== 'string') { throw new TypeError('Input must be an object, array, or string'); } const seen = new WeakSet(); const parseItem = (item) => { if (typeof item === 'object' && item !== null) { if (seen.has(item)) { return '[Circular]'; } seen.add(item); } if (Array.isArray(item)) { return item.map(parseItem); } if (typeof item === 'string') { try { return JSON.parse(item); } catch (e) { return item; } } return item; }; return parseItem(obj); };This implementation:
- Adds type checking and throws a
TypeErrorfor unsupported input types.- Handles circular references using a
WeakSet.- Includes JSDoc comments for better documentation.
- Maintains the original functionality while improving error handling and edge case management.
components/fakturoid/sources/new-invoice/new-invoice.mjs (2)
4-11: LGTM: Metadata is well-defined, but consider enhancing the description.The component's metadata is appropriately structured for a Pipedream source. However, the description could be more informative.
Consider expanding the description to include more details about when events are emitted and any specific behaviors or limitations. For example:
- description: "Emit new event when a new invoice is created in Fakturoid.", + description: "Emits a new event when a new invoice is created in Fakturoid. This source polls the Fakturoid API at regular intervals to detect new invoices.",
12-20: LGTM: Methods are well-structured, but consider adding error handling.The methods are appropriately defined and extend the common methods. However, the
getSummarymethod could benefit from improved error handling.Consider adding a null check in the
getSummarymethod to handle cases where the invoice object might be null or undefined:getSummary(invoice) { + if (!invoice || !invoice.number) { + return "New invoice created: Details not available"; + } return `New invoice created: ${invoice.number}`; },components/fakturoid/sources/invoice-updated/invoice-updated.mjs (1)
17-19: Consider enhancing the summary with additional invoice details.While the current summary is concise, it might be more informative to include additional details such as the invoice amount or the customer name. This could provide users with more context at a glance.
Consider modifying the getSummary method to include more information:
getSummary(invoice) { return `Invoice ${invoice.number} updated for ${invoice.client_name}: ${invoice.total_amount} ${invoice.currency}`; }components/fakturoid/sources/new-contact/test-event.mjs (1)
43-47: Consider adding documentation for custom email text fields.The contact object includes several custom email text fields, which is great for allowing personalized communication. However, it might be helpful to provide some guidance or examples for these fields.
Consider adding comments to explain the purpose and expected format of each custom email text field. For example:
// Custom text to be included in regular invoice emails "custom_email_text": null, // Custom text for overdue invoice reminders "overdue_email_text": null, // Custom text for emails sent when creating an invoice from a proforma "invoice_from_proforma_email_text": null, // Custom text for thank you emails after receiving payment "thank_you_email_text": null, // Custom text for estimate-related emails "custom_estimate_email_text": null,components/fakturoid/common/constants.mjs (3)
1-24: LGTM with a suggestion for improvementThe
parseObjectfunction is well-implemented and handles various input types correctly. It gracefully manages JSON parsing for both arrays and individual strings.Suggestion: Consider adding explicit handling for non-string primitives in arrays to improve clarity and potentially catch edge cases.
You could modify the array handling like this:
if (Array.isArray(obj)) { return obj.map((item) => { if (typeof item === "string") { try { return JSON.parse(item); } catch (e) { return item; } } return typeof item === 'object' ? parseObject(item) : item; }); }This change ensures that nested objects within arrays are also parsed recursively.
72-81: LGTM with a suggestion for future expansionThe
ACTION_OPTIONSconstant clearly defines the cancel and uncancel actions for Fakturoid. The structure is consistent with other constants in the file.Suggestion: As the Fakturoid integration evolves, consider expanding this constant to include other relevant actions if they become available in the API.
94-151: LGTM with a minor suggestion for consistencyThe
EVENT_OPTIONSconstant provides a comprehensive and well-structured list of event types for invoice-related operations in Fakturoid. The options cover the entire lifecycle of an invoice, including updates, payments, and various status changes.Suggestion: For consistency, consider using past tense for all event labels. For example, change "Invoice was updated" to "Invoice updated" and "Email with the invoice was sent to the subject" to "Email with invoice sent to subject".
components/fakturoid/sources/invoice-updated/test-event.mjs (4)
1-41: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc comments for better documentation.The general information section of the invoice object is well-structured and comprehensive. It includes all necessary fields for identifying and categorizing the invoice.
Consider adding JSDoc comments at the beginning of the file to describe the purpose of this test event object and its structure. This would enhance documentation and make it easier for other developers to understand and use this test data.
Example:
/** * @fileoverview Test event object representing a Fakturoid invoice. * This object contains sample data for testing invoice-related functionality. * @typedef {Object} FakturoidInvoice */
42-77: Financial details are comprehensive. Consider adding currency validation.The financial details section is well-structured and includes all necessary information for invoice processing and tracking. The use of ISO date formats for timestamps is appropriate, and the inclusion of both native and non-native currency totals is thorough.
Consider adding currency code validation to ensure that only valid currency codes are used. This could be implemented using a separate utility function or by integrating with a currency validation library.
Example implementation:
const validCurrencies = ['USD', 'EUR', 'CZK', /* ... */]; function validateCurrency(currencyCode) { if (!validCurrencies.includes(currencyCode)) { throw new Error(`Invalid currency code: ${currencyCode}`); } } // Usage in the invoice object currency: validateCurrency("CZK") || "CZK",
78-115: Line items structure is flexible and detailed. Consider normalizing inventory field.The line items array is well-structured, providing comprehensive information for each item, including pricing details both with and without VAT. The flexibility to include inventory information for some items is a good feature.
For consistency, consider normalizing the
inventoryfield across all line items. Instead of usingnullfor items without inventory information, you could use an empty object or a default structure. This would make processing the data more consistent.Example:
const defaultInventory = { item_id: null, sku: null, article_number_type: null, article_number: null, move_id: null }; // In each line item: inventory: item.inventory || defaultInventory,This approach would ensure that all line items have a consistent structure for the
inventoryfield, making it easier to process and less prone to null-checking errors.
136-146: Metadata and URL section is well-structured. Consider adding a version field.The metadata and URL section provides valuable information for accessing and tracking the invoice. The inclusion of various URLs for different representations of the invoice is particularly useful for integration purposes.
Consider adding a
versionorschema_versionfield to the invoice object. This would be helpful for maintaining backwards compatibility as the invoice structure evolves over time.Example:
{ // ... existing fields ... schema_version: "1.0", created_at: "2023-11-30T13:50:45.848+01:00", updated_at: "2023-12-01T09:05:47.187+01:00" }This addition would make it easier to handle potential future changes to the invoice structure in your application logic.
components/fakturoid/sources/new-invoice/test-event.mjs (4)
1-41: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The invoice metadata section is well-structured and comprehensive. It includes all necessary fields for identifying and tracking the invoice, as well as client information.
Consider adding a brief comment at the beginning of the file to explain its purpose as a test event for the new-invoice source. This would enhance readability and maintainability.
52-55: LGTM! Consider adding example tags for completeness.The notes and tags section is well-structured, allowing for different types of notes (public, footer, and private). The empty tags array is appropriate if no tags are assigned.
For the purpose of a comprehensive test event, consider adding example tags to demonstrate how they would appear in the structure. This could be beneficial for testing tag-related functionality.
78-146: LGTM! Detailed line items, VAT summary, and useful URLs.The structure for line items, VAT summary, and URLs is comprehensive and well-organized. It provides all necessary details for individual items, a clear breakdown of taxes, and various access points for the invoice.
Consider adding a comment above the
linesarray to indicate that it's an example with two items. This could help developers understand that the array can contain multiple items in real scenarios.
1-146: Overall, excellent test event structure for the new-invoice source.This test event provides a comprehensive representation of a new invoice, aligning well with the objectives outlined for the "new-invoice" polling source in the PR. The structure includes all necessary details for invoice metadata, client information, line items, VAT calculations, and relevant URLs.
The thoroughness of this test event will facilitate robust testing of the new-invoice source functionality, ensuring that all aspects of a new invoice can be properly emitted and processed by the system.
As you continue to develop and test the Fakturoid integration, consider creating similar test events for other sources and actions mentioned in the PR objectives (e.g., invoice-status-change-instant, new-contact). This will ensure consistent and comprehensive testing across all new components.
components/fakturoid/sources/common/base.mjs (2)
52-52: Optimize array sorting and reversalCurrently, the
responseArrayis sorted in descending order by date and then reversed before emitting events. This reversal can be avoided by sorting the array in ascending order initially.Consider adjusting the sort function to sort in ascending order:
responseArray = responseArray - .sort((a, b) => Date.parse(b[dateField]) - Date.parse(a[dateField])); + .sort((a, b) => Date.parse(a[dateField]) - Date.parse(b[dateField]));Then, you can remove the
.reverse()call at line 60.Also applies to: 60-60
23-23: Use a more appropriate default last dateUsing
"1970-01-01T00:00:00"as the default last date may not be suitable if the API doesn't support querying data from that far back.Consider setting the default last date to a more recent date, such as the current date minus one interval:
return this.db.get("lastDate") || new Date(Date.now() - this.timer.intervalSeconds * 1000).toISOString();components/fakturoid/actions/pay-remove-payment-invoice/pay-remove-payment-invoice.mjs (2)
1-109: Consider adding error handling and input validation.While the overall structure and functionality of the module are well-implemented, it would be beneficial to add error handling and input validation to ensure robustness and provide informative error messages to users. Consider the following suggestions:
- Validate the required properties (
accountSlug,invoiceId,actionType) to ensure they are provided and have the expected format.- Add error handling for API calls (
getInvoice,payInvoice,removePayment) to catch and handle potential errors gracefully.- Validate user inputs, such as ensuring the
amountis a valid number and thepaidOndate follows the expected format.By incorporating error handling and input validation, you can improve the reliability and user experience of the action.
1-109: Consider adding unit tests.To ensure the correctness and maintainability of the module, it would be beneficial to add unit tests that cover the different scenarios and edge cases. Consider the following suggestions:
- Test the
additionalPropsmethod to verify that it generates the correct properties based on the selectedactionType.- Test the
runmethod to ensure it calls the appropriate Fakturoid API methods (payInvoice,removePayment) with the correct parameters and handles the responses correctly.- Test error scenarios, such as invalid inputs or API errors, to verify that the module handles them gracefully and provides informative error messages.
By adding unit tests, you can catch potential issues early, ensure the module behaves as expected, and facilitate future maintenance and updates.
components/fakturoid/actions/create-invoice/create-invoice.mjs (4)
20-20: Standardize capitalization in labels: Change "Custom Id" to "Custom ID".For consistency, consider capitalizing "ID" in the label.
Apply this diff:
- label: "Custom Id", + label: "Custom ID",
84-94: Use the "number" type for numerical values like "Subtotal" and "Total".Since "Subtotal" and "Total" represent numerical values, consider changing their type from
"string"to"number"for better input validation.Apply this diff:
- subtotal: { - type: "string", + subtotal: { + type: "number", label: "Subtotal", description: "Total without VAT", optional: true, }, - total: { - type: "string", + total: { + type: "number", label: "Total", description: "Total with VAT", optional: true, },Also, you can remove the
parseFloatcalls in therunmethod:- subtotal: this.subtotal && parseFloat(this.subtotal), - total: this.total && parseFloat(this.total), + subtotal: this.subtotal, + total: this.total,
54-58: Consider changing the type of "Due" from "string" to "integer".Since "Due" represents the number of days from today, it would be more appropriate to use the
integertype.Apply this diff:
- due: { - type: "string", + due: { + type: "integer", label: "Due", description: "Invoice due date in number of days from today", optional: true, },
97-98: Improve the formatting of the example in the "Lines" property description.To enhance readability, consider formatting the JSON example using code blocks.
Apply this diff to update the description:
- description: "List of object lines to invoice. [See the documentation](https://www.fakturoid.cz/api/v3/invoices#attributes). Example: {\"name\": \"Hard work\",\"quantity\": \"1.0\",\"unit_name\": \"h\",\"unit_price\": \"40000\",\"vat_rate\": \"21\"}", + description: "List of object lines to invoice. [See the documentation](https://www.fakturoid.cz/api/v3/invoices#attributes).\n\nExample:\n```json\n{\n \"name\": \"Hard work\",\n \"quantity\": \"1.0\",\n \"unit_name\": \"h\",\n \"unit_price\": \"40000\",\n \"vat_rate\": \"21\"\n}\n```",
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
- components/fakturoid/actions/cancel-uncancel-invoice/cancel-uncancel-invoice.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/fakturoid/actions/create-invoice/create-invoice.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/fakturoid/actions/pay-remove-payment-invoice/pay-remove-payment-invoice.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/fakturoid/common/constants.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/fakturoid/common/utils.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/fakturoid/fakturoid.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/fakturoid/package.json (2 hunks)
- components/fakturoid/sources/common/base.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/fakturoid/sources/invoice-updated/invoice-updated.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/fakturoid/sources/invoice-updated/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/fakturoid/sources/new-contact/new-contact.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/fakturoid/sources/new-contact/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/fakturoid/sources/new-invoice/new-invoice.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/fakturoid/sources/new-invoice/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (40)
components/fakturoid/package.json (3)
3-3: Version update looks good.The version bump from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 is appropriate for the new features being added in this PR. This minor version increase correctly indicates that new functionality has been added without breaking changes.
14-14: PublishConfig change is correct.Setting the "access" to "public" in publishConfig is appropriate for this Pipedream component. This ensures that the package will be publicly accessible when published to npm, allowing Pipedream users to utilize the Fakturoid components.
15-17: Dependencies addition is appropriate.The addition of "@pipedream/platform" as a dependency is correct for a Pipedream component. The version constraint "^3.0.3" allows for compatible updates, which is a good practice.
Please verify that 3.0.3 is the latest version of @pipedream/platform. You can check this by running the following command:
If a newer version is available, consider updating to the latest version for potential improvements and bug fixes.
components/fakturoid/sources/new-contact/new-contact.mjs (5)
1-2: LGTM: Appropriate imports for the component.The import statements are well-structured and import necessary modules for the component's functionality. The use of a common base module promotes code reuse across Fakturoid components.
4-11: LGTM: Well-structured component definition.The exported object is well-structured and includes all necessary properties for a Fakturoid source component. The use of the spread operator for common properties promotes code reuse and consistency. The specific properties are appropriate for a new contact source, including the "unique" deduplication strategy.
12-20: LGTM: Well-implemented methods for the component.The methods object is well-structured, reusing common methods and implementing specific ones for this component. The
getFunctionmethod appropriately returns thelistSubjectsfunction from the Fakturoid API. ThegetSummarymethod provides a clear, concise summary of a new contact event.
1-22: LGTM: Well-implemented new contact source component.This implementation of the "New Contact Added" source component for Fakturoid aligns well with the PR objectives. It correctly implements a polling source for new contacts, as specified in the requirements. The code is well-structured, promotes reusability through the use of a common base, and includes necessary methods for interacting with the Fakturoid API.
Some key points:
- The component correctly uses the
listSubjectsfunction to fetch new contacts.- It implements a
getSummarymethod for clear event descriptions.- The "unique" deduplication strategy ensures that each new contact is reported only once.
Overall, this component appears to fulfill its intended purpose effectively and efficiently.
21-21: LGTM: Sample emit included for testing.The inclusion of a
sampleEmitproperty is good practice for providing example data or facilitating testing.To ensure comprehensive test coverage, please verify that the
test-event.mjsfile contains appropriate test data. You can use the following script to check its contents:✅ Verification successful
Verified: Sample emit contains appropriate test data.
The
test-event.mjsfile includes comprehensive sample data, ensuring proper test coverage.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the contents of the test-event.mjs file # Test: Check if the test-event.mjs file exists and display its contents cat components/fakturoid/sources/new-contact/test-event.mjsLength of output: 1588
components/fakturoid/sources/new-invoice/new-invoice.mjs (3)
1-2: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and follow good practices.The import statements are well-structured, importing necessary modules for the component's functionality and testing.
21-21: LGTM: Sample emit is properly included.The inclusion of a sample emit is a good practice for testing and documentation purposes.
1-22: Overall, the new-invoice source component is well-implemented.This new component aligns with the PR objectives by implementing the "new-invoice" polling source for Fakturoid. It follows good practices in terms of code structure, reuse, and component development patterns for Pipedream. The suggested minor improvements in the description and error handling will further enhance its robustness and usability.
To ensure the component is properly integrated, please run the following verification script:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful
The
new-invoicesource component has been successfully verified. All required exports and methods are correctly implemented.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new-invoice component integration # Test 1: Check if the component is properly exported ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'export default { $$$' components/fakturoid/sources/new-invoice/new-invoice.mjs # Test 2: Verify the presence of required methods ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'methods: { $$$ getFunction() { $$$ }, getSummary(invoice) { $$$ }, $$$ }' components/fakturoid/sources/new-invoice/new-invoice.mjs # Test 3: Check for the presence of the common base import grep -n "import common from \"../common/base.mjs\"" components/fakturoid/sources/new-invoice/new-invoice.mjs # Test 4: Verify the component key grep -n "key: \"fakturoid-new-invoice\"" components/fakturoid/sources/new-invoice/new-invoice.mjsLength of output: 1429
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Refined verification of the new-invoice component # Test 1: Check if the component is exported using a simpler pattern ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'export default { $$$ }' components/fakturoid/sources/new-invoice/new-invoice.mjs # Test 2: Verify the presence of getFunction method rg -A2 'getFunction\s*\(' components/fakturoid/sources/new-invoice/new-invoice.mjs # Test 3: Verify the presence of getSummary method rg -A2 'getSummary\s*\(' components/fakturoid/sources/new-invoice/new-invoice.mjsLength of output: 2023
components/fakturoid/sources/invoice-updated/invoice-updated.mjs (7)
1-2: LGTM: Appropriate imports for the module's purpose.The import statements are well-structured, importing common functionality and test events as needed for this source component.
4-11: LGTM: Well-defined source component properties.The object properties are correctly defined for a Pipedream source component. The key, name, description, version, type, and dedupe properties are all appropriate and accurately describe the component's purpose and behavior.
14-16: LGTM: Correct implementation of getFunction method.The getFunction method correctly returns the listInvoices function from the Fakturoid API client. This is appropriate for a source component that needs to fetch updated invoices.
20-24: LGTM: Correct implementation of getParams method.The getParams method correctly constructs the parameters object with the updated_since filter. This is crucial for fetching only the invoices that have been updated since the last check, ensuring efficient API usage.
25-27: LGTM: Correct implementation of getDateField method.The getDateField method correctly returns "updated_at" as the field to be used for date-based filtering. This is appropriate for tracking invoice updates and ensures that the component will correctly identify newly updated invoices.
29-29: LGTM: Correct implementation of sampleEmit property.The sampleEmit property is correctly set to the imported sampleEmit function. This is crucial for generating sample events, which aids in testing and provides example payloads for users of this component.
1-30: Overall, well-implemented source component for tracking updated Fakturoid invoices.This implementation correctly extends the common base functionality and adds the necessary methods for tracking updated invoices. It adheres to Pipedream's best practices and fulfills the requirements specified in the PR objectives.
A few points to note:
- The component correctly uses the listInvoices function to fetch updated invoices.
- Proper deduplication is implemented to avoid duplicate events.
- The getParams method correctly constructs the filter for updated invoices.
The only suggested improvement is to enhance the getSummary method with more invoice details, as mentioned in a previous comment.
To ensure this component integrates well with the rest of the Fakturoid implementation, let's verify the common base import:
✅ Verification successful
Enhance the
getSummarymethod with additional invoice details for better context.Currently, the
getSummarymethod returns the invoice number. Consider including more information, such as the invoice date or total amount, to provide a clearer summary.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the contents of the common base file cat components/fakturoid/sources/common/base.mjsLength of output: 1940
components/fakturoid/sources/new-contact/test-event.mjs (2)
1-15: LGTM: Basic structure and essential properties are well-defined.The contact object's structure is appropriate, containing essential properties such as
id,type,name,
49-52: LGTM: URL and timestamp properties are well-defined.The inclusion of both
html_urlandurlproperties provides convenient access to the web interface and API respectively. Thecreated_atandupdated_attimestamps use the ISO 8601 format, which is a good standard practice for representing dates and times.components/fakturoid/common/constants.mjs (4)
26-51: LGTM: Well-defined document type optionsThe
DOCUMENT_TYPE_OPTIONSconstant provides a comprehensive and clearly labeled list of document types for Fakturoid. The inclusion of usage notes (e.g., for the legacy partial proforma) adds valuable context for developers.
53-70: LGTM: Clear and concise proforma optionsThe
PROFORMA_OPTIONSconstant effectively defines the various statuses for proforma invoices in Fakturoid. The options are well-labeled and cover different scenarios, providing a clear structure for developers to work with.
83-92: LGTM: Well-defined payment action typesThe
ACTION_TYPE_OPTIONSconstant effectively defines the types of actions that can be performed on payments in Fakturoid. The options for executing and removing payments are clearly labeled and provide a straightforward structure for developers to work with.
153-159: LGTM: Clean and comprehensive exportThe default export provides a well-structured object containing all the constants defined in the file. This approach allows for easy and organized access to these constants when imported in other parts of the application.
components/fakturoid/sources/invoice-updated/test-event.mjs (3)
18-33: Client information structure looks good!The client information section is well-organized and includes all necessary fields. The use of a boolean flag
client_has_delivery_addresscoupled with null values for unused delivery address fields provides a clear and flexible structure for handling different client scenarios.
116-135: VAT summary structure is clear and comprehensive.The VAT summary section provides a detailed breakdown of VAT rates and amounts, including information in both native and non-native currencies. This structure allows for easy calculation and verification of VAT amounts across different rates.
The consistency in providing both native and non-native currency information aligns well with the rest of the invoice structure, facilitating accurate financial reporting and currency conversion if needed.
1-146: Overall, excellent structure for the Fakturoid invoice test event.This test event object provides a comprehensive representation of a Fakturoid invoice, including all necessary details for processing and integration. The structure is well-organized, consistent, and follows good practices for data representation.
Key strengths:
- Comprehensive coverage of invoice details
- Consistent use of data types and null values
- Inclusion of both native and non-native currency information
- Flexible structure for line items and VAT rates
Suggested improvements:
- Add JSDoc comments for better documentation
- Consider adding currency validation
- Normalize the inventory field in line items
- Add a schema version field for future compatibility
These minor enhancements would further improve the already solid structure of this test event object.
components/fakturoid/sources/new-invoice/test-event.mjs (2)
42-51: LGTM! Date and status fields are well-structured.The date and status section provides a comprehensive timeline for the invoice, including issue date, due date, and various status-related timestamps. The use of consistent date formats (YYYY-MM-DD for dates, ISO 8601 for timestamps) is commendable.
56-77: LGTM! Comprehensive payment and totals information.The payment and totals section is well-structured, providing detailed information about bank accounts, payment methods, and currency. The inclusion of both invoice and native currency amounts, as well as the remaining amount, is particularly useful for various financial scenarios and partial payment tracking.
components/fakturoid/actions/cancel-uncancel-invoice/cancel-uncancel-invoice.mjs (1)
1-33: Module and props are well-definedThe imports, module metadata, and props are correctly defined and adhere to best practices.
components/fakturoid/sources/common/base.mjs (2)
54-55: Optimize data fetching by limiting results at the API levelTruncating the
responseArrayafter fetching all data can be inefficient and may cause unnecessary load on the API.[performance]
Modify the API request parameters to limit the number of results retrieved:
getParams(lastDate) { return { since: lastDate, + per_page: maxResults || 100, // Adjust per_page based on maxResults or a reasonable default }; },Also, adjust the call to
paginateto respect themaxResults:const response = this.fakturoid.paginate({ fn: this.getFunction(), accountSlug: this.accountSlug, params: this.getParams(lastDate), + maxResults, });
70-72: Ensure deploy hook doesn't exceed rate limitsEmitting 25 events during the deploy could potentially hit API rate limits or overwhelm downstream systems.
Confirm that emitting 25 events at once is acceptable. If there are rate limits or processing constraints, consider reducing the number or implementing a throttling mechanism.
components/fakturoid/actions/pay-remove-payment-invoice/pay-remove-payment-invoice.mjs (4)
1-2: LGTM!The imports are correctly defined and follow the expected naming conventions.
4-34: LGTM!The exported object has the necessary properties defined, including metadata (
key,name,description,version,type) and the required props for the action (fakturoid,accountSlug,invoiceId,actionType). The prop definitions are correctly structured.
35-83: LGTM!The
additionalPropsmethod correctly generates the additional properties based on the selectedactionType. For the "execute" action type, it adds the necessary properties for payment execution (paidOn,currency,amount,markDocumentAsPaid). For the "remove" action type, it retrieves the list of existing payments using the Fakturoid API and generates thepaymentIdproperty options.
84-108: LGTM!The
runmethod correctly implements the core functionality of the action based on the selectedactionType. For the "execute" action type, it calls thepayInvoicemethod with the necessary parameters and exports a success summary message. For the "remove" action type, it calls theremovePaymentmethod and exports a success summary message. The method structure and logic are well-defined.components/fakturoid/fakturoid.app.mjs (2)
74-77: Ensure sensitive data is handled securely in_headers()methodWhile constructing the headers, make sure that the access token is not inadvertently exposed in logs or error messages.
[security]
Review your logging and error handling to ensure that
this.$auth.oauth_access_tokenis not logged or exposed in any way.
146-164: Verify pagination implementation inpaginate()methodThe
paginate()method increments thepageparameter and continues fetching data until no more results are returned. Ensure that this aligns with the Fakturoid API's pagination mechanism and that there are no off-by-one errors.Run the following script to verify the pagination logic:
Please replace
YOUR_ACCESS_TOKENandYOUR_ACCOUNT_SLUGwith actual values to perform the verification.components/fakturoid/actions/create-invoice/create-invoice.mjs (2)
71-76: Review the necessity of parsing the "Tags" property.The
tagsproperty is defined as astring[], which implies it's an array of strings. If this is correct, theparseObjectfunction may not be necessary.Please confirm if
parseObjectis needed here. If not, you can simplify the code:- tags: parseObject(this.tags), + tags: this.tags,
118-133:⚠️ Potential issueEnsure undefined properties are handled appropriately in the API request.
Some properties, such as
proforma_followup_document, may beundefinedif not applicable. Verify whether the Fakturoid API acceptsundefinedornullvalues for optional fields. If not, consider omitting properties that areundefinedfrom thedataobject to prevent potential issues.You can conditionally include properties in the
dataobject:const data = { custom_id: this.customId, document_type: this.documentType, subject_id: this.subjectId, order_number: this.orderNumber, note: this.note, due: this.due, issued_on: this.issuedOn, taxable_fulfillment_due: this.taxableFulfillmentDue, tags: this.tags, round_total: this.roundTotal, subtotal: this.subtotal, total: this.total, lines: this.lines, }; + if (this.proformaFollowupDocument) { + data.proforma_followup_document = this.proformaFollowupDocument; + } const response = await this.fakturoid.createInvoice({ $, accountSlug: this.accountSlug, data, });Please ensure that only defined properties are sent in the API request.
components/fakturoid/actions/cancel-uncancel-invoice/cancel-uncancel-invoice.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
/approve |
Resolves #13809.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Enhancements
Utilities