Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade react-transition-group from 2.9.0 to 4.4.5 #9

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

snyk-io[bot]
Copy link

@snyk-io snyk-io bot commented Aug 13, 2024

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade react-transition-group from 2.9.0 to 4.4.5.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


⚠️ Warning: This PR contains major version upgrade(s), and may be a breaking change.

  • The recommended version is 15 versions ahead of your current version.

  • The recommended version was released on 2 years ago.

Release notes
Package name: react-transition-group
  • 4.4.5 - 2022-08-01

    4.4.5 (2022-08-01)

    Bug Fixes

    • apply entering animation synchronously when unmountOnExit or mountOnEnter is enabled (#847) (1043549)
  • 4.4.4 - 2022-07-30

    4.4.4 (2022-07-30)

    Bug Fixes

  • 4.4.3 - 2022-07-30

    4.4.3 (2022-07-30)

    Bug Fixes

    • enter animations with mountOnEnter or unmountOnExit (#749) (51bdceb)
  • 4.4.2 - 2021-05-29

    4.4.2 (2021-05-29)

    Bug Fixes

    • nodeRef prop type for cross-realm elements (#732) (8710c01)
  • 4.4.1 - 2020-05-06

    4.4.1 (2020-05-06)

    Bug Fixes

  • 4.4.0 - 2020-05-05

    4.4.0 (2020-05-05)

    Features

    • add nodeRef alternative instead of internal findDOMNode (#559) (85016bf)
      • react-transition-group internally uses findDOMNode, which is deprecated and produces warnings in Strict Mode, so now you can optionally pass nodeRef to Transition and CSSTransition, it's a ref object that should point to the transitioning child:

        import React from "react"
        import { CSSTransition } from "react-transition-group"

        const MyComponent = () => {
        const nodeRef = React.useRef(null)
        return (
        <CSSTransition nodeRef={nodeRef} in timeout={200} classNames="fade">
        <div ref={nodeRef}>Fade</div>
        </CSSTransition>
        )
        }

    Bug Fixes

    • set the values of constants attached to Transition to match the exported ones (#554)
  • 4.3.0 - 2019-09-05

    4.3.0 (2019-09-05)

    Features

  • 4.2.2 - 2019-08-02

    4.2.2 (2019-08-02)

    Bug Fixes

    • Fix imports to play nicely with rollup (#530) (3d9003e)
  • 4.2.1 - 2019-07-02

    4.2.1 (2019-07-02)

    Bug Fixes

    • updated SwitchTransition component to be default export and exported from index.js (#516) (cfd0070)
  • 4.2.0 - 2019-06-28

    4.2.0 (2019-06-28)

    Features

  • 4.1.1 - 2019-06-10
  • 4.1.0 - 2019-05-30
  • 4.0.1 - 2019-05-09
  • 4.0.0 - 2019-04-16
  • 3.0.0 - 2019-04-15
  • 2.9.0 - 2019-04-06
from react-transition-group GitHub release notes

Important

  • Warning: This PR contains a major version upgrade, and may be a breaking change.
  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade react-transition-group from 2.9.0 to 4.4.5.

See this package in npm:
react-transition-group

See this project in Snyk:
https://app.snyk.io/org/playgirlkaybraz11-KTz7vPn4RY3tSmDzVJLKFu/project/ef40f68e-3dc1-4e02-98d6-7fb3f6ee8963?utm_source=github-cloud-app&utm_medium=referral&page=upgrade-pr
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants