Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rec: use multiple targets for the named forward test #14692

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 23, 2024

Conversation

omoerbeek
Copy link
Member

This tries to work around the occasional GH networking issues

Short description

Checklist

I have:

  • read the CONTRIBUTING.md document
  • compiled this code
  • tested this code
  • included documentation (including possible behaviour changes)
  • documented the code
  • added or modified regression test(s)
  • added or modified unit test(s)
  • checked that this code was merged to master

@omoerbeek omoerbeek added the rec label Sep 19, 2024
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Sep 19, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 10942936811

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • 16 unchanged lines in 6 files lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.06%) to 64.713%

Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
pdns/dnsdistdist/dnsdist-crypto.cc 1 76.01%
modules/gpgsqlbackend/gpgsqlbackend.cc 1 88.62%
pdns/recursordist/sortlist.cc 2 72.94%
pdns/recursordist/rec-main.cc 3 62.09%
modules/godbcbackend/sodbc.cc 4 70.8%
pdns/signingpipe.cc 5 84.99%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 10939216509: 0.06%
Covered Lines: 124826
Relevant Lines: 162215

💛 - Coveralls

This tries to work around the occasional GH networking issues
@omoerbeek omoerbeek merged commit 84de0de into PowerDNS:master Sep 23, 2024
79 checks passed
@omoerbeek omoerbeek deleted the rec-named-forw-multiple branch September 23, 2024 14:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants