stake out SIPs 11 and 12

SIPS/sip-11.md

@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+---
+sip: 11
+title: Interface for Seaport App Marketplace Adapters [provisional stub]
+description: A consistent interface for contract offerers that interface with other marketplaces.
+author: 0age (@0age), Daniel Viau (@djviau)
+discussions-to: https://github.com/ProjectOpenSea/SIPs/discussions/
+status: Draft
+type: Standards
+category: Interface
+created: 2023-07-21
+requires: 5, 6
+---
+
+## Abstract
+
+This SIP will outline the standard practices for implementing adapters that interface with other marketplaces.
+
+## Motivation
+
+TODO
+
+## Specification
+
+The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 and RFC 8174.
+
+### Requirements
+
+TODO
+
+### Interface
+
+TODO
+
+### Substandards
+
+TODO
+
+## Rationale
+
+TODO
+
+## Backwards Compatibility
+
+As a newly proposed standard there is no issue with backwards compatibility.
+
+## Test Cases
+
+TODO
+
+## Reference Implementation
+
+TODO
+
+## Security Considerations
+
+TODO
+
+## Copyright
+
+Copyright and related rights waived via [CC0](../LICENSE.md).

SIPS/sip-12.md

@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+---
+sip: 12
+title: Interface for Seaport App Flashloan Offerers [provisional stub]
+description: A consistent interface for contract offerers that provide flashloans as part of their functionality.
+author: 0age (@0age), Daniel Viau (@djviau)
+discussions-to: https://github.com/ProjectOpenSea/SIPs/discussions/
+status: Draft
+type: Standards
+category: Interface
+created: 2023-07-21
+requires: 5, 6
+---
+
+_This document is currently WIP. Please suggest improvements or changes in the discussions-to link above._
+
+## Abstract
+
+This SIP will outline the standard practices for implementing flashloan offerers as Seaport Apps.
+
+## Motivation
+
+TODO
+
+## Specification
+
+The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 and RFC 8174.
+
+### Requirements
+
+TODO
+
+### Interface
+
+TODO
+
+### Substandards
+
+TODO
+
+## Rationale
+
+TODO
+
+## Backwards Compatibility
+
+As a newly proposed standard there is no issue with backwards compatibility.
+
+## Test Cases
+
+TODO
+
+## Reference Implementation
+
+TODO
+
+## Security Considerations
+
+TODO
+
+## Copyright
+
+Copyright and related rights waived via [CC0](../LICENSE.md).