Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Custom Shufflenetv2 for extremely small and dense objects #528

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vuongnp
Copy link

@vuongnp vuongnp commented Sep 6, 2023

Add new stride: 4
Total strides of the model: 4, 8, 16, 32, 64

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 13, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 56.31068% with 45 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 74.42%. Comparing base (226d8cc) to head (4e25651).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
nanodet/model/backbone/shufflenetv2_dense.py 56.00% 36 Missing and 8 partials ⚠️
nanodet/model/backbone/__init__.py 66.66% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #528      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   74.80%   74.42%   -0.38%     
==========================================
  Files          71       72       +1     
  Lines        4695     4798     +103     
  Branches      731      753      +22     
==========================================
+ Hits         3512     3571      +59     
- Misses        986     1022      +36     
- Partials      197      205       +8     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 74.42% <56.31%> (-0.38%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@RangiLyu
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for your contribution! You can introduce the features of this model in the readme and the comments of the config to let other users know it better.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants