Per ODK XForm spec, the desired output is:

<input ref="/data/my_text">
    <odk:setgeopoint event="xforms-value-changed" ref="/data/my_current_location" />
</input>

This is envisioned to appear in XLSForm as something like:

type                | name                | trigger    | calculation
--------------------+---------------------+------------+------------
background-geopoint | my_current_location | ${my_text} |

Per Forum discussion, there are unresolved issue around both the existing setvalue-based xforms-value-changed events - that apply equally to setgeopoint-based xforms-value-changed events - regarding the relative nesting of the trigger and target in the XML hierarchy, specifically when repeat groups are involved. These issues may result in the addition of new checks to pyxform for existing triggers which also need to be applied to this new question type, in order to flag to the user semantic form issues where the specified trigger and target are 'incompatible'.

@tiritea Should the unresolved issues be moved to a separate issue to keep this feature extension narrower?

Agree, I dont think this ticket should be used to address the more general case of what permutations of trigger and target controls are permitted for xform-value-changed events, not the least of which because they probably apply equally to both setvalue and odk:setgeopoint actions. This ticket is merely to expose something in XLSForm that will map onto the existing XForm support for this feature that exists today in Collect and Enketo, warts and all.

Restricting what permutations of xform-value-changed trigger+target are supported - and what the prescribed behavior should be in these contexts - is a somewhat different issue, which probably needs further careful consideration before adding explicit checks in pyxform to enforce.

This is what I believe the new feature will look like in a very simple XLSForm:

Simple_background_geo.xlsx

and this is what I think it should get translated to in the resulting XForm:

Simple_background_geo.xml.zip

@lognaturel @lindsay-stevens can you perhaps confirm this is also your understanding? [nothwithstanding finalizing the new name to be "background-geopoint" vs "bg-geopoint" vs ...]

Yes, that looks right to me.

Thanks for merging @RuthShryock's changes!

Next obvious, and somewhat expected, question - when might v2.1.2 be coming out with it? :-)

Or should we plan on backporting? Thnx.