Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SWC-6536: handle timing issues related to using larger runner #5184

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 8, 2023

Conversation

hallieswan
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

…fail flaky tests more quickly to reduce cost in CI
…form, confirm login was correct before waiting for redirect
Comment on lines -37 to -41
// This may be the first test to run and trigger SWC compilation
// ...which may take 15+ seconds. Mark this test as slow,
// ...so the test will be given triple timeout.
// https://playwright.dev/docs/api/class-test#test-slow-1
setup.slow()
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Successful auth.setup tests are taking 2-4 seconds on the larger Linux runner, 4-6 seconds locally, and 7-11 seconds on the macOS runner. Generally, this test is much faster than the other e2e tests, so stop marking this test as "slow" -- allow the test to fail faster when flaky, so we spend spend less money on larger runner in CI.

Comment on lines +75 to +82
const usernameInput = page.getByLabel('Username or Email Address')
await usernameInput.fill(testUserName)
await expect(usernameInput).toHaveValue(testUserName)

const passwordInput = page.getByLabel('Password')
await expect(passwordInput).toBeEmpty()
await passwordInput.fill(testUserPassword)
await expect(passwordInput).not.toBeEmpty()
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ensure that the username/password values have been set before trying to sign in

Comment on lines +86 to +92
// Ensure that correct username/password were received
const loadingButton = page.getByRole('button', { name: 'Logging you in' })
await expect(loadingButton).toBeVisible()
await expect(loadingButton).not.toBeVisible()
await expect(
page.getByText('The provided username/password combination is incorrect'),
).not.toBeVisible()
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Confirm that the correct username/password were received, hopefully will help us troubleshoot if login fails to redirect as in this run

@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ dotenv.config()
export default defineConfig({
testDir: './e2e',
/* Timeout to allow portal enough time to compile when running locally */
timeout: 5 * 60 * 1000,
timeout: 2 * 60 * 1000,
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reduce overall test timeout, so flaky tests fail faster -- currently, the longest test (teams.loggedin) takes about 25s locally, 17s on larger runner, and 35-40s on macOS runner, so 2 minutes should be enough time for now. If we add a longer test in the future, we can configure a longer timeout just for that test.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like the idea of having these fail faster if making these longer doesn't substantially make these less flaky. Optimizing for resilience is good, but I wouldn't worry much about shaving seconds or minutes off to save money.

@hallieswan hallieswan marked this pull request as ready for review September 8, 2023 17:15
@hallieswan hallieswan self-assigned this Sep 8, 2023
@hallieswan hallieswan merged commit eb23290 into Sage-Bionetworks:develop Sep 8, 2023
2 checks passed
@hallieswan hallieswan deleted the SWC-6536 branch September 8, 2023 19:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants