Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GHA automated testing #154

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 6, 2024

Conversation

RiyaRaj28
Copy link
Contributor

@RiyaRaj28 RiyaRaj28 commented Jul 5, 2024

Checklist

Description

Automated Testing for every PR

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated greeting message in file upload service to "Hello World from file upload."
  • Tests

    • Adjusted end-to-end tests to match the new greeting message in the file upload service.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 5, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@techsavvyash has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 15 minutes and 55 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 88bc3df and f2ccf59.

Walkthrough

The recent updates involve introducing a new Github Actions workflow, test.yml, that automates testing for different directories. Additionally, changes were made to the AppService and a related end-to-end test of the file-upload sample, updating their greeting message.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.github/workflows/test.yml Introduced test.yml with test-package and test-sample jobs for automated testing.
sample/06-file-upload/src/... AppService class’s getHello() method updated to return a new greeting message.
sample/06-file-upload/test/... e2e test expectation updated to match the new greeting message from AppService.

Poem

In the world of code, a change so grand,
With greetings updated, oh so planned.
Actions now test with a swift command,
Hello from uploads, isn't that just grand?
🌐✨👩‍💻


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f8221bb and 465d525.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
  • sample/06-file-upload/src/app.service.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • sample/06-file-upload/src/app.service.ts
Additional comments not posted (8)
.github/workflows/test.yml (8)

14-19: Verify the relevance of directories in the matrix.

Ensure that all specified directories ('file-upload', 'interceptor', 'monitoring', 'temporal') are relevant and exist in the repository.

Verification successful

Verified the relevance of directories in the matrix.

All specified directories ('file-upload', 'interceptor', 'monitoring', 'temporal') exist in the repository and are relevant to the matrix strategy in the test-package job.

  • file-upload
  • interceptor
  • monitoring
  • temporal
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of specified directories in the matrix.

# Test: Check if the directories exist. Expect: All directories should exist.
for dir in file-upload interceptor monitoring temporal; do
  if [ ! -d "packages/common/test/$dir" ]; then
    echo "Directory $dir does not exist."
    exit 1
  fi
done
echo "All directories exist."

Length of output: 478


27-29: Ensure npm ci is appropriate for dependency installation.

npm ci is used for clean installation of dependencies. Verify if this is the intended behavior.

Verification successful

npm ci is appropriate for dependency installation.

The presence of package-lock.json confirms that npm ci is the intended behavior for a clean and consistent installation of dependencies.

  • packages/common/package-lock.json exists.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if `npm ci` is the intended behavior for dependency installation.

# Test: Check if `package-lock.json` exists. Expect: `package-lock.json` should exist for `npm ci` to work correctly.
if [ ! -f "packages/common/package-lock.json" ]; then
  echo "package-lock.json does not exist."
  exit 1
fi
echo "package-lock.json exists."

Length of output: 111


21-23: Use the latest version of actions/checkout.

Ensure that the specified version (v4.1.7) of actions/checkout is the latest release.

Verification successful

The specified version of actions/checkout is already the latest.

The actions/checkout version v4.1.7 used in the workflow file is the most recent release.

  • .github/workflows/test.yml: lines 21-23
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the latest version of `actions/checkout`.

# Test: Check the latest version of `actions/checkout`. Expect: The latest version should be `v4.1.7` or higher.
gh api -H "Accept: application/vnd.github.v3+json" /repos/actions/checkout/releases/latest | jq -r '.tag_name'

Length of output: 117


39-46: Verify the relevance of directories in the matrix.

Ensure that all specified directories ('02-monitoring', '03-response-formatting', '04-logging', '05-temporal-package', '06-file-upload') are relevant and exist in the repository.

Verification successful

The directories specified in the matrix strategy exist.

All specified directories ('02-monitoring', '03-response-formatting', '04-logging', '05-temporal-package', '06-file-upload') are present in the repository.

  • No issues found with the directory configuration in the matrix.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of specified directories in the matrix.

# Test: Check if the directories exist. Expect: All directories should exist.
for dir in '02-monitoring' '03-response-formatting' '04-logging' '05-temporal-package' '06-file-upload'; do
  if [ ! -d "sample/$dir" ]; then
    echo "Directory $dir does not exist."
    exit 1
  fi
done
echo "All directories exist."

Length of output: 787


48-50: Use the latest version of actions/checkout.

Ensure that the specified version (v4) of actions/checkout is the latest release.

Verification successful

The specified version v4 of actions/checkout is the latest major release.

  • The latest release of actions/checkout is v4.1.7, which confirms that v4 is the latest major version.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the latest version of `actions/checkout`.

# Test: Check the latest version of `actions/checkout`. Expect: The latest version should be `v4` or higher.
gh api -H "Accept: application/vnd.github.v3+json" /repos/actions/checkout/releases/latest | jq -r '.tag_name'

Length of output: 117


24-26: Use the latest version of actions/setup-node.

Ensure that the specified version (v4) of actions/setup-node is the latest release.

Verification successful

The version v4 of actions/setup-node is up-to-date.

The latest release of actions/setup-node is v4.0.2, and the workflow file correctly specifies the latest major version (v4).

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the latest version of `actions/setup-node`.

# Test: Check the latest version of `actions/setup-node`. Expect: The latest version should be `v4` or higher.
gh api -H "Accept: application/vnd.github.v3+json" /repos/actions/setup-node/releases/latest | jq -r '.tag_name'

Length of output: 119


51-53: Use the latest version of actions/setup-node.

Ensure that the specified version (v4) of actions/setup-node is the latest release.

Verification successful

The specified version (v4) of actions/setup-node is up-to-date.

The latest release of actions/setup-node is v4.0.2, and the current code correctly references the major version v4, which will automatically use the latest patch version.

  • No changes required.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the latest version of `actions/setup-node`.

# Test: Check the latest version of `actions/setup-node`. Expect: The latest version should be `v4` or higher.
gh api -H "Accept: application/vnd.github.v3+json" /repos/actions/setup-node/releases/latest | jq -r '.tag_name'

Length of output: 119


54-56: Ensure yarn install is appropriate for dependency installation.

yarn install is used for installing dependencies. Verify if this is the intended behavior.

Verification successful

Ensure yarn install is appropriate for dependency installation.

yarn install is used for installing dependencies. Based on the inspection of the package.json files, it is confirmed that yarn install is appropriate for dependency installation in the specified directories.

  • The package.json files exist in all specified directories.
  • There are no configurations or custom scripts that alter the default behavior of yarn install.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if `yarn install` is the intended behavior for dependency installation.

# Test: Check if `package.json` exists. Expect: `package.json` should exist for `yarn install` to work correctly.
for dir in '02-monitoring' '03-response-formatting' '04-logging' '05-temporal-package' '06-file-upload'; do
  if [ ! -f "sample/$dir/package.json" ]; then
    echo "package.json does not exist in $dir."
    exit 1
  fi
done
echo "package.json exists."

Length of output: 848


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for custom scripts or configurations in `package.json` files.

# Test: Inspect `package.json` files for custom scripts or configurations.
for dir in '02-monitoring' '03-response-formatting' '04-logging' '05-temporal-package' '06-file-upload'; do
  echo "Inspecting sample/$dir/package.json for custom scripts or configurations..."
  jq '.scripts' "sample/$dir/package.json"
  jq '.config' "sample/$dir/package.json"
done

Length of output: 4786

.github/workflows/test.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/test.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/test.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/test.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines 14 to 18
dir:
- 'file-upload'
- 'interceptor'
- 'monitoring'
- 'temporal'
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

as mentioned by code rabbit, I don't suppose this is required.

@@ -3,6 +3,6 @@ import { Injectable } from '@nestjs/common';
@Injectable()
export class AppService {
getHello(): string {
return 'Hello World from sample/07-file-upload!';
return 'Hello World!';
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

instead of doing this, update the expect statement in the e2e test.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 465d525 and c084274.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
  • sample/06-file-upload/src/app.service.ts (1 hunks)
  • sample/06-file-upload/test/app.e2e-spec.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • sample/06-file-upload/test/app.e2e-spec.ts
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml
  • sample/06-file-upload/src/app.service.ts

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c084274 and 88bc3df.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
  • sample/06-file-upload/src/app.service.ts (1 hunks)
  • sample/06-file-upload/test/app.e2e-spec.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml
  • sample/06-file-upload/src/app.service.ts
  • sample/06-file-upload/test/app.e2e-spec.ts

@techsavvyash techsavvyash merged commit f75e48f into SamagraX-Stencil:main Jul 6, 2024
6 of 9 checks passed
@techsavvyash techsavvyash mentioned this pull request Jul 6, 2024
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants