-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add note on differences from standard CosmWasm Sub-message Behavior #165
base: gitbook
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Sub-message behavior is different on secret network than standard CosmWasm and I think it should be noted
Note differences from standard CosmWasm: | ||
* Obtaining contract data instantiated w/ sub-messages: | ||
* `msg.result.events` from `msg: Reply` passed into `#entry_point pub fn reply(deps: DepsMut, _env: Env, msg: Reply) -> StdResult<Response>` should be used to obtain data, such as `contract_address`, after instantiating a contract. Standard CosmWasm will return `MsgInstantiateContractResponse` data as protobuf binary inside `msg.result.data`. However `msg.result.data` currently returns no binary data on Secret Network v1.4. Thus, utilies such as [`parse_instantiate_response_data`](https://github.com/scrtlabs/cw-plus/blob/14a9db7e8b93039fa856cbe126ffdb230a00734a/packages/utils/src/parse_reply.rs#L106) from `cw-utils` will not work. | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey, I'm not sure I understand the difference any chance you can comment with an example of how the data is serialized on other cw 1 chain compared to SCRT serialization?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The difference is that cw 1 chains have
msg.result.data = **MsgInstantiateContractResponse protobuf binary**
for example terraswap decodes that data here:
https://github.com/terraswap/terraswap/blob/48e399eaa2e89cca4da8c7b20c9f5512a47ec36d/contracts/terraswap_factory/src/contract.rs#L231
But on secret 1.4.0: msg.result.data
just returns null
I'm guessing it's a bug, based on this comment:
// note: even if contractAddr == nil then contractAddr.String() is ok // \o/🤷🤷♂️🤷♀️🤦🤦♂️🤦♀️
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
INFO [enclave_contract_engine::wasm::engine] Invoking reply() in wasm
INFO [enclave_contract_engine::wasm::contract] debug_print: "AAAAAAAAA!"
INFO [enclave_contract_engine::wasm::contract] debug_print: "msg.result.unwrap().data: !"
INFO [enclave_contract_engine::wasm::contract] debug_print: "msg.result.unwrap().events: [Event { ty: \"instantiate\", attributes: [Attribute { key: \"code_id\", value: \"3\", encrypted: true }, Attribute { key: \"contract_address\", value: \"secret1sh36qn08g4cqg685cfzmyxqv2952q6r8vqktuh\", encrypted: true }] }, Event { ty: \"wasm\", attributes: [Attribute { key: \"contract_address\", value: \"secret1sh36qn08g4cqg685cfzmyxqv2952q6r8vqktuh\", encrypted: true }] }]!"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As you can see no data is returned for msg.result.data
But, on other chains they get:
msg.result.data = **MsgInstantiateContractResponse protobuf binary**
@liorbond can this be merged or do we need to explain it differently? |
Maybe it should just be an issue in the secret network repo @ertemann |
Unless the behavior is intended |
Is this still relevant? |
I made an issue here. I don't think anything was done about this. |
Sub-message behavior is different on secret network than standard CosmWasm and I think it should be noted