Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: lowercase operators support in the where clause is updated #3657

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Oct 6, 2023

Conversation

palashgdev
Copy link
Contributor

close #3645

@palashgdev palashgdev requested review from nityanandagohain and a team October 3, 2023 04:58
@palashgdev palashgdev self-assigned this Oct 3, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 3, 2023
Copy link
Member

@nityanandagohain nityanandagohain left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Screen.Recording.2023-10-03.at.2.54.18.PM.mov

@palashgdev please check this

@nityanandagohain
Copy link
Member

Screen.Recording.2023-10-04.at.11.42.07.AM.mov

@palashgdev
Copy link
Contributor Author

Screen.Recording.2023-10-04.at.11.42.07.AM.mov

i am still working over this one above issue is still not fixed

@nityanandagohain
Copy link
Member

ohh okay

@palashgdev palashgdev marked this pull request as ready for review October 4, 2023 14:59
@ankitnayan ankitnayan changed the title feat: lowercase operators suuport in the where clause is updated feat: lowercase operators support in the where clause is updated Oct 5, 2023
Copy link
Member

@nityanandagohain nityanandagohain left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@palashgdev please create a new issue for supporting update in operators.

@palashgdev palashgdev merged commit 0e04b77 into develop Oct 6, 2023
8 checks passed
@palashgdev palashgdev deleted the feat/3645 branch October 6, 2023 12:02
@srikanthccv
Copy link
Member

Can we please spend some time doing some minimum testing? It reflects very poorly on us. I would revert this immediately. I haven't tried anything complicated.

https://www.loom.com/share/68d339549bf140adb18390d8dcd85ded.

@nityanandagohain
Copy link
Member

Thanks Srikanth for pointing it out, I mostly checked things related to upercasing and lowercasing. But a lot seems to be missed while testing.

I think for critical parts like this unit tests would have helped right ? @palashgdev @YounixM

@YounixM
Copy link
Member

YounixM commented Oct 9, 2023

Unit tests do help with this and we will be starting to for few flows this week, however, when core functionalities are worked upon, we need to test all the possible flows and then provide signoff. Due to time constraints, we might not be able to add test cases for every possible flow, but we should spend some testing the core functionalities.

I agree with @srikanthccv. Let's revert this PR and fix all bugs around this and then merge.

@ankitnayan
Copy link
Collaborator

@YounixM if you could enable more devs to add tests easily, we all can chip-in to cover more test cases

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request frontend
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

QB: [FE] Support for case independent operators
5 participants