-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
/
spatial_analysis.Rmd
594 lines (483 loc) · 17.3 KB
/
spatial_analysis.Rmd
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
---
title: "Advanced Spatial Analysis"
author:
- name: Marc Elosua & Paula Nieto
affiliation:
- Centro Nacional de Análisis Genómico (CNAG)
email: [email protected] & [email protected]
date: '`r format(Sys.Date(), "%d/%m/%Y")`'
output:
html_document:
includes:
in_header: banner.html
---
```{r setup, include=FALSE}
knitr::opts_chunk$set(echo = TRUE, warning = FALSE, message = FALSE)
```
# Analysis of Spatial Data
We are going to analyze an invasive ductal carcinoma breast tissue section from [10x Genomicsis](https://www.10xgenomics.com/) Visium Gene Expression platform.
For the analysis we will mainly use the R package [Seurat](https://satijalab.org/seurat/index.html).
## Download Data
You can download the data from [this website](https://www.10xgenomics.com/resources/datasets/human-breast-cancer-block-a-section-1-1-standard-1-1-0) or using `curl`, as shown below. We do not need to do it because it is already in the `data` folder.
```{bash, eval = FALSE}
# download files
curl -O https://cf.10xgenomics.com/samples/spatial-exp/1.1.0/V1_Breast_Cancer_Block_A_Section_1/V1_Breast_Cancer_Block_A_Section_1_filtered_feature_bc_matrix.h5
curl -O https://cf.10xgenomics.com/samples/spatial-exp/1.1.0/V1_Breast_Cancer_Block_A_Section_1/V1_Breast_Cancer_Block_A_Section_1_spatial.tar.gz
```
## Libraries
These are the libraries we are going to use:
```{r libraries}
library(tidyverse)
library(Seurat)
library(patchwork)
```
```{r seed}
# set seed for reproducibility purposes
set.seed(1243)
# create palette for the cell types from the pals package
cell_type_palette <- c(
"#5A5156", "#E4E1E3", "#F6222E", "#FE00FA",
"#16FF32", "#3283FE", "#FEAF16", "#B00068",
"#1CFFCE", "#90AD1C", "#2ED9FF", "#DEA0FD",
"#AA0DFE", "#F8A19F", "#325A9B", "#C4451C",
"#1C8356", "#85660D", "#B10DA1", "#FBE426",
"#1CBE4F", "#FA0087", "#FC1CBF", "#F7E1A0",
"#C075A6", "#782AB6", "#AAF400", "#BDCDFF",
"#822E1C", "#B5EFB5", "#7ED7D1", "#1C7F93",
"#D85FF7", "#683B79", "#66B0FF", "#3B00FB")
```
## Load data with Seurat
We start by loading the data Visium data. Note that here we start by already
loading the filtered expression data. This means that we are only keeping those
spots that overlap with the tissue as determined by `spaceranger`.
If we expect there to be overpermabilization of the tissue or want to get a more
general look we can load the raw HDF5 file instead. The raw file contains the
matrix for all 5.000 spots comprising the capture area.
```{r load-spatial}
sp_obj <- Load10X_Spatial(
data.dir = "data", # Directory where these data is stored
filename = "filtered_feature_bc_matrix.h5", # Name of H5 file containing the feature barcode matrix
assay = "Spatial", # Name of assay
slice = "slice1", # Name of the image
filter.matrix = TRUE # Only keep spots that have been determined to be over tissue
)
```
The visium data from 10x consists is stored in a Seurat object. This object has
a very similar structure to the scRNAseq object:
* A spot x gene expression matrix (similar to the cell x gene matrix)
```{r}
sp_obj[["Spatial"]][1:5, 1:5]
```
* H&E Image of the tissue slice (obtained from staining during sample processing in the lab)
It adds one slot which contains the images of the Visium experiments as seen below:
```{r}
sp_obj@images
```
We can visualize the image as follows (we will also store this for later):
```{r fig.width=5, fig.height=5}
(img <- SpatialPlot(
sp_obj, # Name of the Seurat Object
pt.size = 0, # Point size to see spots on the tissue
crop = FALSE # Wether to crop to see only tissue section
) +
NoLegend()
)
```
* Scaling factors that relate the original high resolution image to the lower
resolution image used here for visualization.
```{r}
sp_obj@[email protected]
```
## Quality control
The goal of this step is to remove poor quality spots and lowly captured genes.
To do so we will go over some basic QC steps. Furthermore, due to the nature of
the assay during library preparation there can be some lateral diffusion of
transcripts. If there are spots not overlapping with the tissue we also need to
remove them since these are artifacts of the experiment.
As with single-cell objects, we have some important features that we can use to
filter out bad quality spots.
* *nCount_Spatial*: number of UMIs per spot
```{r fig.width=18, fig.height=6}
umi_vln_plt <- VlnPlot(
sp_obj,
features = "nCount_Spatial",
pt.size = 0.1) +
NoLegend()
umi_sp_plt <- SpatialFeaturePlot(
sp_obj,
features = "nCount_Spatial")
umi_vln_plt | umi_sp_plt | img
```
The variability in the distribution of UMIs is related to the tissue
architecture, i.e. tumoral regions have a higher cell density than fibrotic
regions and thus overlapping spots contain higher counts.
* *nFeature_Spatial*: number of genes per spot
```{r fig.width=18, fig.height=6}
feat_vln_plt <- VlnPlot(
sp_obj,
features = "nFeature_Spatial",
pt.size = 0.1) +
NoLegend()
feat_sp_plt <- SpatialFeaturePlot(
sp_obj,
features = "nFeature_Spatial")
feat_vln_plt | feat_sp_plt | img
```
Again, here we can see how the number of genes per spot correlates with the
structure of the tissue.
* *mt.content* and *rb.content*: mitochondrial and ribosomal content per spot, respectively
We have to compute this two values by calculating the percentage of reads per
spot that belong to mitochondrial/ribosomal genes.
```{r}
# Mitochondrial content
sp_obj[["mt.content"]] <- PercentageFeatureSet(
object = sp_obj,
pattern = "^MT-")
summary(sp_obj[["mt.content"]])
```
```{r fig.width=10}
# Ral contentibosomal
sp_obj[["rb.content"]] <- PercentageFeatureSet(
object = sp_obj,
pattern = "^RPL|^RPS")
summary(sp_obj[["rb.content"]])
```
```{r fig.width=12, fig.height=6}
SpatialFeaturePlot(
sp_obj,
features = c("mt.content", "rb.content"))
```
In the case of spatial data, high mitochondrial content is not necessarily
an indicator of bad quality spots. Therefore, on its own it is not sufficient to
determine which spots to filter out. In this case, they are not pointing towards
low quality regions but seem to be reflecting the biological structure of the
tissue.
### Gene filtering
Before filtering:
```{r}
sp_obj
```
We are going to filter out genes that have no expression in the tissue.
```{r}
table(rowSums(as.matrix(sp_obj@assays$Spatial@counts)) == 0)
keep_genes <- rowSums(as.matrix(sp_obj@assays$Spatial@counts)) != 0
sp_obj <- sp_obj[keep_genes, ]
```
We see how we remove 11.678 genes while keeping 24.923.
### Spot filtering
Furthermore, we set a threshold to filter out spots with very low number of
counts (< 500) before proceeding with the downstream analysis. As we can see
there are no spots with <500 UMIs so we will not remove any of them.
```{r}
table(colSums(as.matrix(sp_obj@assays$Spatial@counts)) < 500)
sp_obj <- subset(
sp_obj,
subset = nCount_Spatial > 500)
```
After filtering:
```{r}
sp_obj
```
## Preprocessing
Similar to single-cell datasets, preprocessing for spatial data requires
normalization, identification of variable features and scaling the counts.
To carry out these steps we will use SCTransform which takes into account that
different spot complexities observed. Spots overlapping more cell-dense regions
will have more UMIs. If we use standard Log Normalization we are removing this
biological signal from the dataset.
```{r sct}
sp_obj <- SCTransform(
sp_obj,
assay = "Spatial", # assay to pull the count data from
ncells = ncol(sp_obj), # Number of subsampling Spots used to build NB regression, in this case use all
variable.features.n = 3000, # variable features to use after ranking by residual variance
verbose = FALSE
)
```
Prior to clustering, we perform dimensionality reduction via PCA. We then look
at the elbow plot to assess the right number of principal components (PC) to
use for downstream analysis.
```{r}
sp_obj <- RunPCA(
sp_obj,
npcs = 50
)
ElbowPlot(
sp_obj,
ndims = 50
)
```
We see an elbow at 15 PC, after that the standard deviations are pretty much
flat indicating that they aren't contributing much information. To reduce
computational resources and noise we proceed with the first 15 PCs and add
another 10 for a total of 25 PCs to make sure we are not loosing biological
signal while reducing the noise.
```{r umap}
sp_obj <- RunUMAP(
sp_obj,
reduction = "pca",
dims = 1:25
)
```
## Clustering and visualization
Next we compute the K nearest neighbors and find an optimal number of clusters
using shared nearest neighbor Louvain modularity based clustering.
```{r clustering}
sp_obj <- FindNeighbors(
sp_obj,
reduction = "pca",
dims = 1:20
)
sp_obj <- FindClusters(
sp_obj,
resolution = 0.3
)
```
Look at the clustering in the UMAP space and on the tissue:
```{r fig.width=12, fig.height=6}
umap_plt <- DimPlot(
sp_obj,
label = TRUE
)
sp_plt <- SpatialDimPlot(
sp_obj
) +
NoLegend()
umap_plt + sp_plt
```
## Gene expression and annotation
ESR1 and ERBB2 (HER2) are the two of the most common mutations in breast cancer, so one
way of annotating the tissue is by looking at ESR1 and ERBB2 positive/negative
regions.
```{r fig.width=18, fig.height=6}
SpatialFeaturePlot(
sp_obj,
features = c("ESR1", "ERBB2"),
alpha = c(0.1, 1)
) +
(SpatialDimPlot(
sp_obj,
label = TRUE
) +
NoLegend())
```
From the expression of the two genes above we can do a high-level annotation.
```{r annotation}
mutate(annotation = case_when(
SCT_snn_res.0.3 == 0 ~ "Fibrotic",
SCT_snn_res.0.3 == 1 ~ "Fibrotic",
SCT_snn_res.0.3 == 2 ~ "HER2-/ESR1-",
SCT_snn_res.0.3 == 3 ~ "HER2-/ESR1+",
SCT_snn_res.0.3 == 4 ~ "HER2+/ESR1+",
SCT_snn_res.0.3 == 5 ~ "HER2+/ESR1-",
SCT_snn_res.0.3 == 6 ~ "HER2-/ESR1-",
SCT_snn_res.0.3 == 7 ~ "HER2-/ESR1-",
SCT_snn_res.0.3 == 8 ~ "HER2-/ESR1-")
)
```
Look at the annotation
```{r fig.width=6, fig.height=6}
# We will define a palette (this is optional)
annot_pal <- c("#E41A1C", "#FF7F00", "#984EA3", "#4DAF4A", "#377EB8")
names(annot_pal) <- c("Fibrotic", "HER2-/ESR1-", "HER2-/ESR1+", "HER2+/ESR1-", "HER2+/ESR1+")
SpatialDimPlot(
sp_obj,
group.by = "annotation",
cols = annot_pal
)
```
## Deconvolution
We are going to use [SPOTlight](https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/49/9/e50/6129341?login=true) in conjunction with a subset of the [Tumor Immune Cell Atlas](https://genome.cshlp.org/content/31/10/1913) to deconvolute our spots and map immune populations to our tumor section.
```{r spotlight}
# load library
library(SPOTlight)
library(NMF)
```
Load downsampled version of the Tumor Immune Cell Atlas and explore the metadata
we have. We are going to use annotation level 1 for the deconvolution
(`lv1_annot`). Moreover, since the origin of these cells is from different
organs and papers we want to minize batch effect. To do so we will only select
cells coming from one cancer type which has enough cells for all cell types.
```{r load-sc}
atlas <- readRDS("R_obj/TICAtlas_downsample.rds")
head([email protected])
table([email protected]$lv1_annot)
```
### Marker genes
First of all we need to compute the markers for the cell types using Seurat's
function `FindAllMarkers`.
```{r marker-genes, eval = FALSE}
Idents(atlas) <- "lv1_annot"
sc_markers <- FindAllMarkers(
object = atlas,
assay = "RNA",
slot = "data",
only.pos = TRUE
)
saveRDS(sc_markers, "R_obj/filtered_atlas_markers.rds")
```
```{r}
sc_markers <- readRDS("R_obj/filtered_atlas_markers.rds")
sc_markers %>%
group_by(cluster) %>%
top_n(5, wt = avg_log2FC) %>%
DT::datatable()
```
### Run Deconvolution
Run the deconvolution using the scRNAseq atlas and the spatial transcriptomics data.
```{r deconvolution, eval = FALSE}
decon_mtrx_ls <- spotlight_deconvolution(
se_sc = atlas, # Single-cell dataset
counts_spatial = sp_obj@assays$Spatial@counts,
clust_vr = "lv1_annot", # Label to use for the deconvolution (cell types)
cluster_markers = sc_markers, # Cell type markers
hvg = 3000, # Number of HVGs to use on top of the markers
min_cont = 0, # minimum expected contribution per cell type and spot
assay = "RNA",
slot = "counts"
)
saveRDS(decon_mtrx_ls, "R_obj/deconvolution_ls.rds")
```
```{r}
decon_mtrx_ls <- readRDS("R_obj/deconvolution_ls.rds")
```
### Deconvolution assesment
Before even looking at the decomposed spots we can gain insight on how well the model performed by looking at the topic profiles for the cell types.
```{r}
nmf_mod <- decon_mtrx_ls[[1]]
decon_mtrx <- decon_mtrx_ls[[2]]
rownames(decon_mtrx) <- colnames(sp_obj)
# info on the NMF model
nmf_mod[[1]]
# deconvolution matrix
head(decon_mtrx)
```
Look at how specific the topic profiles are for each cell type. Ideally we want
to see how each cell type has its own unique topic profile. This means the model
has learnt a unique gene signature for that cell type.
```{r fig.height=10, fig.width=10}
h <- NMF::coef(nmf_mod[[1]])
rownames(h) <- paste("Topic", 1:nrow(h), sep = "_")
topic_profile_plts <- SPOTlight::dot_plot_profiles_fun(
h = h,
train_cell_clust = nmf_mod[[2]])
topic_profile_plts[[2]]
```
We also want to take a look at the topic profiles of the individual cells.
We want to see how all the cells from the same cell type share the same topic
profiles to make sure the learned signature is robust. In this plot each facet
shows all the cells from the same cell type.
```{r fig.width=25, fig.height=25}
topic_profile_plts[[1]] +
theme(axis.text.x = element_blank())
```
Lastly we can take a look at which genes the model learned for each topic.
Higher values indicate that the gene is more relevant for that topic.
In the below table we can see how the top genes for topic 1 are characteristic
for B cells (i.e. *CD79A*, *CD79B*, *MS4A1*, *IGHD*...).
```{r basis-dt}
sign <- basis(nmf_mod[[1]])
colnames(sign) <- paste0("Topic", seq_len(ncol(sign)))
# This can be dynamically visualized with DT as shown below
DT::datatable(sign, filter = "top")
```
### Deconvolution visualization
Let's now visualize how the deconvoluted spots on the the Seurat object.
```{r}
# We will only add the deconvolution matrix
decon_mtrx <- decon_mtrx_ls[[2]]
decon_mtrx <- decon_mtrx[, colnames(decon_mtrx) != "res_ss"]
decon_mtrx <- decon_mtrx[, !is.na(colnames(decon_mtrx))]
# Set as 0 those cell types that contribute <2% to the spot
decon_mtrx[decon_mtrx < 0.02] <- 0
```
```{r eval = FALSE}
# Add deconvolution results to Seurat object
[email protected] <- cbind([email protected], decon_mtrx)
saveRDS(sp_obj, "R_obj/breast_slide_deconvoluted.rds")
```
We have an object with the deconvolution information already added:
```{r}
sp_obj <- readRDS("R_obj/breast_slide_deconvoluted.rds")
```
The first thing we can do is look at the spatial scatterpie. This plot
represents each spot as an individual piechart where the proportion of each
cell type within that spot is represented.
```{r}
ct <- colnames(decon_mtrx)
scatterpie_plot(
se_obj = sp_obj,
cell_types_all = ct,
pie_scale = 0.3) +
coord_fixed(ratio = 1) +
scale_fill_manual(values = cell_type_palette)
```
As we can see when we look at all the cell types at the same time we are not
able to discern clear patterns. To improve the visualization we will remove
those cell types that are found in >80% of the spot and keep those that aren't
ubiquitouslyy expressed.
```{r}
# keep only cell types that are present in less than 80% of the spots
keep_0.8 <- colSums([email protected][, ct] > 0) < 0.8 * ncol(sp_obj)
# but not those that were not found on the tissue
keep_g0 <- colSums([email protected][, ct] > 0) > 0
# select cell types fullfiling the conditions
ct_var <- colnames([email protected][, ct])[keep_0.8 & keep_g0]
ct_var
```
Plot the spatial scatterpie only with the cell types of interest
```{r}
scatterpie_plot(
se_obj = sp_obj,
cell_types_all = ct_var,
pie_scale = 0.3) +
coord_fixed(ratio = 1) +
scale_fill_manual(values = cell_type_palette)
```
Next, we can visualize the individual cell type proportions on the spatial slide.
```{r fig.width=25, fig.height=32}
scaleFUN <- function(x) sprintf("%.2f", x)
SpatialPlot(
object = sp_obj,
features = ct,
alpha = c(0, 1),
ncol = 4, image.alpha = 0) &
scale_fill_gradientn(
colors = grDevices::heat.colors(10, rev = TRUE),
# 2 decimals in the legend
labels = scaleFUN,
n.breaks = 4)
```
Lets now see the frequencies of selected cell types across the regions in the tissue.
We will focus on pre-exhausted T cells and macrophages as they can give an idea of how
infiltrated the tumor can be.
```{r fig.height=10, fig.width=9}
VlnPlot(
sp_obj,
features = c("Monocytes", "TAMs.C1QC", "TAMs.proinflamatory", "CD8.terminally.exhausted", "CD8.pre.exhausted"),
group.by = "annotation",
cols = annot_pal,
pt.size = 0.2
)
```
```{r}
plt_annot <- SpatialDimPlot(
sp_obj,
group.by = "annotation",
cols = annot_pal
)
img | plt_annot
```
We can see that in the HER2+/ESR1- (dark red) region we have an abundance of pre-exhausted CD8
T cells as well as pro-inflamatory macrophages. The presence of both subtypes at the
same time in a tumor region, can be indicative of the presence of a highly infiltrated
tumor, often referred to as a "hot" tumor.
This type of tumors often have a better response to treatment, opposite to cold regions,
where little to no immune cells are able to infiltrate the tumor, conforming a immune
excluded section, often linked to worse treatment response.
***
<a href="#top">Back to top</a>
```{r}
sessionInfo()
```