Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add note to Domain Manager guide about Identity Federation #178

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

markus-hentsch
Copy link
Contributor

This came up in a past IAM community call. Domain Manager functionality is unavailable for Identity Federation due to identities being managed outside of Keystone in this case.

This PR adds a small note to beginning of the Domain Manager guide to clarify this limitation.

@markus-hentsch markus-hentsch added the SCS-VP10 Related to tender lot SCS-VP10 label Apr 4, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@gtema gtema left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

honestly speaking I am not sure about that. It is very depending on how the federation is done. There is nothing preventing making a federation, landing a federated user in Keystone and admin granting role to it. Moreover, in the case of using domain-driver for the Keycloak integration there is no possibility to have local users at all with all users/groups coming directly from Keycloak. As said - it depends.

@markus-hentsch
Copy link
Contributor Author

honestly speaking I am not sure about that. It is very depending on how the federation is done. There is nothing preventing making a federation, landing a federated user in Keystone and admin granting role to it. Moreover, in the case of using domain-driver for the Keycloak integration there is no possibility to have local users at all with all users/groups coming directly from Keycloak. As said - it depends.

I see, thanks for clarifying. I will close this PR then. If the situation is not as clear cut, we should avoid jumping to wrong conclusions in the documentation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
SCS-VP10 Related to tender lot SCS-VP10
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants