Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add standard for volume backup functionality #567
Add standard for volume backup functionality #567
Changes from 7 commits
47957ab
8e5eb04
1563b7c
db12159
b91620c
73441e4
0beb9f1
c51cf02
1fd8aae
2910844
61b5454
3a853e7
a485855
6967778
58f1c07
9ba095b
b8e73a3
6cb1cc0
c58b535
66cdd6a
125b3bb
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As it is not possible to know as a user, whether a volume backup storage is different from the normal volume storage. We should encourage CSPs to give that information to customers. This could also be done via gaiax credentials, couldn't it? Maybe we need another issue for this part.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This would require a deep dive into the Gaia-X Ontology to figure out whether this can be expressed using Gaia-X Credentials (formerly Self-Descriptions) appropriately.
As long as we don't have a standardized and proven way of representing arbitrary self-description information about an SCS cloud and its services in Gaia-X Credentials, I'm hesitant to add any such suggestions to the standard yet.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I thought so - Maybe we can discuss in the next Standardization SIG meeting or tomorrow, if and how we can use the gaia-x credentials for tests.