Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BugFix] Fix an issue when the privilege is merged,casue root privilge dropped. #46411

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 3, 2024

Conversation

zhangheihei
Copy link
Contributor

@zhangheihei zhangheihei commented May 29, 2024

Why I'm doing:

image

What I'm doing:

Fixes #issue

What type of PR is this:

  • BugFix
  • Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Refactor
  • UT
  • Doc
  • Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

  • Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
  • No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

  • Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
  • Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
  • Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
  • Feature removed
  • Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

  • I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
  • This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
    • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
  • This is a backport pr

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

  • I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto-backported to the target branch
    • 3.3
    • 3.2
    • 3.1
    • 3.0
    • 2.5

@zhangheihei zhangheihei requested a review from a team as a code owner May 29, 2024 11:51
@@ -279,7 +287,7 @@ public void merge(PrivilegeCollectionV2 other) {
} else {
List<PrivilegeEntry> typeList = typeToPrivilegeEntryList.get(typeId);
for (PrivilegeEntry entry : otherList) {
grantObjectToList(entry.actionSet, entry.object, entry.withGrantOption, typeList);
grantObjectToList(entry.actionSet, entry.object, entry.withGrantOption, typeList, true);
} // for privilege entry in other.list
}
} // for typeId, privilegeEntryList in other
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The most risky bug in this code is:
Mixing semantics of isGrant with deep/shallow copy logic potentially leads to incorrect privilege management.

You can modify the code like this:

-            grantObjectToList(entry.actionSet, entry.object, entry.withGrantOption, typeList);
+            grantObjectToList(entry.actionSet, entry.object, entry.withGrantOption, typeList, true);

Specifically, ensure isDeepCopy parameter usage is consistent and aligned with the intention behind cloning or referencing ActionSet objects. This change ensures that whenever we're merging privileges from one collection to another (merge method), we're consciously deciding whether to clone (isDeepCopy = true) or merely reference (isDeepCopy = false) the ActionSet, preventing accidental state manipulation across different privilege entries.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented May 30, 2024

Copy link

[BE Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

Copy link

[FE Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 2 / 2 (100.00%)

file detail

path covered_line new_line coverage not_covered_line_detail
🔵 com/starrocks/privilege/PrivilegeCollectionV2.java 2 2 100.00% []

@zhangheihei
Copy link
Contributor Author

hi @nshangyiming plz reivew the code

@nshangyiming nshangyiming merged commit 2391dd9 into StarRocks:main Jun 3, 2024
82 of 89 checks passed
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 3, 2024

@Mergifyio backport branch-3.3

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the 3.3 label Jun 3, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 3, 2024

@Mergifyio backport branch-3.2

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 3, 2024

@Mergifyio backport branch-3.1

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 3, 2024

@Mergifyio backport branch-3.0

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the 3.0 label Jun 3, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 3, 2024

@Mergifyio backport branch-2.5

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the 2.5 label Jun 3, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jun 3, 2024

backport branch-3.3

✅ Backports have been created

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jun 3, 2024

backport branch-3.2

✅ Backports have been created

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jun 3, 2024

backport branch-3.1

✅ Backports have been created

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jun 3, 2024

backport branch-3.0

✅ Backports have been created

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jun 3, 2024

backport branch-2.5

✅ Backports have been created

mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2024
…e dropped. (#46411)

Signed-off-by: edwinhzhang <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 2391dd9)
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2024
…e dropped. (#46411)

Signed-off-by: edwinhzhang <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 2391dd9)
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2024
…e dropped. (#46411)

Signed-off-by: edwinhzhang <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 2391dd9)
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2024
…e dropped. (#46411)

Signed-off-by: edwinhzhang <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 2391dd9)
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2024
…e dropped. (#46411)

Signed-off-by: edwinhzhang <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 2391dd9)

# Conflicts:
#	fe/fe-core/src/main/java/com/starrocks/privilege/PrivilegeCollection.java
wanpengfei-git pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2024
wanpengfei-git pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2024
wanpengfei-git pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2024
wanpengfei-git pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants