[BugFix]keep connector/catalog map in consistent as much as possible (backport #46995) #47328
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why I'm doing:
There are three maps for createcatalog, which are connectors, catalogs, catalogToAccessControl.
when we create a new catalog, we put new items into these three maps one by one, but there may
be some exception, and only one or two successed, when we create the catalog again, we get
exception that the item has already exist.
What I'm doing:
keep consistent of connector/catalog asap.
Fixes #issue
What type of PR is this:
Does this PR entail a change in behavior?
If yes, please specify the type of change:
Checklist:
Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:
This is an automatic backport of pull request #46995 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). ## Why I'm doing: There are three maps for createcatalog, which are connectors, catalogs, catalogToAccessControl. when we create a new catalog, we put new items into these three maps one by one, but there may be some exception, and only one or two successed, when we create the catalog again, we get exception that the item has already exist.
What I'm doing:
keep consistent of connector/catalog asap.
Fixes #issue
What type of PR is this:
Does this PR entail a change in behavior?
If yes, please specify the type of change:
Checklist: