Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BugFix] Fix the npe of show routine load #50963

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

trueeyu
Copy link
Contributor

@trueeyu trueeyu commented Sep 11, 2024

Why I'm doing:

What I'm doing:

2024-09-11 10:29:29.274+08:00 WARN (starrocks-mysql-nio-pool-0|199) [StmtExecutor.execute():749] execute Exception, sql show routine load
 java.lang.NullPointerException
        at com.starrocks.load.routineload.RoutineLoadJob.getShowInfo(RoutineLoadJob.java:1532)
        at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$3$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:195)
        at java.base/java.util.Spliterators$ArraySpliterator.forEachRemaining(Spliterators.java:948)
        at java.base/java.util.stream.StreamSpliterators$SliceSpliterator$OfRef.forEachRemaining(StreamSpliterators.java:740)
        at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:484)
        at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:474)
        at java.base/java.util.stream.ReduceOps$ReduceTask.doLeaf(ReduceOps.java:952)
        at java.base/java.util.stream.ReduceOps$ReduceTask.doLeaf(ReduceOps.java:926)
        at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractTask.compute(AbstractTask.java:327)
        at java.base/java.util.concurrent.CountedCompleter.exec(CountedCompleter.java:746)
        at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:290)
        at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doInvoke(ForkJoinTask.java:408)
        at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.invoke(ForkJoinTask.java:736)
        at java.base/java.util.stream.ReduceOps$ReduceOp.evaluateParallel(ReduceOps.java:919)
        at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:233)
        at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.collect(ReferencePipeline.java:578)
        at com.starrocks.qe.ShowExecutor$ShowExecutorVisitor.visitShowRoutineLoadStatement(ShowExecutor.java:1143)
        at com.starrocks.qe.ShowExecutor$ShowExecutorVisitor.visitShowRoutineLoadStatement(ShowExecutor.java:286)
        at com.starrocks.sql.ast.ShowRoutineLoadStmt.accept(ShowRoutineLoadStmt.java:169)
        at com.starrocks.sql.ast.AstVisitor.visit(AstVisitor.java:71)
        at com.starrocks.qe.ShowExecutor.execute(ShowExecutor.java:283)
        at com.starrocks.qe.StmtExecutor.handleShow(StmtExecutor.java:1698)
        at com.starrocks.qe.StmtExecutor.execute(StmtExecutor.java:689)
        at com.starrocks.qe.ConnectProcessor.handleQuery(ConnectProcessor.java:360)
        at com.starrocks.qe.ConnectProcessor.dispatch(ConnectProcessor.java:559)
        at com.starrocks.qe.ConnectProcessor.processOnce(ConnectProcessor.java:894)
        at com.starrocks.mysql.nio.ReadListener.lambda$handleEvent$0(ReadListener.java:69)
        at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128)
        at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628)
        at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)

What type of PR is this:

  • BugFix
  • Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Refactor
  • UT
  • Doc
  • Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

  • Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
  • No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

  • Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
  • Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
  • Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
  • Feature removed
  • Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

  • I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
  • This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
    • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
  • This is a backport pr

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

  • I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto-backported to the target branch
    • 3.3
    • 3.2
    • 3.1
    • 3.0
    • 2.5

@trueeyu
Copy link
Contributor Author

trueeyu commented Sep 18, 2024

@Mergifyio rebase main

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 18, 2024

rebase main

✅ Branch has been successfully rebased

@trueeyu
Copy link
Contributor Author

trueeyu commented Sep 18, 2024

https://github.com/Mergifyio rebase main

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 18, 2024

rebase main

✅ Branch has been successfully rebased

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Sep 18, 2024

Copy link

[Java-Extensions Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

Copy link

[FE Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 26 / 27 (96.30%)

file detail

path covered_line new_line coverage not_covered_line_detail
🔵 com/starrocks/load/routineload/PulsarRoutineLoadJob.java 14 15 93.33% [268]
🔵 com/starrocks/load/routineload/RoutineLoadJob.java 12 12 100.00% []

Copy link

[BE Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

@meegoo meegoo enabled auto-merge (squash) September 19, 2024 02:11
@meegoo meegoo merged commit 5bc037d into StarRocks:main Sep 19, 2024
46 checks passed
Copy link

@Mergifyio backport branch-3.3

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the 3.3 label Sep 19, 2024
Copy link

@Mergifyio backport branch-3.2

Copy link

@Mergifyio backport branch-3.1

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 19, 2024

backport branch-3.3

✅ Backports have been created

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 19, 2024

backport branch-3.2

✅ Backports have been created

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 19, 2024

backport branch-3.1

✅ Backports have been created

mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2024
Signed-off-by: trueeyu <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 5bc037d)
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2024
Signed-off-by: trueeyu <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 5bc037d)

# Conflicts:
#	fe/fe-core/src/main/java/com/starrocks/load/routineload/RoutineLoadJob.java
#	fe/fe-core/src/test/java/com/starrocks/load/routineload/RoutineLoadJobTest.java
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2024
Signed-off-by: trueeyu <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 5bc037d)

# Conflicts:
#	fe/fe-core/src/main/java/com/starrocks/load/routineload/RoutineLoadJob.java
#	fe/fe-core/src/test/java/com/starrocks/load/routineload/RoutineLoadJobTest.java
wanpengfei-git pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2024
wanpengfei-git pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants