[Enhancement] add command to show the dropped meta information that can be recovered

[rohitrs1983]

Why I'm doing:

What I'm doing:

Fixes #51006

What type of PR is this:

• BugFix
• Feature
• Enhancement
• Refactor
• UT
• Doc
• Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

• Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
• No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

• Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
• Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
• Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
• Feature removed
• Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

• I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
• This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
  • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
• This is a backport pr

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

• I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto-backported to the target branch
  • 3.3
  • 3.2
  • 3.1
  • 3.0
  • 2.5

[kevincai]

fantastic!

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
20 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[github-actions]

[FE Incremental Coverage Report]

❌ fail : 46 / 88 (52.27%)

file detail

	path	covered_line	new_line	coverage	not_covered_line_detail
🔵	com/starrocks/sql/ast/ShowCatalogRecycleBinStmt.java	0	15	00.00%	[25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 36, 37, 40, 41, 45, 50]
🔵	com/starrocks/sql/ast/AstVisitor.java	0	1	00.00%	[1477]
🔵	com/starrocks/sql/analyzer/AuthorizerStmtVisitor.java	0	11	00.00%	[2525, 2526, 2528, 2529, 2530, 2532, 2533, 2534, 2535, 2536, 2537]
🔵	com/starrocks/qe/ShowExecutor.java	0	3	00.00%	[2682, 2683, 2684]
🔵	com/starrocks/catalog/CatalogRecycleBin.java	46	58	79.31%	[927, 928, 929, 931, 950, 951, 952, 954, 973, 974, 975, 977]

[wyb]

better to implement this insystem table?

[rohitrs1983]

better to implement this insystem table?

@wyb updated to implement in system table.

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
31 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[github-actions]

[Java-Extensions Incremental Coverage Report]

✅ pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

[github-actions]

[BE Incremental Coverage Report]

❌ fail : 0 / 2 (00.00%)

file detail

	path	covered_line	new_line	coverage	not_covered_line_detail
🔵	src/exec/schema_scanner.cpp	0	1	00.00%	[217]
🔵	src/exec/schema_scanner/schema_helper.h	0	1	00.00%	[114]

[kevincai]

@rohitrs1983 @wyb wondering if still needs the show catalog recyle bin, either change it to show proc '/a/b/c' or the system table is good enough.