Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Enhancement] Fix Profile collect bug when log dir is removed #51027

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 23, 2024

Conversation

gengjun-git
Copy link
Contributor

Why I'm doing:

What I'm doing:

Fixes

2024-09-13 20:44:20.822+08:00 ERROR (ProcProfileCollector|72) [Daemon.run():109] daemon thread got exception. name: ProcProfileCollector
java.lang.NullPointerException: null
        at com.starrocks.memory.ProcProfileCollector.deleteExpiredFiles(ProcProfileCollector.java:178) ~[starrocks-fe.jar:?]
        at com.starrocks.memory.ProcProfileCollector.runAfterCatalogReady(ProcProfileCollector.java:75) ~[starrocks-fe.jar:?]
        at com.starrocks.common.util.FrontendDaemon.runOneCycle(FrontendDaemon.java:72) ~[starrocks-fe.jar:?]
        at com.starrocks.common.util.Daemon.run(Daemon.java:107) ~[starrocks-fe.jar:?]

What type of PR is this:

  • BugFix
  • Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Refactor
  • UT
  • Doc
  • Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

  • Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
  • No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

  • Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
  • Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
  • Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
  • Feature removed
  • Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

  • I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
  • This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
    • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
  • This is a backport pr

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

  • I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto-backported to the target branch
    • 3.3
    • 3.2
    • 3.1
    • 3.0
    • 2.5

Signed-off-by: gengjun-git <[email protected]>
@gengjun-git
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Mergifyio rebase

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 19, 2024

rebase

✅ Branch has been successfully rebased

initialized = true;
}
File file = new File(profileLogDir);
file.mkdirs();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

check first? no need to mkdir every time?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is check in mkdirs()

    public boolean mkdirs() {
        if (exists()) {
            return false;
        }
        if (mkdir()) {
            return true;
        }
        File canonFile = null;
        try {
            canonFile = getCanonicalFile();
        } catch (IOException e) {
            return false;
        }

        File parent = canonFile.getParentFile();
        return (parent != null && (parent.mkdirs() || parent.exists()) &&
                canonFile.mkdir());
    }

Signed-off-by: gengjun-git <[email protected]>
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Sep 19, 2024

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
C Reliability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarLint

Copy link

[Java-Extensions Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

Copy link

[FE Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 23 / 28 (82.14%)

file detail

path covered_line new_line coverage not_covered_line_detail
🔵 com/starrocks/memory/ProcProfileCollector.java 23 28 82.14% [132, 134, 135, 141, 180]

Copy link

[BE Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

@gengjun-git gengjun-git enabled auto-merge (squash) September 19, 2024 12:01
@gengjun-git gengjun-git merged commit 598c81c into StarRocks:main Sep 23, 2024
45 of 46 checks passed
Copy link

@Mergifyio backport branch-3.3

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the 3.3 label Sep 23, 2024
Copy link

@Mergifyio backport branch-3.2

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the 3.2 label Sep 23, 2024
Copy link

@Mergifyio backport branch-3.1

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the 3.1 label Sep 23, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 23, 2024

backport branch-3.3

✅ Backports have been created

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 23, 2024

backport branch-3.2

✅ Backports have been created

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 23, 2024

backport branch-3.1

✅ Backports have been created

mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 23, 2024
Fixes
```
2024-09-13 20:44:20.822+08:00 ERROR (ProcProfileCollector|72) [Daemon.run():109] daemon thread got exception. name: ProcProfileCollector
java.lang.NullPointerException: null
        at com.starrocks.memory.ProcProfileCollector.deleteExpiredFiles(ProcProfileCollector.java:178) ~[starrocks-fe.jar:?]
        at com.starrocks.memory.ProcProfileCollector.runAfterCatalogReady(ProcProfileCollector.java:75) ~[starrocks-fe.jar:?]
        at com.starrocks.common.util.FrontendDaemon.runOneCycle(FrontendDaemon.java:72) ~[starrocks-fe.jar:?]
        at com.starrocks.common.util.Daemon.run(Daemon.java:107) ~[starrocks-fe.jar:?]
```

Signed-off-by: gengjun-git <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 598c81c)
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 23, 2024
Fixes
```
2024-09-13 20:44:20.822+08:00 ERROR (ProcProfileCollector|72) [Daemon.run():109] daemon thread got exception. name: ProcProfileCollector
java.lang.NullPointerException: null
        at com.starrocks.memory.ProcProfileCollector.deleteExpiredFiles(ProcProfileCollector.java:178) ~[starrocks-fe.jar:?]
        at com.starrocks.memory.ProcProfileCollector.runAfterCatalogReady(ProcProfileCollector.java:75) ~[starrocks-fe.jar:?]
        at com.starrocks.common.util.FrontendDaemon.runOneCycle(FrontendDaemon.java:72) ~[starrocks-fe.jar:?]
        at com.starrocks.common.util.Daemon.run(Daemon.java:107) ~[starrocks-fe.jar:?]
```

Signed-off-by: gengjun-git <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 598c81c)
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 23, 2024
Fixes
```
2024-09-13 20:44:20.822+08:00 ERROR (ProcProfileCollector|72) [Daemon.run():109] daemon thread got exception. name: ProcProfileCollector
java.lang.NullPointerException: null
        at com.starrocks.memory.ProcProfileCollector.deleteExpiredFiles(ProcProfileCollector.java:178) ~[starrocks-fe.jar:?]
        at com.starrocks.memory.ProcProfileCollector.runAfterCatalogReady(ProcProfileCollector.java:75) ~[starrocks-fe.jar:?]
        at com.starrocks.common.util.FrontendDaemon.runOneCycle(FrontendDaemon.java:72) ~[starrocks-fe.jar:?]
        at com.starrocks.common.util.Daemon.run(Daemon.java:107) ~[starrocks-fe.jar:?]
```

Signed-off-by: gengjun-git <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 598c81c)
renzhimin7 pushed a commit to renzhimin7/starrocks that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2024
…cks#51027)

Fixes
```
2024-09-13 20:44:20.822+08:00 ERROR (ProcProfileCollector|72) [Daemon.run():109] daemon thread got exception. name: ProcProfileCollector
java.lang.NullPointerException: null
        at com.starrocks.memory.ProcProfileCollector.deleteExpiredFiles(ProcProfileCollector.java:178) ~[starrocks-fe.jar:?]
        at com.starrocks.memory.ProcProfileCollector.runAfterCatalogReady(ProcProfileCollector.java:75) ~[starrocks-fe.jar:?]
        at com.starrocks.common.util.FrontendDaemon.runOneCycle(FrontendDaemon.java:72) ~[starrocks-fe.jar:?]
        at com.starrocks.common.util.Daemon.run(Daemon.java:107) ~[starrocks-fe.jar:?]
```

Signed-off-by: gengjun-git <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: zhiminr.ren <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants