[Enhancement] subfield pushdown through table function

[satanson]

Why I'm doing:

Clone multiple duplicates of entire complex objects like struct instead of its required output subfield in TableFunction Operator is time consuming. so we must support subfield pushdown through table function.

for the query I mentioned in the UT test, this optimization performs well

1. concurrency=1, speed up 1.799/0.369=4.8X
2. concurrency=10, speed up 10.172/1.610=6.3X

What I'm doing:

Fixes #issue

What type of PR is this:

• BugFix
• Feature
• Enhancement
• Refactor
• UT
• Doc
• Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

• Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
• No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

• Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
• Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
• Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
• Feature removed
• Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

• I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
• This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
  • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
• This is a backport pr

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

• I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto-backported to the target branch
  • 3.4
  • 3.3
  • 3.2
  • 3.1
  • 3.0

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
5 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[github-actions]

[Java-Extensions Incremental Coverage Report]

✅ pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

[github-actions]

[FE Incremental Coverage Report]

❌ fail : 0 / 1 (00.00%)

file detail

	path	covered_line	new_line	coverage	not_covered_line_detail
🔵	com/starrocks/sql/optimizer/LogicalPlanPrinter.java	0	1	00.00%	[180]

[github-actions]

[BE Incremental Coverage Report]

✅ pass : 0 / 0 (0%)