-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release 4.0.16 update #5962
Release 4.0.16 update #5962
Conversation
… director for all required vars (#5088) [TT-2301] Create scope local variables for director for all required vars (#5088) <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> ## Description Fix logger according to scope; Add scope local variables for director to use, avoiding unexpected behaviour/races. <!-- Describe your changes in detail --> ## Related Issue <!-- This project only accepts pull requests related to open issues. --> <!-- If suggesting a new feature or change, please discuss it in an issue first. --> <!-- If fixing a bug, there should be an issue describing it with steps to reproduce. --> <!-- OSS: Please link to the issue here. Tyk: please create/link the JIRA ticket. --> Fixes #2980 #2952 https://tyktech.atlassian.net/browse/TT-2301 ## Motivation and Context <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? --> ## How This Has Been Tested <!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes --> <!-- Include details of your testing environment, and the tests --> <!-- you ran to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. --> <!-- This information is helpful for reviewers and QA. --> ## Screenshots (if appropriate) ## Types of changes <!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply: --> - [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change) - [ ] Refactoring or add test (improvements in base code or adds test coverage to functionality) ## Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply --> <!-- If there are no documentation updates required, mark the item as checked. --> <!-- Raise up any additional concerns not covered by the checklist. --> - [ ] I ensured that the documentation is up to date - [ ] I explained why this PR updates go.mod in detail with reasoning why it's required - [ ] I would like a code coverage CI quality gate exception and have explained why Co-authored-by: Tit Petric <[email protected]>
bump gw version <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> ## Description <!-- Describe your changes in detail --> ## Related Issue https://tyktech.atlassian.net/browse/TT-9187 <!-- This project only accepts pull requests related to open issues. --> <!-- If suggesting a new feature or change, please discuss it in an issue first. --> <!-- If fixing a bug, there should be an issue describing it with steps to reproduce. --> <!-- OSS: Please link to the issue here. Tyk: please create/link the JIRA ticket. --> ## Motivation and Context <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? --> ## How This Has Been Tested <!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes --> <!-- Include details of your testing environment, and the tests --> <!-- you ran to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. --> <!-- This information is helpful for reviewers and QA. --> ## Screenshots (if appropriate) ## Types of changes <!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply: --> - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change) - [ ] Refactoring or add test (improvements in base code or adds test coverage to functionality) ## Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply --> <!-- If there are no documentation updates required, mark the item as checked. --> <!-- Raise up any additional concerns not covered by the checklist. --> - [ ] I ensured that the documentation is up to date - [ ] I explained why this PR updates go.mod in detail with reasoning why it's required - [ ] I would like a code coverage CI quality gate exception and have explained why
…5168) <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> ## Description <!-- Describe your changes in detail --> This PR reverts commit 0e27df8 ## Related Issue <!-- This project only accepts pull requests related to open issues. --> <!-- If suggesting a new feature or change, please discuss it in an issue first. --> <!-- If fixing a bug, there should be an issue describing it with steps to reproduce. --> <!-- OSS: Please link to the issue here. Tyk: please create/link the JIRA ticket. --> https://tyktech.atlassian.net/browse/TT-9199 ## Motivation and Context <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? --> ## How This Has Been Tested <!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes --> <!-- Include details of your testing environment, and the tests --> <!-- you ran to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. --> <!-- This information is helpful for reviewers and QA. --> ## Screenshots (if appropriate) ## Types of changes <!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply: --> - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change) - [ ] Refactoring or add test (improvements in base code or adds test coverage to functionality) ## Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply --> <!-- If there are no documentation updates required, mark the item as checked. --> <!-- Raise up any additional concerns not covered by the checklist. --> - [ ] I ensured that the documentation is up to date - [ ] I explained why this PR updates go.mod in detail with reasoning why it's required - [ ] I would like a code coverage CI quality gate exception and have explained why --------- Co-authored-by: Tit Petric <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ilija Bojanovic <[email protected]>
Backport TT-9177 to 4.3.4 (#5153) <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> ## Description <!-- Describe your changes in detail --> ## Related Issue <!-- This project only accepts pull requests related to open issues. --> <!-- If suggesting a new feature or change, please discuss it in an issue first. --> <!-- If fixing a bug, there should be an issue describing it with steps to reproduce. --> <!-- OSS: Please link to the issue here. Tyk: please create/link the JIRA ticket. --> ## Motivation and Context <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? --> ## How This Has Been Tested <!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes --> <!-- Include details of your testing environment, and the tests --> <!-- you ran to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. --> <!-- This information is helpful for reviewers and QA. --> ## Screenshots (if appropriate) ## Types of changes <!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply: --> - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change) - [ ] Refactoring or add test (improvements in base code or adds test coverage to functionality) ## Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply --> <!-- If there are no documentation updates required, mark the item as checked. --> <!-- Raise up any additional concerns not covered by the checklist. --> - [ ] I ensured that the documentation is up to date - [ ] I explained why this PR updates go.mod in detail with reasoning why it's required - [ ] I would like a code coverage CI quality gate exception and have explained why --------- Co-authored-by: Zaid Albirawi <[email protected]> --------- Co-authored-by: Sredny M <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Matias <[email protected]>
Pin goreleaser to 1.18.2 Co-authored-by: Tit Petric <[email protected]>
Synchronizes github actions and goreleaser configs from 4-lts into 4.0.14 --------- Co-authored-by: Tit Petric <[email protected]>
<!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> ## Description Made the changes that were applied in master, release 5, and release-4-lts to keep consistency ## Related Issue https://tyktech.atlassian.net/browse/TT-9177 ## Motivation and Context <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? --> ## How This Has Been Tested Same as ticket description ## Screenshots (if appropriate) ## Types of changes <!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply: --> - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change) - [ ] Refactoring or add test (improvements in base code or adds test coverage to functionality) ## Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply --> <!-- If there are no documentation updates required, mark the item as checked. --> <!-- Raise up any additional concerns not covered by the checklist. --> - [ ] I ensured that the documentation is up to date - [ ] I explained why this PR updates go.mod in detail with reasoning why it's required - [ ] I would like a code coverage CI quality gate exception and have explained why
Picking CI changes from the commit d85facd
Picking CI changes from the commit d161d25
Picking CI changes from the commit 92404e6
Picking CI changes from the commit 5dc52ef
manual change: - verify github actions - copy over goreleaser - copy over plugin-compiler - copy over ci/Dockerfile.std/slim remaining changes should be automation changes (TD-1998 to track). --------- Co-authored-by: Tit Petric <[email protected]>
Update a failing test. Co-authored-by: Tit Petric <[email protected]>
https://tyktech.atlassian.net/browse/TT-9987 --------- Co-authored-by: Tit Petric <[email protected]>
…ss or nil pointer dereference (#5589) (#5594) [TT-7127] Fix goplugin invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference (#5589) https://tyktech.atlassian.net/browse/TT-7127 Closes #4198 #4197 Signed-off-by: Chenyang Yan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Chenyang Yan <[email protected]> [TT-7127]: https://tyktech.atlassian.net/browse/TT-7127?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ --------- Co-authored-by: Tit Petric <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Tit Petric <[email protected]>
…on stdlib in 3.11 (deprecated since python 3.0) (#5664) [TT-10329] fix getargspec removal from python stdlib in 3.11 (deprecated since python 3.0) (#5664) https://tyktech.atlassian.net/browse/TT-10329 --------- Co-authored-by: Tit Petric <[email protected]>
[TT-8547] Fix websocket error proxying (#4918) ## Description Upgrade websocket only when server responded with 101. Fixes the case when websocket have own authentification, so we can proxy this error. ## Motivation and Context <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? --> ## How This Has Been Tested <!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes --> <!-- Include details of your testing environment, and the tests --> <!-- you ran to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. --> <!-- This information is helpful for reviewers and QA. --> ## Screenshots (if appropriate) ## Types of changes <!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply: --> - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change) - [ ] Refactoring or add test (improvements in base code or adds test coverage to functionality) ## Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply --> <!-- If there are no documentation updates required, mark the item as checked. --> <!-- Raise up any additional concerns not covered by the checklist. --> - [ ] I ensured that the documentation is up to date - [ ] I explained why this PR updates go.mod in detail with reasoning why it's required - [ ] I would like a code coverage CI quality gate exception and have explained why
…ependency in CI (#5737) Co-authored-by: Tit Petric <[email protected]>
Mark legacy graphql test as flaky to pass CI https://tyktech.atlassian.net/browse/TT-10432 Co-authored-by: Tit Petric <[email protected]>
…efore handling any additional logic (#5345) (#5736) [TT-9327] Decoding the URL request first, before handling any additional logic (#5345) <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> this path works: /payment-intents but this path doesn't: /payment%2Dintents Encoded URLs aren't being rewritten when URL rewrite is applied. One edge case scenario that could break backwards compatibility (as described by @buger ), is that users can rely on escaped characters, and try to match them from the the url rewrite rules. In order to accomodate that, we are running url rewrite middleware twice: - once on the raw path - if transformations are failing and the url contains encoded characters, then we run it second time, with decoded URL <!-- Describe your changes in detail --> ## Related Issue <!-- This project only accepts pull requests related to open issues. --> <!-- If suggesting a new feature or change, please discuss it in an issue first. --> <!-- If fixing a bug, there should be an issue describing it with steps to reproduce. --> <!-- OSS: Please link to the issue here. Tyk: please create/link the JIRA ticket. --> ## Motivation and Context <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? --> ## How This Has Been Tested Unit test and manually ## Screenshots (if appropriate) ## Types of changes <!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply: --> - [√ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change) - [ ] Refactoring or add test (improvements in base code or adds test coverage to functionality) ## Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply --> <!-- If there are no documentation updates required, mark the item as checked. --> <!-- Raise up any additional concerns not covered by the checklist. --> - [ ] I ensured that the documentation is up to date - [ ] I explained why this PR updates go.mod in detail with reasoning why it's required - [ ] I would like a code coverage CI quality gate exception and have explained why [TT-9327]: https://tyktech.atlassian.net/browse/TT-9327?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ --------- Co-authored-by: Laurentiu Ghiur <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Tit Petric <[email protected]>
[TT-9761] Add reload interval (#5418) <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> Add ability to manage the reload interval to take the load off the gateway ## Description <!-- Describe your changes in detail --> ## Related Issue <!-- This project only accepts pull requests related to open issues. --> <!-- If suggesting a new feature or change, please discuss it in an issue first. --> <!-- If fixing a bug, there should be an issue describing it with steps to reproduce. --> <!-- OSS: Please link to the issue here. Tyk: please create/link the JIRA ticket. --> ## Motivation and Context <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? --> ## How This Has Been Tested <!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes --> <!-- Include details of your testing environment, and the tests --> <!-- you ran to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. --> <!-- This information is helpful for reviewers and QA. --> ## Screenshots (if appropriate) ## Types of changes <!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply: --> - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change) - [ ] Refactoring or add test (improvements in base code or adds test coverage to functionality) ## Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply --> <!-- If there are no documentation updates required, mark the item as checked. --> <!-- Raise up any additional concerns not covered by the checklist. --> - [ ] I ensured that the documentation is up to date - [ ] I explained why this PR updates go.mod in detail with reasoning why it's required - [ ] I would like a code coverage CI quality gate exception and have explained why --------- Co-authored-by: Tit Petric <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Tit Petric <[email protected]> [TT-9761]: https://tyktech.atlassian.net/browse/TT-9761?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ --------- Co-authored-by: Zaid Albirawi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Tit Petric <[email protected]>
…ose idle connections (#5231) (#5741) [TT-9284] Ensure that old transport will close idle connections (#5231) <details open> <br /> <table> <tr> <th>Summary</th> <td>[CS] The gateway leaks file handles via sockets when max_conn_time is above 0</td> </tr> <tr> <th>Type</th> <td> <img alt="Bug" src="https://tyktech.atlassian.net/rest/api/2/universal_avatar/view/type/issuetype/avatar/10303?size=medium" /> Bug </td> </tr> <tr> <th>Status</th> <td>In Code Review</td> </tr> <tr> <th>Points</th> <td>N/A</td> </tr> </table> </details> <!-- do not remove this marker as it will break jira-lint's functionality. added_by_jira_lint --> --- TBD ## Description <!-- Describe your changes in detail --> ## Related Issue <!-- This project only accepts pull requests related to open issues. --> <!-- If suggesting a new feature or change, please discuss it in an issue first. --> <!-- If fixing a bug, there should be an issue describing it with steps to reproduce. --> <!-- OSS: Please link to the issue here. Tyk: please create/link the JIRA ticket. --> ## Motivation and Context <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? --> ## How This Has Been Tested <!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes --> <!-- Include details of your testing environment, and the tests --> <!-- you ran to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. --> <!-- This information is helpful for reviewers and QA. --> ## Screenshots (if appropriate) ## Types of changes <!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply: --> - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change) - [ ] Refactoring or add test (improvements in base code or adds test coverage to functionality) ## Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply --> <!-- If there are no documentation updates required, mark the item as checked. --> <!-- Raise up any additional concerns not covered by the checklist. --> - [ ] I ensured that the documentation is up to date - [ ] I explained why this PR updates go.mod in detail with reasoning why it's required - [ ] I would like a code coverage CI quality gate exception and have explained why --------- Co-authored-by: Tit Petric <[email protected]> [TT-9284]: https://tyktech.atlassian.net/browse/TT-9284?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ --------- Co-authored-by: Tit Petric <[email protected]>
…outeHandler (#5482) (#5733) [TT-9924]remove muxer, proxy from explicitRouteHandler (#5482) Remove muxer from explicitRouteHandler [TT-9924]: https://tyktech.atlassian.net/browse/TT-9924?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ --------- Co-authored-by: Jeffy Mathew <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Tit Petric <[email protected]>
TT-8942 Change default RPC pool size (#5030) <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> ## Description Default RPC pool size is set to 20 and because of the relatively heavy CPU and Memory footprint of the RPC connections in the MDCB model this can cause issues where either the gateways or MDCB fail on load cause by scaling events or component failure at MDCB side. <!-- Describe your changes in detail --> ## Related Issue <!-- This project only accepts pull requests related to open issues. --> <!-- If suggesting a new feature or change, please discuss it in an issue first. --> <!-- If fixing a bug, there should be an issue describing it with steps to reproduce. --> <!-- OSS: Please link to the issue here. Tyk: please create/link the JIRA ticket. --> https://tyktech.atlassian.net/browse/TT-8942 ## Motivation and Context <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? --> https://tyktech.atlassian.net/browse/TT-8942 ## How This Has Been Tested <!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes --> <!-- Include details of your testing environment, and the tests --> <!-- you ran to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. --> <!-- This information is helpful for reviewers and QA. --> ## Screenshots (if appropriate) ## Types of changes <!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply: --> - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change) - [ ] Refactoring or add test (improvements in base code or adds test coverage to functionality) ## Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply --> <!-- If there are no documentation updates required, mark the item as checked. --> <!-- Raise up any additional concerns not covered by the checklist. --> - [ ] I ensured that the documentation is up to date - [ ] I explained why this PR updates go.mod in detail with reasoning why it's required - [ ] I would like a code coverage CI quality gate exception and have explained why
…) (#5746) TT-8934 Fix chunked response analytics (#5495) <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> ## Description <!-- Describe your changes in detail --> When transfer-encoding is chunked on the upstream response, analytics records raw responses also contain the chunked characters (example https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Transfer-Encoding#examples). This is not expected. The proposed solution is to delete the transfer-encoding header before reading and writing the response body to the rawResponse field. Without this header, Go will process the header as it should. ## Related Issue <!-- This project only accepts pull requests related to open issues. --> <!-- If suggesting a new feature or change, please discuss it in an issue first. --> <!-- If fixing a bug, there should be an issue describing it with steps to reproduce. --> <!-- OSS: Please link to the issue here. Tyk: please create/link the JIRA ticket. --> https://tyktech.atlassian.net/browse/TT-8934 ## Motivation and Context <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? --> https://tyktech.atlassian.net/browse/TT-8934 ## How This Has Been Tested <!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes --> <!-- Include details of your testing environment, and the tests --> <!-- you ran to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. --> <!-- This information is helpful for reviewers and QA. --> Added tests ## Screenshots (if appropriate) ## Types of changes <!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply: --> - [X] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change) - [ ] Refactoring or add test (improvements in base code or adds test coverage to functionality) ## Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply --> <!-- If there are no documentation updates required, mark the item as checked. --> <!-- Raise up any additional concerns not covered by the checklist. --> - [ ] I ensured that the documentation is up to date - [ ] I explained why this PR updates go.mod in detail with reasoning why it's required - [ ] I would like a code coverage CI quality gate exception and have explained why --------- Co-authored-by: Tomas Buchaillot <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Tit Petric <[email protected]>
…poses key in the log (#5080) [TT-926] fix security vulnerability that exposes key in the log (#5080) <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> ## Description The problem involved the HashKey function in [storage.go](https://github.com/TykTechnologies/tyk/blob/76a00611f33e150b1b6145264909baeefa1cbd4f/storage/storage.go#L170). It returns the key without hashing if "hash_keys" is set to false in the tyk.conf file. Now a conditional has been added that obfuscates the key if "hash_keys" and "enable_key_logging" are set to false. ## Related Issue [View issue here](https://tyktech.atlassian.net/browse/TT-926) ## Motivation and Context This issue is a low level security vulnerability. ## How This Has Been Tested <!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes --> <!-- Include details of your testing environment, and the tests --> <!-- you ran to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. --> <!-- This information is helpful for reviewers and QA. --> ## Screenshots (if appropriate) ## Types of changes <!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply: --> - [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) ## Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply --> <!-- If there are no documentation updates required, mark the item as checked. --> <!-- Raise up any additional concerns not covered by the checklist. --> - [ ] I ensured that the documentation is up to date - [ ] I explained why this PR updates go.mod in detail with reasoning why it's required - [ ] I would like a code coverage CI quality gate exception and have explained why
Resolving merge conflicts: track the progress here.I'm currently resolving the merge conflicts in this PR. I will stack a new PR once I'm done.
An error has occurred: Cmd('git') failed due to: exit code(1) |
Fixing PR: track the progress here.I'm currently fixing this PR to address the following: [Sweep GHA Fix] The GitHub Actions run failed with the following error logs:
An error has occurred: Message is too long, max tokens is -212582 (tracking ID: ff891db782) |
API tests result: failure 🚫 TT-10329 fix getargspec removal from python stdlib in 3.11 (deprecated since python 3.0) (#5664) https://tyktech.atlassian.net/browse/TT-10329 Co-authored-by: Tit Petric [email protected] |
Removed bitrot
API tests result: success ✅ |
API tests result: failure 🚫 Removed bitrot |
API tests result: failure 🚫 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem pushing to CI which was non-critical but I've fixed anyway so that ECR has updated images. I can only confirm the releng code and the other code is best reviewed by someone who knows what is going on.
API tests result: failure 🚫 |
API tests result: failure 🚫 Merging to release-4.3.8: TT-9964 Prevent new idle connections to be generated. (#5526) TT-9964 Prevent new idle connections to be generated. (#5526) |
API tests result: success ✅ |
API tests result: failure 🚫 |
API tests result: failure 🚫 |
API tests result: failure 🚫 |
API tests result: success ✅ |
API tests result: failure 🚫 |
1 similar comment
API tests result: failure 🚫 |
API tests result: success ✅ |
API tests result: failure 🚫 |
API tests result: success ✅ Co-authored-by: Leonid Bugaev [email protected] |
API tests result: failure 🚫 Co-authored-by: Leonid Bugaev [email protected] |
No description provided.