Auto generated from templates by gromit

[konrad-sol]

User description

Description

Related Issue

Motivation and Context

How This Has Been Tested

Screenshots (if appropriate)

Types of changes

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• Refactoring or add test (improvements in base code or adds test coverage to functionality)

Checklist

• I ensured that the documentation is up to date
• I explained why this PR updates go.mod in detail with reasoning why it's required
• I would like a code coverage CI quality gate exception and have explained why

---

PR Type

enhancement, configuration changes

---

Description

• Commented out the concurrency section in the release workflow to potentially address issues with concurrent runs.
• Updated step IDs for Docker metadata actions to ensure consistency and avoid conflicts.
• Introduced a new step to dynamically choose the test code branch based on the GitHub event type (release, pull request, or push).
• Removed steps related to uploading Playwright Test Reports to S3 and sharing the report link, possibly to streamline the workflow or due to changes in reporting strategy.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Enhancement	release.yml Update release workflow with new branch handling and metadata steps .github/workflows/release.yml Commented out the concurrency section. Updated various step IDs for metadata actions. Added a new step for choosing the test code branch based on the event type. Removed steps for uploading Playwright Test Report to S3 and sharing the report link. +46/-30

---

💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

[buger]

A JIRA Issue ID is missing from your branch name, PR title and PR description! 🦄

Your branch: releng/master

Your PR title: Auto generated from templates by gromit

Your PR description:

Description

Related Issue

Motivation and Context

How This Has Been Tested

Screenshots (if appropriate)

Types of changes

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• Refactoring or add test (improvements in base code or adds test coverage to functionality)

Checklist

• I ensured that the documentation is up to date
• I explained why this PR updates go.mod in detail with reasoning why it's required
• I would like a code coverage CI quality gate exception and have explained why

If this is your first time contributing to this repository - welcome!

---

Please refer to jira-lint to get started.

Without the JIRA Issue ID in your branch name you would lose out on automatic updates to JIRA via SCM; some GitHub status checks might fail.

Valid sample branch names:

‣ feature/shiny-new-feature--mojo-10'
‣ 'chore/changelogUpdate_mojo-123'
‣ 'bugfix/fix-some-strange-bug_GAL-2345'

[github-actions]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 3 🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Concurrency Handling The concurrency section has been commented out. This change might lead to issues with concurrent runs not being handled as expected, potentially causing conflicts or resource contention. ID Consistency Updated step IDs for Docker metadata actions to ensure consistency. This change is crucial to avoid conflicts but should be thoroughly tested to ensure that it does not affect the expected workflow behavior. Dynamic Branch Selection Introduced a new step to dynamically choose the test code branch based on the GitHub event type. This addition is significant and should be reviewed for correctness in branch selection logic to prevent potential errors in test execution.

[github-actions]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

No code suggestions found for the PR.

[github-actions]

API Changes

no api changes detected

[titpetric]

Halleluyah 🏆

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
0.0% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud