Can edit pages from MkDocs rendered site, thanks @bclaremar

data/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+# Data
+
+Data being collected during the course.

reflections/2024_autumn/20241122_richel.md

@@ -67,3 +67,81 @@ I think the project should be worked on more and be simplified.
 Maybe start with a proper/pre-fab requirements list.
 Branch of from the main function more.
 
+## Evaluation results
+
+### What did Richel do well?
+
+- I think Richèl carry this course. He explained well his lectures and give very good exercises. He asked good questions that challenges our thinking. He seems very prepare everyday and always there to help. Additionally, he listens to comments and give really good insight. 
+- Involving everyone with the discussions
+- Explain everything super well and be very positive about everything
+- Really great engagement and explanations. Calling people out for discussion greatly improved flow. Really felt like his heart was in the course.
+
+### What could Richèl Improve
+
+- He is really good already. Just continue it. 
+- Clearer exercises. This became clearer as the course went along
+- Remake the video that was in one of the days that lagged
+- Tbh I'm really not finding anything.
+
+Uhhh, are they too friendly? Let's compare:
+
+### What did Björn do well
+
+- I like his lecture in git and giving nice exercise on that. 
+- Clear theory parts on the subjects
+- Explain very vague concepts in an understandable way
+- Good help during the exercises.
+
+### What could Björn Improve
+
+- I think next time avoid just reading the page. Simplify things and asks questions and encourage student to answer.
+- Clearer exercises
+- When asking questions, make them more specific so that people are more apt to answer
+- Was at points difficult to follow the lectures, because he just read the course material out loud. Could benefit from a more free style of lecturing! 
+
+### What did Lars do well
+
+- Lars really give good insight most of the time while in lecture or even in the side. 
+- Giving helpful tips when needed
+- Give a lot of extra knowledge that was not always in the website
+- Great knowledge, really helpful. 
+
+###  What could Lars Improve
+
+- I think the exercises, maybe make it more understandable and assess the time needed to accomplish it. Also, there is a room for improvement in the lecture. 
+- Clearer exercises
+- Give a lot more real-life practical examples when explaining concepts, that would help a lot
+- Feel like it would be great to see him do a pair-programming exercise together with another lecturer. Got the impression that he's someone who can showcase how to be a navigator.
+
+Ah, the learners can indeed be critical. Let's go back to mine:
+
+### Again: What did Richel do well?
+
+- I think Richèl carry this course. 
+  He explained well his lectures and give very good exercises. 
+  He asked good questions that challenges our thinking. 
+  He seems very prepare everyday and always there to help. 
+  Additionally, he listens to comments and give really good insight
+- Involving everyone with the discussions
+- Explain everything super well and be very positive about everything
+- Really great engagement and explanations.
+  Calling people out for discussion greatly improved flow.
+  Really felt like his heart was in the course.
+
+That is some heartwarming feedback.
+
+I am happy to read I came across as prepared, even though it was a
+wild ride to do so. I am happy that this group does enjoy to be called
+out.
+
+### Again: What could Richèl Improve
+
+- He is really good already. Just continue it. 
+- Clearer exercises. This became clearer as the course went along
+- Remake the video that was in one of the days that lagged
+- Tbh I'm really not finding anything.
+
+I am happy to learn my exercises improved!
+And indeed, the lagging video is on my todo list :-)
+
+