-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adds new flows and expands ReCiPe mapping #210
Conversation
ecoinvent do that in their mapping
…nd/shrubland, respectively This is inspired by what ecoinvent does.
There's more ecoinvent CFs for this flow than FEDEFL ones. (Ecosystem damage ozone formation and Human damage ozone formation). This is easily corrected once we expand the recipe flow nitrogen oxides (as nitrogen dioxide) to Nitrogen Oxides . (Currently it is being expanded to nitrogen dioxide only). This commit does that.
Ecoinvent has a flowable named glufosinate which gets its CFs from the recipe flowable glufosinate-ammonium. FEDEFL's Glufosinate gets its CFs from nowhere, but I think we could expand recipe glufosinate-ammonium to glufosinate as ecoinvent does. This commit does that.
Ecoinvent flowable fenoxaprop-p-ethyl ester gets CFs from recipe fenoxaprop-ethyl. We could maybe do the same and expand fenoxaprop-ethyl eas a proxy to fenoxaprop-p-ethyl.
Recipe Vanadium(V) is currently being mapped to elemental Vanadium only. This expansion is a direct match (recipe V(V) to fedefl Vanadium(V)
Add 'Aldehydes, unspecified' as flowable
Add beta-cyfluthrin as target for cyfluthrin
expand recipe glufosinate-ammonium to FEDEFL glufosinate
expanding recipe nitrogen oxides (as nitrogen dioxide) to fedefl nitrogen oxides
Added proxies to emissions of elementary metals
expand recipe fenoxaprop-ethyl to fedefl fenoxaprop-p-ethyl
pasture and managed forest as proxies for land use grassland/shrubland
expand recipe vanadium(v) to fedefl vanadium(v)
recipe2016: direct expansions for Ba(II), Be(II) and Tin(II)
new flowables and primary contexts from ecoinvent3.10
added external link to new toxic organics.
replicates 3d3a4eb
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bl-young I am not sure I understand this addition. If you look at the top 8 rows (for example) I understand why Ag (I) air/rural is being mapped to multiple FEDEFL contexts. But why is Ag (I) also being mapped to multiple target flows (Silver (I) and Silver)?
This was added in #167, which has some discussion there. These LCIA mappings are reversed, in that we can have two flows map to the same CF, if desired. In this case, we are saying that both |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks good apart from specific comments.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
edits in this file look good.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I approve.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
approve
"1-(6-tert-butyl-1,1-dimethyl-2,3-dihydroinden-4-yl)ethanone",Emission,Water | ||
2-(4-chlorophenoxy)-2-methylpropanoic acid,Emission,Water | ||
2-(4-chlorophenoxy)-2-methylpropanoic acid,Emission,Ground | ||
"2,2-dichloroacetaldehyde",Emission,Water |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bl-young I notice that quotations are used inconsistently around flowable and synonym names. Presumably both work... Is one preferred?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if there are commas within terms it will automatically add quotation marks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
approve
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
approve
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
approve
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
approve
"Actinides, unspecified",kBq,=,"Actinides, unspecified",kBq,Hottle,Manual,,,4/6/2020 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure why this row is showing as an edit? compare to row above.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
a blank line was missing in the prior version (which is why it shows the red mark there and makes it appear like a change
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
one comment below. otherwise approve.
No description provided.