Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adds new flows and expands ReCiPe mapping #210

Merged
merged 35 commits into from
Dec 6, 2024
Merged

Adds new flows and expands ReCiPe mapping #210

merged 35 commits into from
Dec 6, 2024

Conversation

bl-young
Copy link
Collaborator

@bl-young bl-young commented Dec 4, 2024

No description provided.

fchichorro and others added 30 commits June 20, 2023 09:30
ecoinvent do that in their mapping
…nd/shrubland, respectively

This is inspired by what ecoinvent does.
There's more ecoinvent CFs for this flow than FEDEFL ones. (Ecosystem damage ozone formation and Human damage ozone formation). This is easily corrected once we expand the recipe flow nitrogen oxides (as nitrogen dioxide) to Nitrogen Oxides . (Currently it is being expanded to nitrogen dioxide only). This commit does that.
Ecoinvent has a flowable named glufosinate which gets its CFs from the recipe flowable glufosinate-ammonium. FEDEFL's Glufosinate gets its CFs from nowhere, but I think we could expand recipe glufosinate-ammonium to glufosinate as ecoinvent does. This commit does that.
Ecoinvent flowable fenoxaprop-p-ethyl ester gets CFs from recipe fenoxaprop-ethyl. We could maybe do the same and expand fenoxaprop-ethyl eas a proxy to fenoxaprop-p-ethyl.
Recipe Vanadium(V) is currently being mapped to elemental Vanadium only. This expansion is a direct match (recipe V(V) to fedefl Vanadium(V)
Add 'Aldehydes, unspecified' as flowable
Add beta-cyfluthrin as target for cyfluthrin
expand recipe glufosinate-ammonium to FEDEFL glufosinate
expanding recipe nitrogen oxides (as nitrogen dioxide) to fedefl nitrogen oxides
Added proxies to emissions of elementary metals
expand recipe fenoxaprop-ethyl to fedefl fenoxaprop-p-ethyl
pasture and managed forest as proxies for land use grassland/shrubland
expand recipe vanadium(v) to fedefl vanadium(v)
recipe2016: direct expansions for Ba(II), Be(II) and Tin(II)
new flowables and primary contexts from ecoinvent3.10
added external link to new toxic organics.
@bl-young bl-young added this to the v1.3.0 milestone Dec 4, 2024
@bl-young bl-young requested a review from bnjmnmorelli December 4, 2024 22:32
bnjmnmorelli

This comment was marked as off-topic.

Copy link
Collaborator

@bnjmnmorelli bnjmnmorelli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bl-young I am not sure I understand this addition. If you look at the top 8 rows (for example) I understand why Ag (I) air/rural is being mapped to multiple FEDEFL contexts. But why is Ag (I) also being mapped to multiple target flows (Silver (I) and Silver)?

@bl-young
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bl-young commented Dec 5, 2024

@bl-young I am not sure I understand this addition. If you look at the top 8 rows (for example) I understand why Ag (I) air/rural is being mapped to multiple FEDEFL contexts. But why is Ag (I) also being mapped to multiple target flows (Silver (I) and Silver)?

This was added in #167, which has some discussion there. These LCIA mappings are reversed, in that we can have two flows map to the same CF, if desired. In this case, we are saying that both Silver and Silver(I) should use the ReCiPe CF denoted by Ag(I). Otherwise, as it stands prior to this change, emissions of silver to air are not characterized.

Copy link
Collaborator

@bnjmnmorelli bnjmnmorelli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good apart from specific comments.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

edits in this file look good.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I approve.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approve

"1-(6-tert-butyl-1,1-dimethyl-2,3-dihydroinden-4-yl)ethanone",Emission,Water
2-(4-chlorophenoxy)-2-methylpropanoic acid,Emission,Water
2-(4-chlorophenoxy)-2-methylpropanoic acid,Emission,Ground
"2,2-dichloroacetaldehyde",Emission,Water
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bl-young I notice that quotations are used inconsistently around flowable and synonym names. Presumably both work... Is one preferred?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if there are commas within terms it will automatically add quotation marks

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approve

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approve

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approve

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approve

"Actinides, unspecified",kBq,=,"Actinides, unspecified",kBq,Hottle,Manual,,,4/6/2020
Copy link
Collaborator

@bnjmnmorelli bnjmnmorelli Dec 5, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure why this row is showing as an edit? compare to row above.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

a blank line was missing in the prior version (which is why it shows the red mark there and makes it appear like a change

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

one comment below. otherwise approve.

@bl-young bl-young marked this pull request as ready for review December 6, 2024 02:25
@bl-young bl-young merged commit 9c6a0a7 into develop Dec 6, 2024
18 checks passed
@bl-young bl-young deleted the flow_updates branch December 6, 2024 02:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants