Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename Axiom L to Preunivalence #866

Merged
merged 97 commits into from
Oct 20, 2023

Conversation

fredrik-bakke
Copy link
Collaborator

@fredrik-bakke fredrik-bakke commented Oct 20, 2023

Also tries out some new names for the statements of the axioms of univalence, K, and, well, L.

@fredrik-bakke fredrik-bakke marked this pull request as ready for review October 20, 2023 13:33
@fredrik-bakke
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This PR is quite self-contained in its current state, so I'll just mark it as ready for review immediately :)

@fredrik-bakke fredrik-bakke changed the title Preunivalence Rename Axiom L to Preunivalence Oct 20, 2023
@EgbertRijke
Copy link
Collaborator

Great!

@fredrik-bakke
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Sorry, I went for a quick coffee and then I was ambushed by some colleagues. I'm back now though :)

@fredrik-bakke
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Done :)

@EgbertRijke
Copy link
Collaborator

I'm really happy with how this one came out. Thank you so much for taking the initiative on this!

@EgbertRijke EgbertRijke merged commit 408b238 into UniMath:master Oct 20, 2023
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ In this file we postulate the univalence axiom. Its statement is defined in
## Postulate

```agda
postulate univalence : {l : Level} (A B : UU l) → UNIVALENCE A B
postulate univalence : {l : Level} → axiom-univalence-Level l
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a particular reason why this isn't postulate univalence : axiom-univalence?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch! It should be judgmentally equal.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The particular reason is that I didn't catch it, since you're wondering

@fredrik-bakke fredrik-bakke deleted the preunivalence branch October 20, 2023 21:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants