Filled in missing EU addresses

[AnonymousRandomPerson]

With EU support in the decomp (pret/pmd-sky#36), it is now possible to precisely identify the address of any NA/EU symbol when given an address in the other game version. I updated the syncing script within the decomp project to fill in any missing addresses between EU/NA (mostly EU). There were a handful of cases where EU and NA were pointing to different symbols, which I also ironed out.

For data lengths, I simply copied over the NA length to the EU length. It is not feasible to determine the length of a symbol automatically with just the ASM, and there are too many to inspect all of them manually. If the assumption of equal NA/EU lengths is undesirable, I can remove all of the newly added length entries instead.

I noticed that GUMMI_IQ_STRING_IDS and GUMMI_LIKE_STRING_IDS in overlay 29 are set to the same address. The data at this address has a size of 8, which leans towards GUMMI_LIKE_STRING_IDS being the correct entry. I'm not familiar enough with message IDs to quickly find the correct GUMMI_IQ_STRING_IDS, so I left both of them as duplicates for now when adding the EU address.

[UsernameFodder]

For data lengths, I simply copied over the NA length to the EU length. It is not feasible to determine the length of a symbol automatically with just the ASM, and there are too many to inspect all of them manually. If the assumption of equal NA/EU lengths is undesirable, I can remove all of the newly added length entries instead.

Yeah this is undesirable. It's not foolproof enough that I wouldn't want it to be automated.

I noticed that GUMMI_IQ_STRING_IDS and GUMMI_LIKE_STRING_IDS in overlay 29 are set to the same address. The data at this address has a size of 8, which leans towards GUMMI_LIKE_STRING_IDS being the correct entry. I'm not familiar enough with message IDs to quickly find the correct GUMMI_IQ_STRING_IDS, so I left both of them as duplicates for now when adding the EU address.

Can you file a bug?

[AnonymousRandomPerson]

Can you file a bug?

#214

[AnonymousRandomPerson]

Yeah this is undesirable. It's not foolproof enough that I wouldn't want it to be automated.

Removed.