Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[VEN-2741]: Bridge configurations on zksync mainnet #362

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 30, 2024
Merged

Conversation

GitGuru7
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Resolves VEN

@GitGuru7 GitGuru7 self-assigned this Aug 23, 2024
@GitGuru7 GitGuru7 changed the base branch from main to vip/VEN-2739 August 23, 2024 09:54
@chechu
Copy link
Member

chechu commented Aug 25, 2024

We could add to the same PR the TX (and VIP for bscmainnet) to be executed on the remote networks to configure the trustworthiness relationship with zkSync

@GitGuru7 GitGuru7 changed the base branch from vip/VEN-2739 to main August 27, 2024 05:25
signature: "setMintCap(address,uint256)",
params: [XVS_BRIDGE_DEST, XVS_MINT_LIMIT],
},
]);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't we have to configure the limits between zkSync and the rest of the networks? I think we have to invoke the following functions on the XVS_BRIDGE_ADMIN_PROXY, for each network:

  • setMaxDailyLimit(uint16,uint256)
  • setMaxSingleTransactionLimit(uint16,uint256)
  • setMaxDailyReceiveLimit(uint16,uint256)
  • setMaxSingleReceiveTransactionLimit(uint16,uint256)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see these functions were invoked during the deployment. Ignore this comment

@chechu
Copy link
Member

chechu commented Aug 29, 2024

@GitGuru7 GitGuru7 merged commit 397f850 into main Aug 30, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants