-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update README.md to use coordinator #350
Conversation
I don't think Coordinator accurately describes all of these roles, so I'm hesitant to change them all here. We can take a look at the descriptions and responsibilities and see if there is a different term that fits. @abbeyperini have other ppl given feedback that it's confusing? |
@meg-gutshall brought up leader vs lead in our meeting today and I noticed my role is already coordinator |
I would agree with @BekahHW - I don't see the coordinator and lead as necessarily equivalent (though they might be in some cases). As I see it, a coordinator coordinates work whereas a lead does that and leads a team. Where we have a team of people (or aspire to have), lead seems more appropriate. To avoid confusion, could we always use full terms such as "team lead" or "room leader" instead of "lead"/"leader" on their own in the documentation? Another option would be to keep the title "team lead" but also maintain a list of "coordinators" (who might be the "team lead" in their team) where it makes things clearer. |
I agree with @BekahHW & @dominicduffin1 here. Dominic's explanation about "lead" and "coordinator" is what I have in mind as well. |
This came out of a conversation between myself, Abbey, and Kirk on Monday. I'll add some thoughts this weekend. |
I guess the most critical thing here is avoiding ambiguity. I'm okay with keeping keeping lead, if we have a way of making it clear between the person who "leads" a zoom session of a group, vs the person who "leads" the coordination of a group or team. Host is another word that has multiple meanings. Part of this discussion came up when we realised that the person who is point of contact for a coffee table group and the person coordinating a session are very often not the same. We're thinking of some standard training for anyone who wants to volunteer in the "running a zoom call" role, and that's where it'd be nice if there were a word to describe that. So "room/zoom lead", "leader", "host", could all be that, it'd just be good if the name was specific and didn't overlap with other role types. |
I think this warrants a broader discussion. I created a new discussion post here for us to work it out. |
Lead vs leaders is confusing, so let's call leads coordinators