Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: try to fix tests on 22 #341

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

ci: try to fix tests on 22 #341

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

TobiTenno
Copy link
Member

@TobiTenno TobiTenno commented Nov 5, 2024

Summary

sine weird errors on tests


Resolves issue
closes #


Screenshots/examples

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new debug method in the WorldstateEmitter class for enhanced introspection of RSS feed items, worldstate, and Twitter data.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated import syntax for JSON resources in the RSS and Twitter handlers to improve data processing.
  • Chores

    • Modified package.json to update the main entry point, scripts, and dependency versions for better project management.
  • Tests

    • Updated test files to use the expect assertion style for improved readability and consistency.

@TobiTenno TobiTenno requested a review from a team as a code owner November 5, 2024 14:08
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 5, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@TobiTenno has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 2 minutes and 31 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3dd1fa8 and 9320476.

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to several JavaScript files primarily related to import statements and testing syntax. The handlers/RSS.js and handlers/Twitter.js files have updated their import syntax for JSON resources. The index.js file introduces a new getter method in the WorldstateEmitter class. The package.json file has been updated to include a new entry point, modified scripts, and a dependency version change. Additionally, two test files have altered their assertion styles and import paths.

Changes

File Change Summary
handlers/RSS.js Changed import syntax for feeds from assert { type: 'json' } to with { type: 'json' }.
handlers/Twitter.js Changed import syntax for toWatch from assert { type: 'json' } to with { type: 'json' }.
index.js Added new getter method debug in WorldstateEmitter class.
package.json Added exports field, modified prepare script, added validate script, and updated chai dependency version.
test/specs/access.spec.js Updated Chai import to use expect, changed assertions to expect style, and modified function declarations.
test/specs/emitter.spec.js Updated Chai import to use should, changed import path for WSEmitter, and maintained assertion logic.

Poem

In code we dance, with changes bright,
From assert to with, a new delight.
With debug now, we see it clear,
Our tests are strong, we hold them dear.
A rabbit's hop, through lines we weave,
In every change, new paths we cleave! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
test/specs/emitter.spec.js (1)

Line range hint 8-20: Consider adding more test cases for comprehensive coverage.

While the current test verifies basic functionality, consider adding:

  • Error cases (e.g., malformed tweet data)
  • Edge cases (e.g., multiple tweets, missing properties)
  • Event unsubscription tests

Example test cases to add:

it('should handle malformed tweet data gracefully', (done) => {
  ws.on('tweet', (d) => {
    d.should.be.an('object');
    d.should.have.property('eventKey');
    done();
  });
  ws.emit('tweet', { eventKey: 'twitter.retweet.tobitenno' }); // missing tweets
});

it('should allow event unsubscription', () => {
  const handler = () => {};
  ws.on('tweet', handler);
  ws.off('tweet', handler);
  // Verify handler is removed
});
test/specs/access.spec.js (1)

Line range hint 6-46: Consider adding negative test cases.

While the positive test case for object structure is comprehensive, consider adding negative test cases to verify error handling when the worldstate is unavailable or invalid.

Example addition:

it('should handle errors when worldstate is unavailable', async () => {
  // Temporarily break the worldstate
  ws.forceError = true;
  
  try {
    const data = ws.getWorldstate();
    expect(data).to.be.undefined;
  } finally {
    ws.forceError = false;
  }
});
utilities/WSCache.js (1)

63-66: Enhance error handling to aid debugging.

While logging errors is good, the current implementation silently fails which could make test debugging harder. Consider:

  1. Re-throwing the error after logging
  2. Adding more context about the failed data
  3. Using structured logging with error details
  } catch (e) {
-   this.#logger.error(`failed to parse worldstate data: ${e}`);
+   this.#logger.error('Failed to parse worldstate data', {
+     error: e.message,
+     language: this.#language,
+     platform: this.#platform,
+   });
    this.#logger.debug(e.stack);
+   throw e; // Re-throw to aid in test debugging
  }
index.js (1)

73-79: LGTM with suggestions for improvement.

The new debug getter provides useful introspection capabilities, which aligns well with the PR's objective of fixing test issues.

Consider these improvements:

  1. Add error handling to prevent crashes:
 get debug() {
+  try {
     return {
       rss: this.getRss(),
       worldstate: this.#worldstate?.get(),
       twitter: this.#twitter?.clientInfoValid ? this.#twitter.getData() : undefined,
     };
+  } catch (error) {
+    logger.error('Error in debug getter:', error);
+    return {
+      error: 'Failed to retrieve debug data',
+      timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
+    };
+  }
 }
  1. Consider implementing lazy loading to improve performance:
 get debug() {
   return {
-    rss: this.getRss(),
-    worldstate: this.#worldstate?.get(),
-    twitter: this.#twitter?.clientInfoValid ? this.#twitter.getData() : undefined,
+    get rss() { return this.getRss(); },
+    get worldstate() { return this.#worldstate?.get(); },
+    get twitter() {
+      return this.#twitter?.clientInfoValid ? this.#twitter.getData() : undefined;
+    },
   };
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8410311 and caebead.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • handlers/RSS.js (1 hunks)
  • handlers/Twitter.js (1 hunks)
  • index.js (1 hunks)
  • package.json (5 hunks)
  • test/specs/access.spec.js (1 hunks)
  • test/specs/emitter.spec.js (1 hunks)
  • utilities/WSCache.js (4 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • handlers/RSS.js
  • handlers/Twitter.js
🔇 Additional comments (8)
test/specs/emitter.spec.js (1)

1-4: Verify the package import path works in local development.

The import path worldstate-emitter assumes the package is installed from npm. This might break local development and testing when working with uncommitted changes.

Let's verify the package configuration:

test/specs/access.spec.js (1)

1-2: Verify the package import path change.

The import path change from relative (../../index.js) to package name (worldstate-emitter) needs verification to ensure it works correctly in all environments.

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify package.json configuration supports the new import path

# Test 1: Check if package.json has the correct main/exports configuration
echo "Checking package.json configuration..."
cat package.json | jq '.exports, .main'

# Test 2: Check for consistent import patterns across test files
echo "Checking import patterns in other test files..."
rg "import.*WSEmitter" "test/"
utilities/WSCache.js (2)

23-31: LGTM! Well-structured logger integration.

The constructor changes are well-implemented with:

  • Proper JSDoc documentation
  • Optional logger parameter
  • Sensible fallback to baseLogger

3-3: Verify the logger import path to prevent circular dependencies.

The import path './index.js' might create a circular dependency since this file is in the utilities/ directory. Consider moving the logger to a separate utility file.

✅ Verification successful

Let me analyze the actual imports and exports to verify if there's a circular dependency.


The logger import is correctly implemented without circular dependencies

The logger is properly exported from utilities/index.js where it's created using Winston, and importing it in WSCache.js is a valid implementation pattern. The import path ./index.js is the correct way to access the shared logger instance, as the index file serves as the intended entry point for utility exports.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential circular dependencies
rg -l "from ['\"]\./utilities/WSCache" | grep "index.js"

Length of output: 58


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of index.js in utilities directory
fd "index.js" utilities/ --exec cat {}

# Check imports in index.js
rg "export.*logger" utilities/

Length of output: 2319

index.js (1)

73-79: Verify async/sync consistency in debug getter.

The debug getter synchronously calls getData() for Twitter, while there's an async getTwitter() method. This inconsistency could lead to unexpected behavior.

Consider either:

  1. Making the debug getter async to match getTwitter():
- get debug() {
+ async debug() {
   return {
     rss: this.getRss(),
     worldstate: this.#worldstate?.get(),
-    twitter: this.#twitter?.clientInfoValid ? this.#twitter.getData() : undefined,
+    twitter: await this.getTwitter(),
   };
 }
  1. Or adding a synchronous version of Twitter data retrieval if possible.
package.json (3)

22-24: LGTM! Good dual configuration for package entry point.

The addition of the exports field alongside the existing main field provides better module resolution control while maintaining backward compatibility.


35-35: LGTM! Enhanced dependency management.

The changes improve dependency handling:

  • Using npx ensures consistent peer dependency installation
  • The new validate script helps catch dependency issues early, especially useful given the test-related focus of this PR

Also applies to: 37-38


50-52: LGTM! Consistent rule formatting.

test/specs/access.spec.js Show resolved Hide resolved
utilities/WSCache.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
package.json Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

codeclimate bot commented Nov 5, 2024

Code Climate has analyzed commit 9320476 and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

View more on Code Climate.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant