Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Add option to use pre-supplied embeddings within SMACT for the dopant_prediction module #260

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Jun 4, 2024

Conversation

AntObi
Copy link
Collaborator

@AntObi AntObi commented Jun 3, 2024

Description

  • Added cosine similarity of SkipSpecies embeddings to data directory of SMACT
  • Updated Doper in doper.py to accept using pre-loaded similarities

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Test A
  • Test B

Test Configuration:

  • Python version: 3.10
  • Operating System: Windows 10

Reviewers

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules
  • I have checked my code and corrected any misspellings

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced Doper class to support an additional embedding parameter and a use_probability flag for more flexible dopant predictions.
  • Documentation

    • Added "tabulate" module to the list of imported modules in the documentation configuration.
  • Tests

    • Renamed test class to DopantPredictionTest and added new test methods for dopant prediction and number formatting.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 3, 2024

Warning

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The Doper class in the smact library has been enhanced to include an embedding parameter and a use_probability flag, enabling more flexible and accurate dopant predictions. The get_dopants and to_table methods have been updated to reflect these changes, and a new method _calculate_species_sim_prob has been added. Additionally, the documentation configuration has been updated, and new tests have been introduced to ensure the reliability of the new features.

Changes

Files Change Summary
smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py Enhanced Doper class with embedding and use_probability parameters; updated methods accordingly
docs/conf.py Added "tabulate" module to the list of imported modules
smact/tests/test_doper.py Renamed test class, added file path handling, and introduced new test methods

Sequence Diagram(s) (Beta)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Doper
    participant DataLoader
    participant SimilarityCalculator
    
    User->>Doper: Initialize with embedding and use_probability
    Doper->>DataLoader: Load embedding data
    Doper->>SimilarityCalculator: Calculate species similarity/probability
    User->>Doper: Call get_dopants
    Doper->>Doper: Check use_probability flag
    Doper->>SimilarityCalculator: Get similarity/probability scores
    Doper->>User: Return dopant predictions
Loading

Poem

In the land of code, where data's delight,
A rabbit hops with changes bright. 🐇
Embeddings and probabilities now in play,
Dopants predicted in a smarter way.
Tests and docs join the dance,
Ensuring all works at first glance.
Cheers to progress, in code we trust,
For in every byte, precision's a must!


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@AntObi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

AntObi commented Jun 3, 2024

@coderabbitai review

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 3, 2024

Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 3, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 88.67925% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 74.45%. Comparing base (579e67c) to head (e58ef9b).
Report is 132 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py 78.57% 6 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #260      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    73.82%   74.45%   +0.63%     
===========================================
  Files           24       24              
  Lines         2048     2083      +35     
===========================================
+ Hits          1512     1551      +39     
+ Misses         536      532       -4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 6

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 579e67c and 61088bb.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py (5 hunks)
Additional context used
Ruff
smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py

3-3: typing.Callable imported but unused


3-3: typing.Union imported but unused


10-10: smact.Element imported but unused


10-10: smact.element_dictionary imported but unused


101-101: Import groupby from line 2 shadowed by loop variable

GitHub Check: codecov/patch
smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py

[warning] 48-48: smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py#L48
Added line #L48 was not covered by tests


[warning] 52-52: smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py#L52
Added line #L52 was not covered by tests


[warning] 54-54: smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py#L54
Added line #L54 was not covered by tests


[warning] 58-58: smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py#L58
Added line #L58 was not covered by tests


[warning] 88-89: smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py#L88-L89
Added lines #L88 - L89 were not covered by tests


[warning] 91-91: smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py#L91
Added line #L91 was not covered by tests


[warning] 202-202: smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py#L202
Added line #L202 was not covered by tests


[warning] 216-216: smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py#L216
Added line #L216 was not covered by tests


[warning] 233-233: smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py#L233
Added line #L233 was not covered by tests


[warning] 247-247: smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py#L247
Added line #L247 was not covered by tests


[warning] 344-345: smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py#L344-L345
Added lines #L344 - L345 were not covered by tests


[warning] 347-347: smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py#L347
Added line #L347 was not covered by tests

Additional comments not posted (2)
smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py (2)

47-50: Ensure proper error handling for mutually exclusive parameters.

Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 48-48: smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py#L48
Added line #L48 was not covered by tests


344-347: Ensure that the headers in to_table method are correctly set based on the use_probability flag.

Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 344-345: smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py#L344-L345
Added lines #L344 - L345 were not covered by tests


[warning] 347-347: smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py#L347
Added line #L347 was not covered by tests


import numpy as np
from pymatgen.util import plotting
from tabulate import tabulate

import smact
from smact import Element, element_dictionary
from smact import Element, data_directory, element_dictionary
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove unused imports to maintain clarity and reduce overhead.

- from smact import Element, element_dictionary
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
from smact import Element, data_directory, element_dictionary
from smact import data_directory
Tools
Ruff

10-10: smact.Element imported but unused


10-10: smact.element_dictionary imported but unused

from itertools import groupby
from typing import Callable, List, Tuple, Type, Union
from typing import Callable, List, Optional, Tuple, Type, Union
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove unused imports to clean up the code.

- from typing import Callable, Union

Committable suggestion was skipped due low confidence.

Tools
Ruff

3-3: typing.Callable imported but unused


3-3: typing.Union imported but unused

Comment on lines 88 to 91
if self.use_probability:
sum_prob += CM.sub_prob(cation, selected_site)
else:
sum_prob += CM.get_lambda(cation, selected_site)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Refactor the repeated logic for probability and lambda calculations into a helper function to improve code maintainability.

+ def calculate_value(self, CM, specie, selected_site):
+     if self.use_probability:
+         return CM.sub_prob(specie, selected_site)
+     else:
+         return CM.get_lambda(specie, selected_site)

-                    if self.use_probability:
-                        sum_prob += CM.sub_prob(cation, selected_site)
-                    else:
-                        sum_prob += CM.get_lambda(cation, selected_site)
+                    sum_prob += self.calculate_value(CM, cation, selected_site)

Also applies to: 197-204, 211-218, 228-235, 242-249

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
if self.use_probability:
sum_prob += CM.sub_prob(cation, selected_site)
else:
sum_prob += CM.get_lambda(cation, selected_site)
def calculate_value(self, CM, specie, selected_site):
if self.use_probability:
return CM.sub_prob(specie, selected_site)
else:
return CM.get_lambda(specie, selected_site)
sum_prob += self.calculate_value(CM, cation, selected_site)
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 88-89: smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py#L88-L89
Added lines #L88 - L89 were not covered by tests


[warning] 91-91: smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py#L91
Added line #L91 was not covered by tests

Comment on lines +14 to +17
SKIPSSPECIES_COSINE_SIM_PATH = os.path.join(
data_directory,
"species_rep/skipspecies_20221028_319ion_dim200_cosine_similarity.json",
)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

The specified JSON file exists but is located at a different path than expected. Update the path in your code to reflect the correct location.

  • Correct path: smact/data/species_rep/skipspecies_20221028_319ion_dim200_cosine_similarity.json
Analysis chain

Ensure the path to the cosine similarity JSON is correct and accessible.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of the cosine similarity JSON file.

# Test: Check if the file exists. Expect: File exists.
if [ -f "src/smact/data_directory/species_rep/skipspecies_20221028_319ion_dim200_cosine_similarity.json" ]; then
  echo "File exists."
else
  echo "File does not exist."
fi

Length of output: 158



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for the cosine similarity JSON file within the repository.

# Test: Use fd to locate the file. Expect: File path is found.
fd skipspecies_20221028_319ion_dim200_cosine_similarity.json

Length of output: 143

"Only one of filepath or embedding should be provided"
)
if embedding and embedding != "skipspecies":
raise ValueError(f"Embedding {embedding} is not supported")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

The search results indicate that there are no specific tests for embedding validation logic in the current test suite. The existing tests do not cover the scenario where an unsupported embedding raises a ValueError.

  • smact/tests/test_doper.py: Contains a test for dopant_prediction, but it does not seem to cover embedding validation.
  • Other test files and functions do not appear to be related to embedding validation.

To ensure comprehensive test coverage, please add a test case that specifically validates the embedding logic and raises a ValueError for unsupported embeddings.

Analysis chain

Add test coverage for the embedding validation logic.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the test coverage for embedding validation logic.

# Test: Search for tests related to embedding validation. Expect: Tests exist.
rg --type python $'def test_embedding_validation'

Length of output: 81



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the test coverage for embedding validation logic.

# Correct the rg command to search for test functions in Python files.
rg 'def test_' --glob '*.py'

# Additionally, search for test files that might contain relevant tests.
fd --type f --name '*test*.py'

Length of output: 3340



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the test coverage for embedding validation logic.

# Correct the fd command to search for test files.
fd --type f test

# Manually inspect the test functions found by rg to see if any might cover embedding validation.
rg 'def test_' --glob '*.py'

Length of output: 3390

Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 52-52: smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py#L52
Added line #L52 was not covered by tests

Comment on lines 54 to 56
self.cation_mutator = CationMutator.from_json(
SKIPSSPECIES_COSINE_SIM_PATH
)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

The from_json method in the CationMutator class was not found, and no error handling was detected in the from_json method located in smact/structure_prediction/mutation.py. This indicates that the CationMutator.from_json method might not handle JSON path errors properly.

  • Ensure that the CationMutator.from_json method exists and is correctly implemented.
  • Verify that the method includes proper error handling for the provided JSON path.
Analysis chain

Ensure that the CationMutator.from_json method correctly handles the provided JSON path.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correct handling of JSON path in `CationMutator.from_json`.

# Test: Search for error handling in `CationMutator.from_json`. Expect: Proper error handling.
rg --type python $'CationMutator.from_json' | rg 'try'

Length of output: 82



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correct handling of JSON path in `CationMutator.from_json`.

# Test: Search for the `from_json` method in the `CationMutator` class and check for error handling.
ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'class CationMutator {
  $$$
  def from_json($_, $_) {
    $$$
  }
  $$$  
}' | rg 'try'

Length of output: 466



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correct handling of JSON path in `CationMutator.from_json`.

# Test: Search for the `from_json` method in the `CationMutator` class and check for error handling.
ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'class CationMutator:
  def from_json($_, $_):
    $$$' | rg 'try'

Length of output: 99



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Locate the `from_json` method in the `CationMutator` class and inspect its implementation.

# Step 1: Locate the `from_json` method in the `CationMutator` class.
ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'class CationMutator:
  def from_json($_, $_):
    $$$'

# Step 2: Inspect the implementation of the `from_json` method for error handling.
ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'def from_json($_, $_):
  $$$' | rg 'try'

Length of output: 279



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Locate the `from_json` method across the entire codebase and inspect its implementation.

# Step 1: Locate the `from_json` method across the entire codebase.
rg --type py 'def from_json'

# Step 2: Inspect the implementation of the `from_json` method for error handling.
rg --type py 'def from_json' -A 20 | rg 'try'

Length of output: 244

Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 54-54: smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py#L54
Added line #L54 was not covered by tests

@AntObi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

AntObi commented Jun 3, 2024

@coderabbitai review

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 3, 2024

Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py (1)

Line range hint 100-100: Avoid shadowing the import groupby with a loop variable.

- for groupby in zip(keys, dopants_list, groupby_list):
+ for group in zip(keys, dopants_list, groupby_list):
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 58-58: smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py#L58
Added line #L58 was not covered by tests

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 61088bb and 1f575ac.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • docs/conf.py (1 hunks)
  • smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py (7 hunks)
  • smact/tests/test_doper.py (2 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to errors (1)
  • smact/tests/test_doper.py (no review received)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • docs/conf.py
Additional context used
Ruff
smact/tests/test_doper.py

4-4: smact imported but unused


6-6: smact.structure_prediction.mutation imported but unused


14-14: Local variable num_dopants is assigned to but never used


59-59: Local variable test is assigned to but never used

smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py

100-100: Import groupby from line 2 shadowed by loop variable

GitHub Check: codecov/patch
smact/tests/test_doper.py

[warning] 74-74: smact/tests/test_doper.py#L74
Added line #L74 was not covered by tests

smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py

[warning] 58-58: smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py#L58
Added line #L58 was not covered by tests


[warning] 88-88: smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py#L88
Added line #L88 was not covered by tests


[warning] 159-159: smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py#L159
Added line #L159 was not covered by tests


[warning] 352-353: smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py#L352-L353
Added lines #L352 - L353 were not covered by tests


[warning] 355-355: smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py#L355
Added line #L355 was not covered by tests

Additional comments not posted (1)
smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py (1)

1-1: Remove unused import.

- import smact

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


import numpy as np
from pymatgen.util import plotting
from tabulate import tabulate

import smact
from smact import Element, element_dictionary
from smact import data_directory
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove unused imports.

- from smact import data_directory
- from smact.structure_prediction import mutation, utilities

Committable suggestion was skipped due low confidence.

SKIPSSPECIES_COSINE_SIM_PATH
)
elif filepath:
self.cation_mutator = mutation.CationMutator.from_json(filepath)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

The specific lines in doper.py are not covered by tests.

  • self.cation_mutator = mutation.CationMutator.from_json(filepath)
  • sum_prob += self._calculate_species_sim_prob(cation, selected_site)
  • return self.cation_mutator.get_lambda(species1, species2)
  • headers = ["Rank", "Dopant", "Host", "Probability", "Selectivity"]
  • headers = ["Rank", "Dopant", "Host", "Similarity", "Selectivity"]

These lines were not found in the test files smact/tests/test_core.py, smact/tests/test_doper.py, and smact/tests/test_structure.py.

Analysis chain

Ensure these lines are covered by tests.

Also applies to: 88-88, 159-159, 352-353, 355-355

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify test coverage for specific lines in doper.py.

# Test: Check if lines 58, 88, 159, 352-353, 355 are covered by tests. Expect: Lines are covered.
rg --type python $'self.cation_mutator = mutation.CationMutator.from_json(filepath)' --files-with-matches
rg --type python $'sum_prob += self._calculate_species_sim_prob(cation, selected_site)' --files-with-matches
rg --type python $'return self.cation_mutator.get_lambda(species1, species2)' --files-with-matches
rg --type python $'headers = ["Rank", "Dopant", "Host", "Probability", "Selectivity"]' --files-with-matches
rg --type python $'headers = ["Rank", "Dopant", "Host", "Similarity", "Selectivity"]' --files-with-matches

Length of output: 688



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify test coverage for specific lines in doper.py.

# Test: Check if lines 58, 88, 159, 352-353, 355 are covered by tests. Expect: Lines are covered.
rg --glob '*.py' 'self.cation_mutator = mutation.CationMutator.from_json(filepath)'
rg --glob '*.py' 'sum_prob += self._calculate_species_sim_prob(cation, selected_site)'
rg --glob '*.py' 'return self.cation_mutator.get_lambda(species1, species2)'
rg --glob '*.py' 'headers = ["Rank", "Dopant", "Host", "Probability", "Selectivity"]'
rg --glob '*.py' 'headers = ["Rank", "Dopant", "Host", "Similarity", "Selectivity"]'

Length of output: 428



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify test coverage for specific lines in doper.py.

# Find all test files
test_files=$(fd --glob '*test*.py')

# Check if the specific lines are covered in the test files
for test_file in $test_files; do
    echo "Checking $test_file"
    rg 'self.cation_mutator = mutation.CationMutator.from_json(filepath)' $test_file
    rg 'sum_prob += self._calculate_species_sim_prob(cation, selected_site)' $test_file
    rg 'return self.cation_mutator.get_lambda(species1, species2)' $test_file
    rg 'headers = ["Rank", "Dopant", "Host", "Probability", "Selectivity"]' $test_file
    rg 'headers = ["Rank", "Dopant", "Host", "Similarity", "Selectivity"]' $test_file
done

Length of output: 1938

Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 58-58: smact/dopant_prediction/doper.py#L58
Added line #L58 was not covered by tests

@AntObi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

AntObi commented Jun 4, 2024

@coderabbitai review

@AntObi AntObi merged commit 846e09a into WMD-group:develop Jun 4, 2024
14 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 4, 2024

Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant