Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use utilix to validate X509 proxy #213

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 19, 2024
Merged

Use utilix to validate X509 proxy #213

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 19, 2024

Conversation

dachengx
Copy link
Collaborator

@dachengx dachengx commented Sep 19, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Depends on XENONnT/utilix#124.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Sep 19, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 10933497755

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.05%) to 89.672%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 10923998170: 0.05%
Covered Lines: 1667
Relevant Lines: 1859
💛 - Coveralls

@dachengx dachengx marked this pull request as ready for review September 19, 2024 02:48
@dachengx dachengx merged commit aa380c9 into main Sep 19, 2024
7 checks passed
@dachengx dachengx deleted the use_utilix_validate_x509_proxy branch September 19, 2024 02:48
@dachengx
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Actually, this PR depends on a new release of https://github.com/XENONnT/utilix, but we never tested the SubmitterHTCondor in the alea repo so there is no failure in the auto-test.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@dachengx @coveralls