Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Scheduler updated on api and impl #42

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 4, 2024
Merged

Conversation

stbischof
Copy link
Contributor

  • extract Constants
  • constant for default name
  • constants for names expressions
  • servicePropery cron -> cron.expression and String[]
  • fallback for old servicePropery cron
  • hold tests of old servicePropery cron
  • add test of old servicePropery cron.expression
  • servicePropery name -> cron.name and define in api
  • fallback for old servicePropery name
  • use osgi converter in scheduler
  • add Requirement and Capability annotation
  • make corePoolSize configurable
  • make shutdownTimeout(soft/hard) configurable
  • fix fieldNames and javadoc
  • add duration methods to Scheduler
  • make parameterNames more expressiv

@stbischof stbischof force-pushed the schedd branch 2 times, most recently from 547a784 to d00e8e1 Compare September 3, 2024 16:59
- extract Constants
- constant for default name
- constants for names expressions
- servicePropery cron -> cronjob.cron and String[]
- fallback for old servicePropery cron
- hold tests of old servicePropery cron
- add test of old servicePropery cronjob.cron
- servicePropery name -> cronjob.name and define in api
- fallback for old servicePropery name
- use osgi converter in scheduler
- add Requirement and Capability annotation
- make corePoolSize configurable
- make shutdownTimeout(soft/hard) configurable
- fix fieldNames and javadoc
- add duration methods to Scheduler
- make parameterNames more expressiv

Signed-off-by: Stefan Bischof <[email protected]>
@pkriens pkriens merged commit 73d17d1 into aQute-os:master Sep 4, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants