-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Review and brainstorm about Filter, Sort and Searchoptions #88
Comments
Overview of the top part of the user interfaceCan be found here: https://dhcr.clarin-dariah.eu/ |
Sort functionalityThere can be sorted on:
By default the list is also sorted: The latest updated course on top. So that will contain a mix of new added and updated courses, with the most recent on top. This is only briefly explained after clicking the sort button. Disadvantages/remarks to sort functionality - Patrick's opinion
Advantages - Patrick's opinion
|
Filter functionalityThere can be filtered on:
Disadvantages/remarks to filter functionality - Patrick's opinion
|
Search bar functionalitySearch on (a part of):
Disadvantages/remarks to search bar functionality - Patrick's opinion
Advantages/remarks to search bar functionality - Patrick's opinion
|
Showing results when using sort or filter - behavior
Showing results when using the current searchbar - behavior
|
Recent idea's for improvements
|
@IvdL22 @PixlTracer I'm looking forward to your response ;) |
Consider introducing tags for filtering (as suggested in #70)
|
As discussed in the meeting today, this issue is put on hold until input on the UI is received. |
Goal of this issue
Explain about which part of the user interface we're talking, maybe also to people who don't know the application very well. As well it could be a place to: collect feedback, remarks about things that don't work as expected or preferred, suggest improvements or brainstorm about new idea's for this specific part of the user interface.
There might be some redundancy with other issues (slightly) related to this, but we could give it a try?
I'll start by describing the parts and giving my opinion about it in multiple comments below.
(For now I've added this issue to the November milestone. That it targeted at the review, not at the implementation.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: