Skip to content

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been...

Moderate severity Unreviewed Published Oct 21, 2024 to the GitHub Advisory Database • Updated Oct 24, 2024

Package

No package listedSuggest a package

Affected versions

Unknown

Patched versions

Unknown

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm/filemap: fix filemap_get_folios_contig THP panic

Patch series "memfd-pin huge page fixes".

Fix multiple bugs that occur when using memfd_pin_folios with hugetlb
pages and THP. The hugetlb bugs only bite when the page is not yet
faulted in when memfd_pin_folios is called. The THP bug bites when the
starting offset passed to memfd_pin_folios is not huge page aligned. See
the commit messages for details.

This patch (of 5):

memfd_pin_folios on memory backed by THP panics if the requested start
offset is not huge page aligned:

BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000036
RIP: 0010:filemap_get_folios_contig+0xdf/0x290
RSP: 0018:ffffc9002092fbe8 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 0000000000000002

The fault occurs here, because xas_load returns a folio with value 2:

filemap_get_folios_contig()
    for (folio = xas_load(&xas); folio && xas.xa_index <= end;
                    folio = xas_next(&xas)) {
            ...
            if (!folio_try_get(folio))   <-- BOOM

"2" is an xarray sibling entry. We get it because memfd_pin_folios does
not round the indices passed to filemap_get_folios_contig to huge page
boundaries for THP, so we load from the middle of a huge page range see a
sibling. (It does round for hugetlbfs, at the is_file_hugepages test).

To fix, if the folio is a sibling, then return the next index as the
starting point for the next call to filemap_get_folios_contig.

References

Published by the National Vulnerability Database Oct 21, 2024
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Oct 21, 2024
Last updated Oct 24, 2024

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

EPSS score

0.043%
(11th percentile)

Weaknesses

CVE ID

CVE-2024-49873

GHSA ID

GHSA-j2cc-c4fg-77cq

Source code

No known source code

Dependabot alerts are not supported on this advisory because it does not have a package from a supported ecosystem with an affected and fixed version.

Learn more about GitHub language support

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.