Skip to content

Missing validation in shape inference for `Dequantize`

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Aug 11, 2021 in tensorflow/tensorflow • Updated Jun 27, 2023

Package

pip tensorflow (pip)

Affected versions

< 2.3.4
>= 2.4.0, < 2.4.3
= 2.5.0

Patched versions

2.3.4
2.4.3
2.5.1
pip tensorflow-cpu (pip)
< 2.3.4
>= 2.4.0, < 2.4.3
= 2.5.0
2.3.4
2.4.3
2.5.1
pip tensorflow-gpu (pip)
< 2.3.4
>= 2.4.0, < 2.4.3
= 2.5.0
2.3.4
2.4.3
2.5.1

Description

Impact

The shape inference code for tf.raw_ops.Dequantize has a vulnerability that could trigger a denial of service via a segfault if an attacker provides invalid arguments:

import tensorflow as tf

tf.compat.v1.disable_v2_behavior()
tf.raw_ops.Dequantize(
  input_tensor = tf.constant(-10.0, dtype=tf.float32),
  input_tensor = tf.cast(input_tensor, dtype=tf.quint8),
  min_range = tf.constant([], shape=[0], dtype=tf.float32),
  max_range = tf.constant([], shape=[0], dtype=tf.float32),
  mode  = 'MIN_COMBINED',
  narrow_range=False,
  axis=-10,
  dtype=tf.dtypes.float32)

The shape inference implementation uses axis to select between two different values for minmax_rank which is then used to retrieve tensor dimensions. However, code assumes that axis can be either -1 or a value greater than -1, with no validation for the other values.

Patches

We have patched the issue in GitHub commit da857cfa0fde8f79ad0afdbc94e88b5d4bbec764.

The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.6.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.5.1, TensorFlow 2.4.3, and TensorFlow 2.3.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.

For more information

Please consult our security guide for more information regarding the security model and how to contact us with issues and questions.

Attribution

This vulnerability has been reported by Yakun Zhang of Baidu Security.

References

@mihaimaruseac mihaimaruseac published to tensorflow/tensorflow Aug 11, 2021
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Aug 12, 2021
Reviewed Aug 24, 2021
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Aug 25, 2021
Last updated Jun 27, 2023

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

EPSS score

0.044%
(13th percentile)

CVE ID

CVE-2021-37677

GHSA ID

GHSA-qfpc-5pjr-mh26

Source code

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.