Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[fix #213] Properly deal with unboxed records, again #214

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 7, 2023

Conversation

flupe
Copy link
Contributor

@flupe flupe commented Nov 7, 2023

Ok I should have tested my last PR more carefully indeed, sorry. Using an unboxed record in a type now also only keeps the type of the only non-erased field.

Copy link
Contributor

@omelkonian omelkonian left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@omelkonian omelkonian merged commit 15314cd into agda:master Nov 7, 2023
6 checks passed
flupe added a commit to flupe/agda2hs that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2023
@jespercockx jespercockx added this to the 1.2 milestone Nov 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants