-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 207
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add new script reverse_markers.py #100
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Hello! In which cases it is convenient to reverse markers selection? I would like to understand how often this can happen to other users. P.S. Sorry for the long reply. |
My use for this script was so that I could select markers for GCP's, then mark remaining markers for use as check points. Hope that makes sense? |
Hmm, but can't the same thing be achieved in a simpler way? F.e.:
How does enabling/disabling markers affect the placement of marker projections in photos? Aren't they independent? |
After importing reference file, I will de select markers to use as checkpoint, mark photos for GCP's, update transformations. For checkpoints, I do not update transformation, to ensure they are truly independant and giving me a more realistic accuracy value. So to recap with a bit more detail:
If I didnt have my script, on sites where I have 10 - 20 GCP's, I would have to manually select / deselect markers when switching from marking GCP's / Checkpoints. With the script its a single click of the menu, regardless of how many markers I have. This the the workflow I am following from this video, which prompted me to create the script, to save time selecting deselecting markers. |
But if I correctly understand - your workflow will also work in the following way without the script:
Am I missing something? P.S. this is not so important, but I also don't fully understand this - |
This script will reverse the current marker selection.