Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Port to Sphinx 8.0 #832

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 19, 2024
Merged

Port to Sphinx 8.0 #832

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 19, 2024

Conversation

cjwatson
Copy link
Contributor

What do these changes do?

The old intersphinx_mapping format has been removed; it must now map identifiers to (target, inventory) tuples.

Are there changes in behavior for the user?

No.

Checklist

  • I think the code is well written
  • [N/A] Unit tests for the changes exist
  • Documentation reflects the changes

The old `intersphinx_mapping` format has been removed; it must now map
identifiers to (target, inventory) tuples.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 19, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.13%. Comparing base (3ad4302) to head (3a14699).
Report is 125 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #832   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.13%   94.13%           
=======================================
  Files          11       11           
  Lines         597      597           
  Branches       30       30           
=======================================
  Hits          562      562           
  Misses         26       26           
  Partials        9        9           
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 94.13% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Dreamsorcerer Dreamsorcerer merged commit 0cfd988 into aio-libs:master Dec 19, 2024
14 of 15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants